亲脂与亲水他汀类药物与精神分裂症和双相情感障碍美国退伍军人的精神住院和急诊室就诊

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Pteridines Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-23 DOI:10.1515/pteridines-2020-0028
Teodor T Postolache, Deborah R Medoff, Clayton H Brown, Li Juan Fang, Sanjaya K Upadhyaya, Christopher A Lowry, Michael Miller, Julie A Kreyenbuhl
{"title":"亲脂与亲水他汀类药物与精神分裂症和双相情感障碍美国退伍军人的精神住院和急诊室就诊","authors":"Teodor T Postolache,&nbsp;Deborah R Medoff,&nbsp;Clayton H Brown,&nbsp;Li Juan Fang,&nbsp;Sanjaya K Upadhyaya,&nbsp;Christopher A Lowry,&nbsp;Michael Miller,&nbsp;Julie A Kreyenbuhl","doi":"10.1515/pteridines-2020-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective –: </strong>Psychiatric hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits are costly, stigmatizing, and often ineffective. Given the immune and kynurenine activation in bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia, as well as the immune-modulatory effects of statins, we aimed to compare the relative risk (RRs) of psychiatric hospitalizations and ED visits between individuals prescribed lipophilic vs. hydrophilic statins vs. no statins. We hypothesized (a) reduced rates of hospitalization and ER utilization with statins versus no statins and (b) differences in outcomes between statins, as lipophilia increases the capability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier with potentially beneficial neuroimmune, antioxidant, neuroprotective, neurotrophic, and endothelial stabilizing effects, and, in contrast, potentially detrimental decreases in brain cholesterol concentrations leading to serotoninergic dysfunction, changes in membrane lipid composition, thus affecting ion channels and receptors.</p><p><strong>Methods –: </strong>We used VA service utilization data from October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2015. The RRs for psychiatric hospitalization and ED visits, were estimated using robust Poisson regression analyses. The number of individuals analyzed was 683,129.</p><p><strong>Results –: </strong>Individuals with schizophrenia and BD who received prescriptions for either lipophilic or hydrophilic statins had a lower RR of psychiatric hospitalization or ED visits relative to nonstatin controls. Hydrophilic statins were significantly associated with lower RRs of psychiatric hospitalization but not of ED visits, compared to lipophilic statins.</p><p><strong>Conclusion –: </strong>The reduction in psychiatric hospitalizations in statin users (vs. nonusers) should be interpreted cautiously, as it carries a high risk of confounding by indication. While the lower RR of psychiatric hospitalizations in hydrophilic statins relative to the lipophilic statins is relatively bias free, the finding bears replication in a specifically designed study. If replicated, important clinical implications for personalizing statin treatment in patients with mental illness, investigating add-on statins for improved therapeutic control, and mechanistic exploration for identifying new treatment targets are natural next steps.</p>","PeriodicalId":20792,"journal":{"name":"Pteridines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654264/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lipophilic vs. hydrophilic statins and psychiatric hospitalizations and emergency room visits in US Veterans with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Teodor T Postolache,&nbsp;Deborah R Medoff,&nbsp;Clayton H Brown,&nbsp;Li Juan Fang,&nbsp;Sanjaya K Upadhyaya,&nbsp;Christopher A Lowry,&nbsp;Michael Miller,&nbsp;Julie A Kreyenbuhl\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/pteridines-2020-0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective –: </strong>Psychiatric hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits are costly, stigmatizing, and often ineffective. Given the immune and kynurenine activation in bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia, as well as the immune-modulatory effects of statins, we aimed to compare the relative risk (RRs) of psychiatric hospitalizations and ED visits between individuals prescribed lipophilic vs. hydrophilic statins vs. no statins. We hypothesized (a) reduced rates of hospitalization and ER utilization with statins versus no statins and (b) differences in outcomes between statins, as lipophilia increases the capability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier with potentially beneficial neuroimmune, antioxidant, neuroprotective, neurotrophic, and endothelial stabilizing effects, and, in contrast, potentially detrimental decreases in brain cholesterol concentrations leading to serotoninergic dysfunction, changes in membrane lipid composition, thus affecting ion channels and receptors.</p><p><strong>Methods –: </strong>We used VA service utilization data from October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2015. The RRs for psychiatric hospitalization and ED visits, were estimated using robust Poisson regression analyses. The number of individuals analyzed was 683,129.</p><p><strong>Results –: </strong>Individuals with schizophrenia and BD who received prescriptions for either lipophilic or hydrophilic statins had a lower RR of psychiatric hospitalization or ED visits relative to nonstatin controls. Hydrophilic statins were significantly associated with lower RRs of psychiatric hospitalization but not of ED visits, compared to lipophilic statins.</p><p><strong>Conclusion –: </strong>The reduction in psychiatric hospitalizations in statin users (vs. nonusers) should be interpreted cautiously, as it carries a high risk of confounding by indication. While the lower RR of psychiatric hospitalizations in hydrophilic statins relative to the lipophilic statins is relatively bias free, the finding bears replication in a specifically designed study. If replicated, important clinical implications for personalizing statin treatment in patients with mental illness, investigating add-on statins for improved therapeutic control, and mechanistic exploration for identifying new treatment targets are natural next steps.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pteridines\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654264/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pteridines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/pteridines-2020-0028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pteridines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pteridines-2020-0028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:精神科住院和急诊科(ED)就诊是昂贵的,污名化的,往往是无效的。考虑到双相情感障碍(BD)和精神分裂症的免疫和犬尿氨酸激活,以及他汀类药物的免疫调节作用,我们的目的是比较服用亲脂、亲水和非他汀类药物的个体在精神病住院和ED就诊的相对风险(rr)。我们假设(a)与不使用他汀类药物相比,他汀类药物的住院率和ER利用率降低;(b)他汀类药物之间的结果差异,因为嗜脂性增加了穿透血脑屏障的能力,具有潜在的有益的神经免疫、抗氧化、神经保护、神经营养和内皮稳定作用,相反,潜在的有害的脑胆固醇浓度降低导致血清素功能障碍。改变膜脂组成,从而影响离子通道和受体。方法:我们使用2010年10月1日至2015年9月30日的VA服务利用数据。使用稳健泊松回归分析估计精神科住院和急诊科就诊的rr。分析的个体数量为683,129。结果:与非他汀类药物对照组相比,接受亲脂或亲水他汀类药物处方的精神分裂症和双相障碍患者精神病住院或急诊科就诊的RR较低。与亲脂他汀类药物相比,亲水他汀类药物与精神病住院的低rr显著相关,但与急诊科就诊无关。结论:他汀类药物服用者(与非服用者相比)精神病住院率的降低应谨慎解释,因为它具有较高的适应症混淆风险。虽然亲水他汀类药物相对于亲脂他汀类药物的精神病住院风险相对较低,但这一发现需要在一项专门设计的研究中得到证实。如果实验成功,那么对精神疾病患者个性化他汀类药物治疗的重要临床意义,研究他汀类药物的附加治疗控制,以及确定新的治疗靶点的机制探索将是自然的下一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lipophilic vs. hydrophilic statins and psychiatric hospitalizations and emergency room visits in US Veterans with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Objective –: Psychiatric hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits are costly, stigmatizing, and often ineffective. Given the immune and kynurenine activation in bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia, as well as the immune-modulatory effects of statins, we aimed to compare the relative risk (RRs) of psychiatric hospitalizations and ED visits between individuals prescribed lipophilic vs. hydrophilic statins vs. no statins. We hypothesized (a) reduced rates of hospitalization and ER utilization with statins versus no statins and (b) differences in outcomes between statins, as lipophilia increases the capability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier with potentially beneficial neuroimmune, antioxidant, neuroprotective, neurotrophic, and endothelial stabilizing effects, and, in contrast, potentially detrimental decreases in brain cholesterol concentrations leading to serotoninergic dysfunction, changes in membrane lipid composition, thus affecting ion channels and receptors.

Methods –: We used VA service utilization data from October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2015. The RRs for psychiatric hospitalization and ED visits, were estimated using robust Poisson regression analyses. The number of individuals analyzed was 683,129.

Results –: Individuals with schizophrenia and BD who received prescriptions for either lipophilic or hydrophilic statins had a lower RR of psychiatric hospitalization or ED visits relative to nonstatin controls. Hydrophilic statins were significantly associated with lower RRs of psychiatric hospitalization but not of ED visits, compared to lipophilic statins.

Conclusion –: The reduction in psychiatric hospitalizations in statin users (vs. nonusers) should be interpreted cautiously, as it carries a high risk of confounding by indication. While the lower RR of psychiatric hospitalizations in hydrophilic statins relative to the lipophilic statins is relatively bias free, the finding bears replication in a specifically designed study. If replicated, important clinical implications for personalizing statin treatment in patients with mental illness, investigating add-on statins for improved therapeutic control, and mechanistic exploration for identifying new treatment targets are natural next steps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pteridines
Pteridines 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pteridines is an open acess international quarterly journal dealing with all aspects of pteridine research. Pteridines are heterocyclic fused ring compounds involved in a wide range of biological functions from the color on butterfly wings to cofactors in enzyme catalysis to essential vitamins. Of the pteridines, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin is the necessary cofactor of several aromatic amino acid monoxygenases, the nitric oxide synthases and glyceryl ether monoxygenase (GEMO). Neopterin plays an essential role in the immune system and is an important biomarker in laboratory medicine for diseases such as HIV, cardiovascular disease, malignant tumors, among others. Topics: -Neopterin, dihydroneopterin, monapterin- Biopterin, tetrahydrobiopterin- Folates, antifolates, riboflavin- Phenylalanine, tyrosine, phenylketonuria, serotonin, adrenalin, noradrenalin, L-DOPA, dopamine, related biogenic amines- Phenylalanine hydroxylase, tyrosine hydroxylase, tryptophan hydroxylase, nitric oxide synthases (iNOS), alkylglycerol monooxygenase (AGMO), dihydropterin reductase, sepiapterin reductase- Homocysteine, mediators of inflammation, redox systems, iron.
期刊最新文献
The advent of phyllobilins as bioactive phytochemicals – natural compounds derived from chlorophyll in medicinal plants and food with immunomodulatory activities Effect of NB-UVB therapy on IL-6 and neopterin levels in patients with psoriasis Serum homocysteine level was elevated in ulcerative colitis and can be applied as diagnostic biomarker Association between plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) and strokes: A meta-analysis Immunopterin: A prospective therapy and preventative to fight COVID-19?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1