Alexandre Nunes, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Margarida Espanha, Júlia Teles, João Moita, Kristian Kjær Petersen
{"title":"评估办公室工作人员慢性颈部疼痛致敏性的床边临床试验。","authors":"Alexandre Nunes, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Margarida Espanha, Júlia Teles, João Moita, Kristian Kjær Petersen","doi":"10.1080/08990220.2021.1986379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess pain sensitization in individual office workers with chronic neck pain through simple bedside quantitative sensory tests (QST) and to associate the findings with pain intensity and pain catastrophizing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred-and-four office workers with chronic neck pain were assessed using pressure pain threshold (PPT) considering pain sensitive if PPTs were lower than 155 kPa in the upper trapezius and 245 kPa in the tibialis anterior. Pain sensitive to temporal summation of pain (TSP) was considered if there was a difference of two points in the visual analogue scale (VAS) comparing the first and last stimulus. Pain sensitive was considered to conditioned pain modulation (CPM) if the CPM-effect was less than -7.5%. Pain intensity and catastrophizing were measured using VAS and with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was at least one pain sensitive QST finding in 66 office workers (63.5%). TSP findings were the most common (48.1%), followed by PPT's (31.7%) and CPM (20.2%). Based on the QST findings, office workers were divided based on the number of individual QST findings, and higher pain intensity and pain catastrophizing scores were found in office workers with one (<i>N</i> = 38, <i>P</i> < 0.05) or two (<i>N</i> = 28, <i>P</i> < 0.05) compared with office workers with no QST findings (<i>N</i> = 38).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that most office workers with chronic neck pain exhibit either widespread pressure hyperalgesia, facilitated TSP or impaired CPM, indicating pain sensitization within the central nervous system. This was associated with increased clinical pain and pain catastrophizing rumination scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":49498,"journal":{"name":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","volume":"38 4","pages":"357-365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bedside clinical tests to assess sensitization in office workers with chronic neck pain.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Nunes, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Margarida Espanha, Júlia Teles, João Moita, Kristian Kjær Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08990220.2021.1986379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess pain sensitization in individual office workers with chronic neck pain through simple bedside quantitative sensory tests (QST) and to associate the findings with pain intensity and pain catastrophizing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred-and-four office workers with chronic neck pain were assessed using pressure pain threshold (PPT) considering pain sensitive if PPTs were lower than 155 kPa in the upper trapezius and 245 kPa in the tibialis anterior. Pain sensitive to temporal summation of pain (TSP) was considered if there was a difference of two points in the visual analogue scale (VAS) comparing the first and last stimulus. Pain sensitive was considered to conditioned pain modulation (CPM) if the CPM-effect was less than -7.5%. Pain intensity and catastrophizing were measured using VAS and with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was at least one pain sensitive QST finding in 66 office workers (63.5%). TSP findings were the most common (48.1%), followed by PPT's (31.7%) and CPM (20.2%). Based on the QST findings, office workers were divided based on the number of individual QST findings, and higher pain intensity and pain catastrophizing scores were found in office workers with one (<i>N</i> = 38, <i>P</i> < 0.05) or two (<i>N</i> = 28, <i>P</i> < 0.05) compared with office workers with no QST findings (<i>N</i> = 38).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that most office workers with chronic neck pain exhibit either widespread pressure hyperalgesia, facilitated TSP or impaired CPM, indicating pain sensitization within the central nervous system. This was associated with increased clinical pain and pain catastrophizing rumination scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Somatosensory and Motor Research\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"357-365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Somatosensory and Motor Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2021.1986379\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2021.1986379","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:本研究旨在通过简单床边定量感觉测试(QST)评估慢性颈部疼痛患者的疼痛致敏性,并将结果与疼痛强度和疼痛灾难化联系起来。方法:采用压痛阈值(PPT)对104例上班族慢性颈痛进行评估,当上斜方肌和胫骨前肌的压痛阈值分别低于155 kPa和245 kPa时,考虑疼痛敏感性。第一次和最后一次刺激的视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale, VAS)相差2分时,认为疼痛对疼痛的时间累积(temporal sum of Pain, TSP)敏感。如果CPM效应小于-7.5%,则认为疼痛敏感为条件疼痛调节(CPM)。采用VAS和疼痛加重量表测量疼痛强度和加重程度。结果:66名上班族(63.5%)存在至少一种疼痛敏感性QST。TSP最常见(48.1%),其次是PPT(31.7%)和CPM(20.2%)。基于QST结果,将上班族按个体QST结果的数量进行划分,结果发现,有1项QST结果(N = 38, P < 0.05)或2项QST结果(N = 28, P < 0.05)的上班族比没有QST结果(N = 38)的上班族疼痛强度和疼痛灾难化得分更高。结论:本研究表明,大多数患有慢性颈部疼痛的办公室工作人员表现出广泛的压力痛觉过敏,促进TSP或CPM受损,表明中枢神经系统的疼痛敏感化。这与临床疼痛和疼痛灾难反刍得分增加有关。
Bedside clinical tests to assess sensitization in office workers with chronic neck pain.
Objective: This study aimed to assess pain sensitization in individual office workers with chronic neck pain through simple bedside quantitative sensory tests (QST) and to associate the findings with pain intensity and pain catastrophizing.
Methods: One hundred-and-four office workers with chronic neck pain were assessed using pressure pain threshold (PPT) considering pain sensitive if PPTs were lower than 155 kPa in the upper trapezius and 245 kPa in the tibialis anterior. Pain sensitive to temporal summation of pain (TSP) was considered if there was a difference of two points in the visual analogue scale (VAS) comparing the first and last stimulus. Pain sensitive was considered to conditioned pain modulation (CPM) if the CPM-effect was less than -7.5%. Pain intensity and catastrophizing were measured using VAS and with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale.
Results: There was at least one pain sensitive QST finding in 66 office workers (63.5%). TSP findings were the most common (48.1%), followed by PPT's (31.7%) and CPM (20.2%). Based on the QST findings, office workers were divided based on the number of individual QST findings, and higher pain intensity and pain catastrophizing scores were found in office workers with one (N = 38, P < 0.05) or two (N = 28, P < 0.05) compared with office workers with no QST findings (N = 38).
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that most office workers with chronic neck pain exhibit either widespread pressure hyperalgesia, facilitated TSP or impaired CPM, indicating pain sensitization within the central nervous system. This was associated with increased clinical pain and pain catastrophizing rumination scores.
期刊介绍:
Somatosensory & Motor Research publishes original, high-quality papers that encompass the entire range of investigations related to the neural bases for somatic sensation, somatic motor function, somatic motor integration, and modeling thereof. Comprising anatomical, physiological, biochemical, pharmacological, behavioural, and psychophysical studies, Somatosensory & Motor Research covers all facets of the peripheral and central processes underlying cutaneous sensation, and includes studies relating to afferent and efferent mechanisms of deep structures (e.g., viscera, muscle). Studies of motor systems at all levels of the neuraxis are covered, but reports restricted to non-neural aspects of muscle generally would belong in other journals.