边缘型人格障碍患者对社会包容偏见感知的自主脆弱性。

Maria Lidia Gerra, Martina Ardizzi, Silvia Martorana, Veronica Leoni, Paolo Riva, Emanuele Preti, Barbara Francesca Marta Marino, Paolo Ossola, Carlo Marchesi, Vittorio Gallese, Chiara De Panfilis
{"title":"边缘型人格障碍患者对社会包容偏见感知的自主脆弱性。","authors":"Maria Lidia Gerra,&nbsp;Martina Ardizzi,&nbsp;Silvia Martorana,&nbsp;Veronica Leoni,&nbsp;Paolo Riva,&nbsp;Emanuele Preti,&nbsp;Barbara Francesca Marta Marino,&nbsp;Paolo Ossola,&nbsp;Carlo Marchesi,&nbsp;Vittorio Gallese,&nbsp;Chiara De Panfilis","doi":"10.1186/s40479-021-00169-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) feel rejected even when socially included. The pathophysiological mechanisms of this rejection bias are still unknown. Using the Cyberball paradigm, we investigated whether patients with BPD, display altered physiological responses to social inclusion and ostracism, as assessed by changes in Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia (RSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample comprised 30 patients with BPD, 30 with remitted Major Depressive Disorder (rMDD) and 30 Healthy Controls (HC). Self-report ratings of threats toward one's fundamental need to belong and RSA reactivity were measured immediately after each Cyberball condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with BPD showed lower RSA at rest than HC. Only patients with BPD, reported higher threats to fundamental needs and exhibited a further decline in RSA after the Inclusion condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with BPD experience a biased appraisal of social inclusion both at the subjective and physiological level, showing higher feelings of ostracism and a breakdown of autonomic regulation to including social scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":48586,"journal":{"name":"Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation","volume":"8 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8600701/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autonomic vulnerability to biased perception of social inclusion in borderline personality disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Lidia Gerra,&nbsp;Martina Ardizzi,&nbsp;Silvia Martorana,&nbsp;Veronica Leoni,&nbsp;Paolo Riva,&nbsp;Emanuele Preti,&nbsp;Barbara Francesca Marta Marino,&nbsp;Paolo Ossola,&nbsp;Carlo Marchesi,&nbsp;Vittorio Gallese,&nbsp;Chiara De Panfilis\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40479-021-00169-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) feel rejected even when socially included. The pathophysiological mechanisms of this rejection bias are still unknown. Using the Cyberball paradigm, we investigated whether patients with BPD, display altered physiological responses to social inclusion and ostracism, as assessed by changes in Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia (RSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample comprised 30 patients with BPD, 30 with remitted Major Depressive Disorder (rMDD) and 30 Healthy Controls (HC). Self-report ratings of threats toward one's fundamental need to belong and RSA reactivity were measured immediately after each Cyberball condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with BPD showed lower RSA at rest than HC. Only patients with BPD, reported higher threats to fundamental needs and exhibited a further decline in RSA after the Inclusion condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with BPD experience a biased appraisal of social inclusion both at the subjective and physiological level, showing higher feelings of ostracism and a breakdown of autonomic regulation to including social scenarios.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8600701/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-021-00169-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-021-00169-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者即使融入社会也会感到被排斥。这种排斥偏向的病理生理机制尚不清楚。使用Cyberball范式,我们通过呼吸性窦性心律失常(RSA)的变化来评估BPD患者是否对社会包容和排斥表现出改变的生理反应。方法:30例BPD患者、30例重度抑郁障碍(rMDD)缓解者和30例健康对照(HC)。在每个赛博球条件后,立即测量对基本归属需求的威胁的自我报告评级和RSA反应。结果:BPD患者休息时的RSA低于HC。只有BPD患者报告了对基本需求的更高威胁,并且在纳入条件后RSA进一步下降。结论:BPD患者在主观和生理层面对社会包容的评价存在偏差,表现出较高的排斥感和对包括社会情景的自主调节的崩溃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Autonomic vulnerability to biased perception of social inclusion in borderline personality disorder.

Background: Individuals with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) feel rejected even when socially included. The pathophysiological mechanisms of this rejection bias are still unknown. Using the Cyberball paradigm, we investigated whether patients with BPD, display altered physiological responses to social inclusion and ostracism, as assessed by changes in Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia (RSA).

Methods: The sample comprised 30 patients with BPD, 30 with remitted Major Depressive Disorder (rMDD) and 30 Healthy Controls (HC). Self-report ratings of threats toward one's fundamental need to belong and RSA reactivity were measured immediately after each Cyberball condition.

Results: Participants with BPD showed lower RSA at rest than HC. Only patients with BPD, reported higher threats to fundamental needs and exhibited a further decline in RSA after the Inclusion condition.

Conclusions: Individuals with BPD experience a biased appraisal of social inclusion both at the subjective and physiological level, showing higher feelings of ostracism and a breakdown of autonomic regulation to including social scenarios.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
30
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation provides a platform for researchers and clinicians interested in borderline personality disorder (BPD) as a currently highly challenging psychiatric disorder. Emotion dysregulation is at the core of BPD but also stands on its own as a major pathological component of the underlying neurobiology of various other psychiatric disorders. The journal focuses on the psychological, social and neurobiological aspects of emotion dysregulation as well as epidemiology, phenomenology, pathophysiology, treatment, neurobiology, genetics, and animal models of BPD.
期刊最新文献
Associations between maternal personality dysfunction and emotion suppression and adolescent emotion suppression. You say it's not me: the influence of offering external explanations of rejection and acceptance behavior on the perception of benevolence in borderline personality disorder. Trajectory of Non-suicidal Self-Injury among adolescents with borderline personality disorder over a 5-year period. Feeling close to others? Social cognitive mechanisms of intimacy in personality disorders. A cluster analysis of attachment styles in patients with borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder and ADHD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1