储存库促肾上腺皮质激素注射改善了多发性硬化症复发的观察性研究的质量指标。

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurodegenerative disease management Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-03 DOI:10.2217/nmt-2021-0030
Jeffrey Kaplan, Tamara Miller, Matthew Baker, Bryan Due, Enxu Zhao
{"title":"储存库促肾上腺皮质激素注射改善了多发性硬化症复发的观察性研究的质量指标。","authors":"Jeffrey Kaplan,&nbsp;Tamara Miller,&nbsp;Matthew Baker,&nbsp;Bryan Due,&nbsp;Enxu Zhao","doi":"10.2217/nmt-2021-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To determine whether clinicians evaluate American Academy of Neurology (AAN) quality metrics for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse and whether repository corticotropin injection (RCI) improves clinical and patient-reported outcomes associated with these metrics at 2 and 6 months after treatment. <b>Methods:</b> A multicenter, prospective, observational registry evaluating patients receiving RCI for MS relapse (N = 125) categorized data according to AAN quality metrics involving diagnosis, disability, fatigue, cognitive impairment, depression, and quality of life. <b>Results:</b> Clinicians assessed all 11 AAN quality metrics in patients with MS relapse. Disability, fatigue, cognitive impairment, depression, and quality of life outcomes improved with RCI therapy. <b>Conclusion:</b> RCI was associated with improved quality metrics, and AAN guidelines were followed during routine RCI treatment for MS relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":"11 6","pages":"469-476"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repository corticotropin injection improves quality metrics in an observational study of multiple sclerosis relapse.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Kaplan,&nbsp;Tamara Miller,&nbsp;Matthew Baker,&nbsp;Bryan Due,&nbsp;Enxu Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/nmt-2021-0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To determine whether clinicians evaluate American Academy of Neurology (AAN) quality metrics for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse and whether repository corticotropin injection (RCI) improves clinical and patient-reported outcomes associated with these metrics at 2 and 6 months after treatment. <b>Methods:</b> A multicenter, prospective, observational registry evaluating patients receiving RCI for MS relapse (N = 125) categorized data according to AAN quality metrics involving diagnosis, disability, fatigue, cognitive impairment, depression, and quality of life. <b>Results:</b> Clinicians assessed all 11 AAN quality metrics in patients with MS relapse. Disability, fatigue, cognitive impairment, depression, and quality of life outcomes improved with RCI therapy. <b>Conclusion:</b> RCI was associated with improved quality metrics, and AAN guidelines were followed during routine RCI treatment for MS relapse.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurodegenerative disease management\",\"volume\":\"11 6\",\"pages\":\"469-476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurodegenerative disease management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt-2021-0030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurodegenerative disease management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt-2021-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:确定临床医生是否评估美国神经病学学会(AAN)多发性硬化症(MS)复发患者的质量指标,以及储存库促肾上腺皮质激素注射(RCI)是否在治疗后2个月和6个月改善与这些指标相关的临床和患者报告的结果。方法:一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性注册研究,评估接受RCI治疗多发性硬化复发的患者(N = 125),根据AAN质量指标分类数据,包括诊断、残疾、疲劳、认知障碍、抑郁和生活质量。结果:临床医生评估了MS复发患者的所有11个AAN质量指标。残障、疲劳、认知障碍、抑郁和生活质量通过RCI治疗得到改善。结论:RCI与改善的质量指标相关,在MS复发的常规RCI治疗中遵循AAN指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Repository corticotropin injection improves quality metrics in an observational study of multiple sclerosis relapse.

Aim: To determine whether clinicians evaluate American Academy of Neurology (AAN) quality metrics for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse and whether repository corticotropin injection (RCI) improves clinical and patient-reported outcomes associated with these metrics at 2 and 6 months after treatment. Methods: A multicenter, prospective, observational registry evaluating patients receiving RCI for MS relapse (N = 125) categorized data according to AAN quality metrics involving diagnosis, disability, fatigue, cognitive impairment, depression, and quality of life. Results: Clinicians assessed all 11 AAN quality metrics in patients with MS relapse. Disability, fatigue, cognitive impairment, depression, and quality of life outcomes improved with RCI therapy. Conclusion: RCI was associated with improved quality metrics, and AAN guidelines were followed during routine RCI treatment for MS relapse.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Investigation of nonmotor symptoms and their clinical correlates in patients with Parkinson's disease. Detailed investigation of the levodopa response rates in distinct motor subscores in Parkinson's disease patients with and without STN-DBS. Correction. Economic evaluation of mHealth solutions in PD: where do we stand? Advances in the management of Alzheimer's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1