设计一种理想的酒精基洗手液:乙醇和异丙醇溶液对改变组成的体外抗菌反应。

AAPS Open Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-22 DOI:10.1186/s41120-021-00038-x
Ifeanyi T Nzekwe, Onyedika I Agwuka, Moses U Okezie, Daniel O Fasheun, Petra O Nnamani, Chukwuma O Agubata
{"title":"设计一种理想的酒精基洗手液:乙醇和异丙醇溶液对改变组成的体外抗菌反应。","authors":"Ifeanyi T Nzekwe,&nbsp;Onyedika I Agwuka,&nbsp;Moses U Okezie,&nbsp;Daniel O Fasheun,&nbsp;Petra O Nnamani,&nbsp;Chukwuma O Agubata","doi":"10.1186/s41120-021-00038-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to achieve an in vitro quantification of the effects of composition and formulation factors on the killing rates of alcohol-based hand sanitizers. The killing rates of 85% ethyl alcohol (ET) and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) were studied under different conditions such as pH, electrolyte concentration, or inclusion of herbal extracts (cucumber, carrot, and aloe vera), a quaternary ammonium compound, or thickener over different time intervals. Changes in the activities were retested after 3 months as an indication of stability. From two-way ANOVA, both the time of exposure and the sanitizer type affected the activity against <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (<i>P</i> = 0.001 for both alcohols), whereas for <i>Escherichia coli</i>, time of exposure was significant (<i>P</i> = 0.027), while sanitizer type was less significant (<i>P</i> = 0.063)<i>.</i> Extreme pHs, the presence of ions, and the inclusion of additives such as benzalkonium chloride (BAC), plant extracts, or carbomer impacted the 3-month activity of the samples differently. Important differences existing in the activities of ET and IPA, as a function of formulation factors or use conditions have been quantified using in vitro methods. Formulations should best be tailored for particular purposes and the all-purpose hand sanitizer may not exist.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41120-021-00038-x.</p>","PeriodicalId":453,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing an ideal alcohol-based hand sanitizer: in vitro antibacterial responses of ethanol and isopropyl alcohol solutions to changing composition.\",\"authors\":\"Ifeanyi T Nzekwe,&nbsp;Onyedika I Agwuka,&nbsp;Moses U Okezie,&nbsp;Daniel O Fasheun,&nbsp;Petra O Nnamani,&nbsp;Chukwuma O Agubata\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41120-021-00038-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to achieve an in vitro quantification of the effects of composition and formulation factors on the killing rates of alcohol-based hand sanitizers. The killing rates of 85% ethyl alcohol (ET) and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) were studied under different conditions such as pH, electrolyte concentration, or inclusion of herbal extracts (cucumber, carrot, and aloe vera), a quaternary ammonium compound, or thickener over different time intervals. Changes in the activities were retested after 3 months as an indication of stability. From two-way ANOVA, both the time of exposure and the sanitizer type affected the activity against <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (<i>P</i> = 0.001 for both alcohols), whereas for <i>Escherichia coli</i>, time of exposure was significant (<i>P</i> = 0.027), while sanitizer type was less significant (<i>P</i> = 0.063)<i>.</i> Extreme pHs, the presence of ions, and the inclusion of additives such as benzalkonium chloride (BAC), plant extracts, or carbomer impacted the 3-month activity of the samples differently. Important differences existing in the activities of ET and IPA, as a function of formulation factors or use conditions have been quantified using in vitro methods. Formulations should best be tailored for particular purposes and the all-purpose hand sanitizer may not exist.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41120-021-00038-x.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAPS Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606244/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAPS Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41120-021-00038-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Open","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41120-021-00038-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在实现体外定量的成分和配方因素对醇基洗手液杀灭率的影响。研究了85%乙醇(ET)和异丙醇(IPA)在不同pH、电解质浓度、草药提取物(黄瓜、胡萝卜和芦荟)、季铵化合物或增稠剂等不同时间间隔条件下的杀虫率。3个月后重新测试活动的变化,作为稳定性的指示。通过双因素方差分析,暴露时间和消毒剂类型对金黄色葡萄球菌的活性都有影响(两种酒精均为P = 0.001),而对大肠杆菌的活性,暴露时间显著(P = 0.027),而消毒剂类型不显著(P = 0.063)。极端ph值、离子的存在以及添加苯扎氯铵(BAC)、植物提取物或卡波姆等添加剂对样品3个月的活性有不同的影响。ET和IPA活性存在的重要差异,作为配方因素或使用条件的函数,已经用体外方法进行了量化。配方最好是为特定目的量身定制的,万能洗手液可能不存在。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址:10.1186/s41120-021-00038-x。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing an ideal alcohol-based hand sanitizer: in vitro antibacterial responses of ethanol and isopropyl alcohol solutions to changing composition.

This study aimed to achieve an in vitro quantification of the effects of composition and formulation factors on the killing rates of alcohol-based hand sanitizers. The killing rates of 85% ethyl alcohol (ET) and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) were studied under different conditions such as pH, electrolyte concentration, or inclusion of herbal extracts (cucumber, carrot, and aloe vera), a quaternary ammonium compound, or thickener over different time intervals. Changes in the activities were retested after 3 months as an indication of stability. From two-way ANOVA, both the time of exposure and the sanitizer type affected the activity against Staphylococcus aureus (P = 0.001 for both alcohols), whereas for Escherichia coli, time of exposure was significant (P = 0.027), while sanitizer type was less significant (P = 0.063). Extreme pHs, the presence of ions, and the inclusion of additives such as benzalkonium chloride (BAC), plant extracts, or carbomer impacted the 3-month activity of the samples differently. Important differences existing in the activities of ET and IPA, as a function of formulation factors or use conditions have been quantified using in vitro methods. Formulations should best be tailored for particular purposes and the all-purpose hand sanitizer may not exist.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41120-021-00038-x.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization, stability, and skin application of astaxanthin particulates A controlled vocabulary and taxonomy for the submission of quality attributes for therapeutic proteins An in-silico approach towards multivariate acceptable ranges in biopharmaceutical manufacturing Recent progress of small-molecule of RET inhibitors against Non-small cell lung cancer Falsified and problematic methandienone products available online: active pharmaceutical ingredient identification by portable Raman spectrometers and quantification by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–Fourier transform mass spectrometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1