细胞减少手术(CRS)和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)的术后恢复增强(ERAS):一项横断面调查。

IF 1.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pleura and Peritoneum Pub Date : 2021-06-21 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1515/pp-2021-0117
Geetu Bhandoria, Sohan Lal Solanki, Mrugank Bhavsar, Kalpana Balakrishnan, Cherukuri Bapuji, Nitin Bhorkar, Prashant Bhandarkar, Sameer Bhosale, Jigeeshu V Divatia, Anik Ghosh, Vikas Mahajan, Abraham Peedicayil, Praveen Nath, Snita Sinukumar, Robin Thambudorai, Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri, Aditi Bhatt
{"title":"细胞减少手术(CRS)和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)的术后恢复增强(ERAS):一项横断面调查。","authors":"Geetu Bhandoria,&nbsp;Sohan Lal Solanki,&nbsp;Mrugank Bhavsar,&nbsp;Kalpana Balakrishnan,&nbsp;Cherukuri Bapuji,&nbsp;Nitin Bhorkar,&nbsp;Prashant Bhandarkar,&nbsp;Sameer Bhosale,&nbsp;Jigeeshu V Divatia,&nbsp;Anik Ghosh,&nbsp;Vikas Mahajan,&nbsp;Abraham Peedicayil,&nbsp;Praveen Nath,&nbsp;Snita Sinukumar,&nbsp;Robin Thambudorai,&nbsp;Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri,&nbsp;Aditi Bhatt","doi":"10.1515/pp-2021-0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been questioned in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with/without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies. This survey was performed to study clinicians' practice about ERAS in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey, comprising 76 questions on elements of prehabilitation (n=11), preoperative (n=8), intraoperative (n=16) and postoperative (n=32) management, was conducted. The respondents included surgeons, anesthesiologists, and critical care specialists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 66% (136/206 clinicians contacted). Ninety-one percent of respondents reported implementing ERAS practices. There was encouraging adherence to implement the prehabilitation (76-95%), preoperative (50-94%), and intraoperative (55-90%) ERAS practices. Mechanical bowel preparation was being used by 84.5%. Intra-abdominal drains usage was 94.7%, intercostal drains by 77.9% respondents. Nasogastric drainage was used by 84% of practitioners. The average hospital stay was 10 days as reported by 50% of respondents. A working protocol and ERAS checklist have been designed, based on the results of our study, following recent ERAS-CRS-HIPEC guidelines. This protocol will be prospectively validated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most respondents were implementing ERAS practices for patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC, though as an extrapolation of colorectal and gynecological guidelines. The adoption of postoperative practices was relatively low compared to other perioperative practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pp-2021-0117","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): a cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Geetu Bhandoria,&nbsp;Sohan Lal Solanki,&nbsp;Mrugank Bhavsar,&nbsp;Kalpana Balakrishnan,&nbsp;Cherukuri Bapuji,&nbsp;Nitin Bhorkar,&nbsp;Prashant Bhandarkar,&nbsp;Sameer Bhosale,&nbsp;Jigeeshu V Divatia,&nbsp;Anik Ghosh,&nbsp;Vikas Mahajan,&nbsp;Abraham Peedicayil,&nbsp;Praveen Nath,&nbsp;Snita Sinukumar,&nbsp;Robin Thambudorai,&nbsp;Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri,&nbsp;Aditi Bhatt\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/pp-2021-0117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been questioned in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with/without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies. This survey was performed to study clinicians' practice about ERAS in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey, comprising 76 questions on elements of prehabilitation (n=11), preoperative (n=8), intraoperative (n=16) and postoperative (n=32) management, was conducted. The respondents included surgeons, anesthesiologists, and critical care specialists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 66% (136/206 clinicians contacted). Ninety-one percent of respondents reported implementing ERAS practices. There was encouraging adherence to implement the prehabilitation (76-95%), preoperative (50-94%), and intraoperative (55-90%) ERAS practices. Mechanical bowel preparation was being used by 84.5%. Intra-abdominal drains usage was 94.7%, intercostal drains by 77.9% respondents. Nasogastric drainage was used by 84% of practitioners. The average hospital stay was 10 days as reported by 50% of respondents. A working protocol and ERAS checklist have been designed, based on the results of our study, following recent ERAS-CRS-HIPEC guidelines. This protocol will be prospectively validated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most respondents were implementing ERAS practices for patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC, though as an extrapolation of colorectal and gynecological guidelines. The adoption of postoperative practices was relatively low compared to other perioperative practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pleura and Peritoneum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pp-2021-0117\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pleura and Peritoneum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2021-0117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pleura and Peritoneum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2021-0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:腹膜恶性肿瘤患者接受细胞减少手术(CRS)伴/不伴腹腔高温化疗(HIPEC)的术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案一直受到质疑。本调查旨在探讨临床医生对CRS-HIPEC患者ERAS的做法。方法:对76个问题进行在线调查,涉及康复前(n=11)、术前(n=8)、术中(n=16)和术后(n=32)管理。受访者包括外科医生、麻醉师和重症监护专家。结果:应答率为66%(136/206名受访临床医生)。91%的受访者表示实施了ERAS实践。康复前(76-95%)、术前(50-94%)和术中(55-90%)ERAS实践的依从性令人鼓舞。84.5%的患者使用机械肠道准备。腹内引流使用率为94.7%,肋间引流使用率为77.9%。84%的从业人员采用鼻胃引流。据50%的答复者报告,平均住院时间为10天。根据我们的研究结果,根据最近的ERAS- crs - hipec指南,设计了工作方案和ERAS检查表。该方案将进行前瞻性验证。结论:虽然作为结直肠和妇科指南的外推,但大多数应答者正在为接受CRS-HIPEC的患者实施ERAS实践。与其他围手术期做法相比,术后做法的采用率相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): a cross-sectional survey.

Objectives: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been questioned in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with/without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies. This survey was performed to study clinicians' practice about ERAS in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.

Methods: An online survey, comprising 76 questions on elements of prehabilitation (n=11), preoperative (n=8), intraoperative (n=16) and postoperative (n=32) management, was conducted. The respondents included surgeons, anesthesiologists, and critical care specialists.

Results: The response rate was 66% (136/206 clinicians contacted). Ninety-one percent of respondents reported implementing ERAS practices. There was encouraging adherence to implement the prehabilitation (76-95%), preoperative (50-94%), and intraoperative (55-90%) ERAS practices. Mechanical bowel preparation was being used by 84.5%. Intra-abdominal drains usage was 94.7%, intercostal drains by 77.9% respondents. Nasogastric drainage was used by 84% of practitioners. The average hospital stay was 10 days as reported by 50% of respondents. A working protocol and ERAS checklist have been designed, based on the results of our study, following recent ERAS-CRS-HIPEC guidelines. This protocol will be prospectively validated.

Conclusions: Most respondents were implementing ERAS practices for patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC, though as an extrapolation of colorectal and gynecological guidelines. The adoption of postoperative practices was relatively low compared to other perioperative practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Do all patients that undergo a ‘complete’ secondary cytoreductive surgery for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, benefit from it? In vitro 3D microfluidic peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer model for testing different oxaliplatin-based HIPEC regimens. Ascites does not accompany pleural effusion developing under dasatinib therapy in patients with CML-CP. Active surveillance for low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) Peritoneal mestastases from rare ovarian cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1