Edward R Brooks, Amanda C Benson, Aaron S Fox, Lyndell M Bruce
{"title":"使用 VERT 惯性测量单元量化网球运动中的跳跃和外部负荷。","authors":"Edward R Brooks, Amanda C Benson, Aaron S Fox, Lyndell M Bruce","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2021.2009906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assesses the relationship between an inexpensive and an established inertial measurement device for the measurement of movement and jumps in netball. Twenty-five female netballers participated in this study (11 elite and 14 sub-elite). Two inertial measurement devices (Catapult ClearSky T6 and VERT Classic) were worn simultaneously during a training session. The 'Kinetic Energy' output provided by the VERT device was compared to the total PlayerLoad collected by the ClearSky T6 device. Automated total jump counts were also compared across devices. A correlation of <i>r</i> = 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.52 to 0.89) was identified between total PlayerLoad and 'Kinetic Energy'. Similarly, a correlation of <i>r</i> = 0.81 (95% CI; 0.61 to 0.91) was identified for the relationship between ClearSky T6 jump count and VERT jump count. Mean bias of 1.7 jumps (95% CI; -2.5 to 5.8) with 95% limits of agreement (-17.9 to 21.3) were found when comparing the jump counts between the ClearSky T6 and VERT devices. The correlations found in this study indicate that the VERT devices may be an accessible alternative for sub-elite athletes; however, the wide confidence intervals and limits of agreement warrant caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":49482,"journal":{"name":"Sports Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"2209-2218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying jumps and external load in netball using VERT inertial measurement units.\",\"authors\":\"Edward R Brooks, Amanda C Benson, Aaron S Fox, Lyndell M Bruce\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14763141.2021.2009906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study assesses the relationship between an inexpensive and an established inertial measurement device for the measurement of movement and jumps in netball. Twenty-five female netballers participated in this study (11 elite and 14 sub-elite). Two inertial measurement devices (Catapult ClearSky T6 and VERT Classic) were worn simultaneously during a training session. The 'Kinetic Energy' output provided by the VERT device was compared to the total PlayerLoad collected by the ClearSky T6 device. Automated total jump counts were also compared across devices. A correlation of <i>r</i> = 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.52 to 0.89) was identified between total PlayerLoad and 'Kinetic Energy'. Similarly, a correlation of <i>r</i> = 0.81 (95% CI; 0.61 to 0.91) was identified for the relationship between ClearSky T6 jump count and VERT jump count. Mean bias of 1.7 jumps (95% CI; -2.5 to 5.8) with 95% limits of agreement (-17.9 to 21.3) were found when comparing the jump counts between the ClearSky T6 and VERT devices. The correlations found in this study indicate that the VERT devices may be an accessible alternative for sub-elite athletes; however, the wide confidence intervals and limits of agreement warrant caution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2209-2218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2021.2009906\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2021.2009906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究评估了一种廉价的惯性测量设备与一种成熟的惯性测量设备在测量投球运动和跳跃方面的关系。25 名女网球运动员(11 名精英和 14 名次精英)参加了这项研究。在一堂训练课上同时佩戴了两个惯性测量装置(Catapult ClearSky T6 和 VERT Classic)。VERT 设备提供的 "动能 "输出与 ClearSky T6 设备收集的球员总负荷进行了比较。此外,还对不同设备的自动总跳跃次数进行了比较。球员总负荷与 "动能 "之间的相关性为 r = 0.76(95% 置信区间 [CI];0.52 至 0.89)。同样,ClearSky T6 跳跃次数与 VERT 跳跃次数之间的相关性为 r = 0.81(95% 置信区间 [CI];0.61 至 0.91)。在比较 ClearSky T6 和 VERT 设备之间的跳跃次数时,发现平均偏差为 1.7 次(95% CI;-2.5 至 5.8),95% 的一致性范围(-17.9 至 21.3)。本研究中发现的相关性表明,VERT 设备可能是亚精英运动员的一种可选设备;但是,较大的置信区间和一致性限制值得警惕。
Quantifying jumps and external load in netball using VERT inertial measurement units.
This study assesses the relationship between an inexpensive and an established inertial measurement device for the measurement of movement and jumps in netball. Twenty-five female netballers participated in this study (11 elite and 14 sub-elite). Two inertial measurement devices (Catapult ClearSky T6 and VERT Classic) were worn simultaneously during a training session. The 'Kinetic Energy' output provided by the VERT device was compared to the total PlayerLoad collected by the ClearSky T6 device. Automated total jump counts were also compared across devices. A correlation of r = 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.52 to 0.89) was identified between total PlayerLoad and 'Kinetic Energy'. Similarly, a correlation of r = 0.81 (95% CI; 0.61 to 0.91) was identified for the relationship between ClearSky T6 jump count and VERT jump count. Mean bias of 1.7 jumps (95% CI; -2.5 to 5.8) with 95% limits of agreement (-17.9 to 21.3) were found when comparing the jump counts between the ClearSky T6 and VERT devices. The correlations found in this study indicate that the VERT devices may be an accessible alternative for sub-elite athletes; however, the wide confidence intervals and limits of agreement warrant caution.
期刊介绍:
Sports Biomechanics is the Thomson Reuters listed scientific journal of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS). The journal sets out to generate knowledge to improve human performance and reduce the incidence of injury, and to communicate this knowledge to scientists, coaches, clinicians, teachers, and participants. The target performance realms include not only the conventional areas of sports and exercise, but also fundamental motor skills and other highly specialized human movements such as dance (both sport and artistic).
Sports Biomechanics is unique in its emphasis on a broad biomechanical spectrum of human performance including, but not limited to, technique, skill acquisition, training, strength and conditioning, exercise, coaching, teaching, equipment, modeling and simulation, measurement, and injury prevention and rehabilitation. As well as maintaining scientific rigour, there is a strong editorial emphasis on ''reader friendliness''. By emphasising the practical implications and applications of research, the journal seeks to benefit practitioners directly.
Sports Biomechanics publishes papers in four sections: Original Research, Reviews, Teaching, and Methods and Theoretical Perspectives.