利用锥束计算机断层扫描和实时三维经会阴超声监测超低分割立体定向放射治疗中危局限性前列腺癌的早期毒性。

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Journal Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-28 DOI:10.3857/roj.2020.00969
Eric Ka-Chai Lee, Ronnie Wing-Kin Leung, Hollis Siu-Leung Luk, Barry Bar-Wai Wo
{"title":"利用锥束计算机断层扫描和实时三维经会阴超声监测超低分割立体定向放射治疗中危局限性前列腺癌的早期毒性。","authors":"Eric Ka-Chai Lee,&nbsp;Ronnie Wing-Kin Leung,&nbsp;Hollis Siu-Leung Luk,&nbsp;Barry Bar-Wai Wo","doi":"10.3857/roj.2020.00969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is central to the safe and effective delivery of ultrahypofractionated (UF) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer. However, the optimal IGRT modality remains uncertain. We aim to study the safety of performing UF-SBRT using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and real-time transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) monitoring.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively review the medical records of 26 patients who had received UF-SBRT for intermediate risk localized prostate cancer in our institution from October 2018 to December 2020. All patients were treated with SBRT without fiducial marker and received 35-40 Gy to the clinical target volume in 5 fractions over 2-5 weeks. CBCT was used to correct for interfraction displacement while intrafraction displacement of the prostate gland was monitored using Elekta Clarity Autoscan TPUS with 4 mm isotropic warning level. All patients also received neoadjuvant and concurrent androgen deprivation therapy for a total of 6 months. The primary endpoints were incidence of acute toxicities and patient reported urinary toxicities in terms of the International Prostate Symptom Score: before (IPSS1), at the completion of (IPSS2), and at 3-6 months (IPSS3) after SBRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All men were treated and followed up for at least 3 months after SBRT. Patients experienced transient worsening of their urinary symptoms at the end of SBRT but they usually recovered in 3-6 months afterwards. The median IPSS1, IPSS2, and IPSS3 were 12, 12.5, and 8, respectively. One patient developed grade 3 rectal bleeding which was related to underlying hemorrhoid. No other grade 3-4 acute toxicity was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It appears safe to deliver UF-SBRT without fiducial marker for prostate cancer patients using CBCT and non-invasive hybrid imaging modalities for positioning and tracking. Longer follow-up is necessary to monitor the treatment efficacy and long-term toxicities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46572,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f0/e5/roj-2020-00969.PMC8497869.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early toxicities of ultrahypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for intermediate risk localized prostate cancer using cone-beam computed tomography and real-time three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound monitoring.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Ka-Chai Lee,&nbsp;Ronnie Wing-Kin Leung,&nbsp;Hollis Siu-Leung Luk,&nbsp;Barry Bar-Wai Wo\",\"doi\":\"10.3857/roj.2020.00969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is central to the safe and effective delivery of ultrahypofractionated (UF) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer. However, the optimal IGRT modality remains uncertain. We aim to study the safety of performing UF-SBRT using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and real-time transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) monitoring.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively review the medical records of 26 patients who had received UF-SBRT for intermediate risk localized prostate cancer in our institution from October 2018 to December 2020. All patients were treated with SBRT without fiducial marker and received 35-40 Gy to the clinical target volume in 5 fractions over 2-5 weeks. CBCT was used to correct for interfraction displacement while intrafraction displacement of the prostate gland was monitored using Elekta Clarity Autoscan TPUS with 4 mm isotropic warning level. All patients also received neoadjuvant and concurrent androgen deprivation therapy for a total of 6 months. The primary endpoints were incidence of acute toxicities and patient reported urinary toxicities in terms of the International Prostate Symptom Score: before (IPSS1), at the completion of (IPSS2), and at 3-6 months (IPSS3) after SBRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All men were treated and followed up for at least 3 months after SBRT. Patients experienced transient worsening of their urinary symptoms at the end of SBRT but they usually recovered in 3-6 months afterwards. The median IPSS1, IPSS2, and IPSS3 were 12, 12.5, and 8, respectively. One patient developed grade 3 rectal bleeding which was related to underlying hemorrhoid. No other grade 3-4 acute toxicity was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It appears safe to deliver UF-SBRT without fiducial marker for prostate cancer patients using CBCT and non-invasive hybrid imaging modalities for positioning and tracking. Longer follow-up is necessary to monitor the treatment efficacy and long-term toxicities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Oncology Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f0/e5/roj-2020-00969.PMC8497869.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Oncology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2020.00969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2020.00969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)是安全有效地为局部前列腺癌提供超低分割(UF)立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)的核心。然而,最佳IGRT方式仍不确定。我们的目的是研究使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和实时经会阴超声(tpu)监测进行UF-SBRT的安全性。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了2018年10月至2020年12月在我院接受UF-SBRT治疗中危局限性前列腺癌的26例患者的病历。所有患者均接受无基准标志物的SBRT治疗,并在2-5周内分5次接受35-40 Gy至临床靶体积的治疗。CBCT用于校正干涉位移,同时使用Elekta Clarity Autoscan tpu监测前列腺的干涉位移,该tpu具有4 mm各向同性警告水平。所有患者同时接受新辅助治疗和雄激素剥夺治疗,共6个月。主要终点是急性毒性的发生率和患者根据国际前列腺症状评分报告的尿毒性:在(IPSS1)之前,(IPSS2)完成时,以及SBRT后3-6个月(IPSS3)。结果:所有患者均接受SBRT治疗并随访至少3个月。患者在SBRT结束时尿路症状短暂恶化,但通常在3-6个月后恢复。IPSS1、IPSS2和IPSS3的中位值分别为12、12.5和8。1例患者发生3级直肠出血,这与潜在的痔疮有关。未见其他3-4级急性毒性反应。结论:使用CBCT和非侵入性混合成像方式进行定位和跟踪,为前列腺癌患者提供无基准标志物的UF-SBRT是安全的。需要更长的随访时间来监测治疗效果和长期毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early toxicities of ultrahypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for intermediate risk localized prostate cancer using cone-beam computed tomography and real-time three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound monitoring.

Purpose: Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is central to the safe and effective delivery of ultrahypofractionated (UF) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer. However, the optimal IGRT modality remains uncertain. We aim to study the safety of performing UF-SBRT using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and real-time transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) monitoring.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively review the medical records of 26 patients who had received UF-SBRT for intermediate risk localized prostate cancer in our institution from October 2018 to December 2020. All patients were treated with SBRT without fiducial marker and received 35-40 Gy to the clinical target volume in 5 fractions over 2-5 weeks. CBCT was used to correct for interfraction displacement while intrafraction displacement of the prostate gland was monitored using Elekta Clarity Autoscan TPUS with 4 mm isotropic warning level. All patients also received neoadjuvant and concurrent androgen deprivation therapy for a total of 6 months. The primary endpoints were incidence of acute toxicities and patient reported urinary toxicities in terms of the International Prostate Symptom Score: before (IPSS1), at the completion of (IPSS2), and at 3-6 months (IPSS3) after SBRT.

Results: All men were treated and followed up for at least 3 months after SBRT. Patients experienced transient worsening of their urinary symptoms at the end of SBRT but they usually recovered in 3-6 months afterwards. The median IPSS1, IPSS2, and IPSS3 were 12, 12.5, and 8, respectively. One patient developed grade 3 rectal bleeding which was related to underlying hemorrhoid. No other grade 3-4 acute toxicity was observed.

Conclusion: It appears safe to deliver UF-SBRT without fiducial marker for prostate cancer patients using CBCT and non-invasive hybrid imaging modalities for positioning and tracking. Longer follow-up is necessary to monitor the treatment efficacy and long-term toxicities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Implementing high-dose rate surface mould brachytherapy for carcinoma of eyelid: a practical approach and weekly review The effects of high-dose radiation therapy on bone: a scoping review Validation of Combs prognostic scoring system in Indian recurrent glioma patients treated with re-radiation Long-term toxicities after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with or without total body irradiation: a population-based study in Korea Proton beam therapy as a promising option for high-risk limited stage small cell lung cancer: revealing potential of future novel agents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1