患者特异性材料特性对动脉瘤壁应力的影响:有限元研究。

Q3 Medicine Journal of Heart Valve Disease Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Zhongjie Wang, Yue Xuan, Julius M Guccione, Elaine E Tseng, Liang Ge
{"title":"患者特异性材料特性对动脉瘤壁应力的影响:有限元研究。","authors":"Zhongjie Wang,&nbsp;Yue Xuan,&nbsp;Julius M Guccione,&nbsp;Elaine E Tseng,&nbsp;Liang Ge","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Finite element analysis (FEA) can be used to determine ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (aTAA) wall stress as a potential biomechanical predictor of dissection. FEA is dependent upon zero-pressure three-dimensional geometry, patient-specific material properties, wall thickness, and hemodynamic loading conditions. Unfortunately, determining material properties on unoperated patients using non-invasive means is challenging; and we have previously demonstrated significant material property differences among aTAA patients. Our study objective was to determine the impact of patient-specific material properties on aTAA wall stress. Using FEA, we investigated if patient-specific wall stress could be reasonably predicted using population-averaged material properties, which would greatly simplify dissection prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ATAA patients (n=15) with both computed tomography (CT) imaging and surgical aTAA specimens were recruited. Patient-specific aTAA CT geometries were meshed and pre-stress geometries determined as previously described. Patient-specific material properties were derived from biaxial stretch testing of aTAA tissue and incorporated into a fiber-enforced hyper-elastic model, while group-averaged material properties were estimated using mean values of each parameter. Population-averaged material properties were also calculated from literature and studied. Wall stress distribution and its magnitude were determined using LS-DYNA FEA software. Peak and averaged stresses and stress distributions were compared between patient-specific and both group- and population-averaged material property models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient-specific material properties had minimal influence on either peak or averaged wall stress compared to use of group- or population-averaged material properties. Stress distribution was also nearly superimposed among models with patient-specific vs. group- or population-averaged material properties and provided similar prediction of sites most prone to rupture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FEA using population-averaged material properties likely provides reliable stress prediction to indicate sites most prone to rupture. Population-averaged material properties may be reliably used in computational models to assess wall stress and significantly simplify risk prediction of aTAA dissection.</p>","PeriodicalId":50184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart Valve Disease","volume":"27 5","pages":"275-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593768/pdf/nihms-1747815.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Patient-Specific Material Properties on Aneurysm Wall Stress: Finite Element Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zhongjie Wang,&nbsp;Yue Xuan,&nbsp;Julius M Guccione,&nbsp;Elaine E Tseng,&nbsp;Liang Ge\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Finite element analysis (FEA) can be used to determine ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (aTAA) wall stress as a potential biomechanical predictor of dissection. FEA is dependent upon zero-pressure three-dimensional geometry, patient-specific material properties, wall thickness, and hemodynamic loading conditions. Unfortunately, determining material properties on unoperated patients using non-invasive means is challenging; and we have previously demonstrated significant material property differences among aTAA patients. Our study objective was to determine the impact of patient-specific material properties on aTAA wall stress. Using FEA, we investigated if patient-specific wall stress could be reasonably predicted using population-averaged material properties, which would greatly simplify dissection prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ATAA patients (n=15) with both computed tomography (CT) imaging and surgical aTAA specimens were recruited. Patient-specific aTAA CT geometries were meshed and pre-stress geometries determined as previously described. Patient-specific material properties were derived from biaxial stretch testing of aTAA tissue and incorporated into a fiber-enforced hyper-elastic model, while group-averaged material properties were estimated using mean values of each parameter. Population-averaged material properties were also calculated from literature and studied. Wall stress distribution and its magnitude were determined using LS-DYNA FEA software. Peak and averaged stresses and stress distributions were compared between patient-specific and both group- and population-averaged material property models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient-specific material properties had minimal influence on either peak or averaged wall stress compared to use of group- or population-averaged material properties. Stress distribution was also nearly superimposed among models with patient-specific vs. group- or population-averaged material properties and provided similar prediction of sites most prone to rupture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FEA using population-averaged material properties likely provides reliable stress prediction to indicate sites most prone to rupture. Population-averaged material properties may be reliably used in computational models to assess wall stress and significantly simplify risk prediction of aTAA dissection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Heart Valve Disease\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"275-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593768/pdf/nihms-1747815.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Heart Valve Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart Valve Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有限元分析(FEA)可用于确定升胸主动脉瘤(aTAA)壁应力作为潜在的生物力学预测指标。有限元分析取决于零压力三维几何形状、患者特定材料特性、壁厚和血流动力学加载条件。不幸的是,使用非侵入性方法确定未手术患者的材料特性具有挑战性;我们之前已经证明了aTAA患者的物质特性存在显著差异。我们的研究目的是确定患者特异性材料特性对aTAA壁应力的影响。通过有限元分析,我们研究了使用群体平均材料性能是否可以合理地预测患者特定的壁应力,这将大大简化解剖预测。方法:选取ATAA患者(n=15),同时有计算机断层扫描(CT)和手术标本。根据患者的aTAA CT几何形状进行网格划分,并按照前面的描述确定预应力几何形状。患者特异性材料性能来源于aTAA组织的双轴拉伸测试,并纳入纤维增强超弹性模型,同时使用每个参数的平均值估计组平均材料性能。根据文献计算了材料的总体平均性能并进行了研究。采用LS-DYNA有限元分析软件确定了壁面应力分布及其大小。峰值和平均应力以及应力分布在患者特定模型和群体和群体平均材料特性模型之间进行了比较。结果:与使用群体或群体平均材料特性相比,患者特异性材料特性对峰值或平均壁应力的影响最小。应力分布也几乎重叠在模型中,患者特异性与群体或群体平均材料性能,并提供类似的预测最容易破裂的部位。结论:采用总体平均材料特性的有限元分析可能提供可靠的应力预测,以指示最容易破裂的部位。总体平均材料性能可以可靠地用于计算模型来评估壁应力,并显着简化aTAA解剖的风险预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Patient-Specific Material Properties on Aneurysm Wall Stress: Finite Element Study.

Background: Finite element analysis (FEA) can be used to determine ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (aTAA) wall stress as a potential biomechanical predictor of dissection. FEA is dependent upon zero-pressure three-dimensional geometry, patient-specific material properties, wall thickness, and hemodynamic loading conditions. Unfortunately, determining material properties on unoperated patients using non-invasive means is challenging; and we have previously demonstrated significant material property differences among aTAA patients. Our study objective was to determine the impact of patient-specific material properties on aTAA wall stress. Using FEA, we investigated if patient-specific wall stress could be reasonably predicted using population-averaged material properties, which would greatly simplify dissection prediction.

Methods: ATAA patients (n=15) with both computed tomography (CT) imaging and surgical aTAA specimens were recruited. Patient-specific aTAA CT geometries were meshed and pre-stress geometries determined as previously described. Patient-specific material properties were derived from biaxial stretch testing of aTAA tissue and incorporated into a fiber-enforced hyper-elastic model, while group-averaged material properties were estimated using mean values of each parameter. Population-averaged material properties were also calculated from literature and studied. Wall stress distribution and its magnitude were determined using LS-DYNA FEA software. Peak and averaged stresses and stress distributions were compared between patient-specific and both group- and population-averaged material property models.

Results: Patient-specific material properties had minimal influence on either peak or averaged wall stress compared to use of group- or population-averaged material properties. Stress distribution was also nearly superimposed among models with patient-specific vs. group- or population-averaged material properties and provided similar prediction of sites most prone to rupture.

Conclusions: FEA using population-averaged material properties likely provides reliable stress prediction to indicate sites most prone to rupture. Population-averaged material properties may be reliably used in computational models to assess wall stress and significantly simplify risk prediction of aTAA dissection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Heart Valve Disease
Journal of Heart Valve Disease 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Heart Valve Disease (ISSN 0966-8519) is the official journal of The Society for Heart Valve Disease. It is indexed/abstracted by Index Medicus, Medline, Medlar, PubMed, Science Citation Index, Scisearch, Research Alert, Biomedical Products, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine. It is issued bi-monthly in one indexed volume by ICR Publishers Ltd., Crispin House, 12A South Approach, Moor Park, Northwood HA6 2ET, United Kingdom. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI standard Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).
期刊最新文献
ABO Blood Group: A Risk Factor for a Cardiovascular Disease in Adults in Morocco Anti-Hypertensive Medication in Geriatric Population with HFpEF Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients with STEMI in Croatia and Kosovo Radiofrequency Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias on Bioprosthetic Valve, a Never Found Case Before An Interesting Case of Heart Failure in a Patient with Bicuspid Aortic Valve - Unveiling the Diagnosis of Amyloidosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1