预防老年人跌倒的多因素干预的成本效益:一项系统综述。

Vahid Alipour, Saber Azami-Aghdash, Aziz Rezapour, Naser Derakhshani, Akbar Ghiasi, Neghar Yusefzadeh, Sanaz Taghizade, Sahar Amuzadeh
{"title":"预防老年人跌倒的多因素干预的成本效益:一项系统综述。","authors":"Vahid Alipour,&nbsp;Saber Azami-Aghdash,&nbsp;Aziz Rezapour,&nbsp;Naser Derakhshani,&nbsp;Akbar Ghiasi,&nbsp;Neghar Yusefzadeh,&nbsp;Sanaz Taghizade,&nbsp;Sahar Amuzadeh","doi":"10.30476/BEAT.2021.84375.1068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the cost-effectiveness of multifactorial interventions to prevent falls in elderly people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review, the databases including PubMed via MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar (from 1st January 2000 to 30<sup>th</sup> February) were used. All pre-reviewed articles related to cost-effectiveness analysis of multifactorial interventions to prevent falls in elderly were included in this paper and congresses abstracts were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data and content-analysis method to analyze qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 456 articles, 19 were finally included in the study. Eighteen articles were conducted in High-Income Countries (HICs) and 16 were at the community level. Medical visits consultation and education were the most common interventions. Most studies were cost-effectiveness and using the Randomized Control Trial (RCT) methods. A fall of prevention costs ranged from $ 272 to $ 987. Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) interventions also ranged from the US $ 120,667 to the US $ 4280.9.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results show that despite the high effectiveness of multifactorial interventions to prevent elderly falls, the cost of the interventions are high and they are not very cost-effective. It would be better to design and implement multifactorial interventions with low cost and high effectiveness that are appropriate for each country.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525694/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effectiveness of Multifactorial Interventions in Preventing Falls among Elderly Population: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Vahid Alipour,&nbsp;Saber Azami-Aghdash,&nbsp;Aziz Rezapour,&nbsp;Naser Derakhshani,&nbsp;Akbar Ghiasi,&nbsp;Neghar Yusefzadeh,&nbsp;Sanaz Taghizade,&nbsp;Sahar Amuzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.30476/BEAT.2021.84375.1068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the cost-effectiveness of multifactorial interventions to prevent falls in elderly people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review, the databases including PubMed via MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar (from 1st January 2000 to 30<sup>th</sup> February) were used. All pre-reviewed articles related to cost-effectiveness analysis of multifactorial interventions to prevent falls in elderly were included in this paper and congresses abstracts were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data and content-analysis method to analyze qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 456 articles, 19 were finally included in the study. Eighteen articles were conducted in High-Income Countries (HICs) and 16 were at the community level. Medical visits consultation and education were the most common interventions. Most studies were cost-effectiveness and using the Randomized Control Trial (RCT) methods. A fall of prevention costs ranged from $ 272 to $ 987. Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) interventions also ranged from the US $ 120,667 to the US $ 4280.9.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results show that despite the high effectiveness of multifactorial interventions to prevent elderly falls, the cost of the interventions are high and they are not very cost-effective. It would be better to design and implement multifactorial interventions with low cost and high effectiveness that are appropriate for each country.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of emergency and trauma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525694/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of emergency and trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2021.84375.1068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2021.84375.1068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:回顾多因素干预预防老年人跌倒的成本-效果。方法:本系统综述使用PubMed via MEDLINE、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane Library和Google Scholar数据库(2000年1月1日至2月30日)。所有与预防老年人跌倒的多因素干预的成本-效果分析相关的预评文章均纳入本文,排除大会摘要。定量资料采用描述性统计,定性资料采用内容分析法。结果:在456篇文章中,最终有19篇被纳入研究。18篇文章在高收入国家(HICs)进行,16篇在社区层面进行。就诊、咨询和教育是最常见的干预措施。大多数研究是成本-效果和使用随机对照试验(RCT)方法。预防费用的下降幅度从272美元到987美元不等。增量成本-效果比(ICER)干预措施也从120,667美元到4280.9美元不等。结论:多因素干预对预防老年人跌倒具有较高的效果,但干预成本较高,成本效益不高。最好是设计和实施适合每个国家的低成本和高效率的多因素干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-Effectiveness of Multifactorial Interventions in Preventing Falls among Elderly Population: A Systematic Review.

Objective: To review the cost-effectiveness of multifactorial interventions to prevent falls in elderly people.

Methods: In this systematic review, the databases including PubMed via MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar (from 1st January 2000 to 30th February) were used. All pre-reviewed articles related to cost-effectiveness analysis of multifactorial interventions to prevent falls in elderly were included in this paper and congresses abstracts were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data and content-analysis method to analyze qualitative data.

Results: Out of the 456 articles, 19 were finally included in the study. Eighteen articles were conducted in High-Income Countries (HICs) and 16 were at the community level. Medical visits consultation and education were the most common interventions. Most studies were cost-effectiveness and using the Randomized Control Trial (RCT) methods. A fall of prevention costs ranged from $ 272 to $ 987. Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) interventions also ranged from the US $ 120,667 to the US $ 4280.9.

Conclusion: The results show that despite the high effectiveness of multifactorial interventions to prevent elderly falls, the cost of the interventions are high and they are not very cost-effective. It would be better to design and implement multifactorial interventions with low cost and high effectiveness that are appropriate for each country.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.
期刊最新文献
An Epidemiological Investigation on Patients with Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage from 2010 to 2020. A Novel Skin Incision for Posterior Fossa Midline and Paramedian Lesions: A Technical Note and Case Series. Surgical Treatment versus Conservative Management of Splenic Rupture: Outcomes and Risk Factors. Effect of Intranasal Remifentanil versus Lidocaine on Facilitation of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion and Cardiovascular Response: A Double-blind Clinical Trial Study. Ten-year Causes of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in Patients Referred to Ghaem Hospital from 2009 to 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1