2020年3月至6月古巴哈瓦那无症状SARS-CoV-2感染:流行病学意义

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Medicc Review Pub Date : 2022-01-31 DOI:10.37757/MR2022.V24.N1.4
Elba Cruz-Rodríguez, Waldemar Baldoquín-Rodríguez, Niurka Molina-Águila, Belkys M Galindo-Santana, Manuel Romero-Placeres, Tania M González-Gross, Isabela Morgado-Vega, Yadira Olivera-Nodarse, María Guadalupe-Guzmán
{"title":"2020年3月至6月古巴哈瓦那无症状SARS-CoV-2感染:流行病学意义","authors":"Elba Cruz-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Waldemar Baldoquín-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Niurka Molina-Águila,&nbsp;Belkys M Galindo-Santana,&nbsp;Manuel Romero-Placeres,&nbsp;Tania M González-Gross,&nbsp;Isabela Morgado-Vega,&nbsp;Yadira Olivera-Nodarse,&nbsp;María Guadalupe-Guzmán","doi":"10.37757/MR2022.V24.N1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The percentage of asymptomatic COVID-19 cases worldwide is estimated at 18-50%; 53% in Cuba specifically, and 58% in Havana, the Cuban capital and the 2020 epicenter of the country's COVID-19 epidemic. These figures, however, do not represent the transmission capacity or behavior of asymptomatic cases. Understanding asymptomatic transmission's contribution to SARS-CoV-2 spread is of great importance to disease control and prevention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identify the epidemiological implications of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in Havana, Cuba, during the first wave of the epidemic in 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a cross-sectional study of all confirmed COVID-19 cases diagnosed in Havana, Cuba, from March 16 through June 30, 2020. The information was obtained through review of the standardized form for investigation of suspected and confirmed cases. Examined variables included age, sex, occupation, case type and source of infection. Cases were divided into asymptomatic and symptomatic groups, and transmission was characterized through the creation of a contact matrix. Analysis was carried out in Epidat and R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 1287 confirmed cases, of which 57.7% (743) were asymptomatic, and 42.3% (544) were symptomatic. Symptomatic presentation was the most common for both imported and introduced cases, while asymptomatic presentation was more common in autochthonic cases and infections from an undetermined source. Asymptomatic infection was more common in groups aged &#10216;20 and 20-59 years, while symptomatic infection was more common in those aged &#10217;60 years. In the contact matrix, 34.6% of cases (445/1287) were not tied to other cases, and 65.4% (842/1287) were infectious-infected dyads, with symptomatic-symptomatic being the most common combination. The majority of primary cases (78.5%; 1002/1276) did not generate secondary cases, and 85.6% (658/743) of asymptomatic cases did not lead to other cases (although one asymptomatic superspreader led to 90 cases in a single event). However, 63.2% (344/544) of symptomatic primary cases generated secondary cases, and 11 symptomatic superspreaders spawned 100 secondary cases in different events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was the most common form of COVID-19 in Havana during the study period, but its capacity for contagion was lower than that of symptomatic individuals. Superspreader events under specific conditions played an important role in sustaining the epidemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":49835,"journal":{"name":"Medicc Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"21-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Havana, Cuba, March-June 2020: Epidemiological Implications.\",\"authors\":\"Elba Cruz-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Waldemar Baldoquín-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Niurka Molina-Águila,&nbsp;Belkys M Galindo-Santana,&nbsp;Manuel Romero-Placeres,&nbsp;Tania M González-Gross,&nbsp;Isabela Morgado-Vega,&nbsp;Yadira Olivera-Nodarse,&nbsp;María Guadalupe-Guzmán\",\"doi\":\"10.37757/MR2022.V24.N1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The percentage of asymptomatic COVID-19 cases worldwide is estimated at 18-50%; 53% in Cuba specifically, and 58% in Havana, the Cuban capital and the 2020 epicenter of the country's COVID-19 epidemic. These figures, however, do not represent the transmission capacity or behavior of asymptomatic cases. Understanding asymptomatic transmission's contribution to SARS-CoV-2 spread is of great importance to disease control and prevention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identify the epidemiological implications of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in Havana, Cuba, during the first wave of the epidemic in 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a cross-sectional study of all confirmed COVID-19 cases diagnosed in Havana, Cuba, from March 16 through June 30, 2020. The information was obtained through review of the standardized form for investigation of suspected and confirmed cases. Examined variables included age, sex, occupation, case type and source of infection. Cases were divided into asymptomatic and symptomatic groups, and transmission was characterized through the creation of a contact matrix. Analysis was carried out in Epidat and R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 1287 confirmed cases, of which 57.7% (743) were asymptomatic, and 42.3% (544) were symptomatic. Symptomatic presentation was the most common for both imported and introduced cases, while asymptomatic presentation was more common in autochthonic cases and infections from an undetermined source. Asymptomatic infection was more common in groups aged &#10216;20 and 20-59 years, while symptomatic infection was more common in those aged &#10217;60 years. In the contact matrix, 34.6% of cases (445/1287) were not tied to other cases, and 65.4% (842/1287) were infectious-infected dyads, with symptomatic-symptomatic being the most common combination. The majority of primary cases (78.5%; 1002/1276) did not generate secondary cases, and 85.6% (658/743) of asymptomatic cases did not lead to other cases (although one asymptomatic superspreader led to 90 cases in a single event). However, 63.2% (344/544) of symptomatic primary cases generated secondary cases, and 11 symptomatic superspreaders spawned 100 secondary cases in different events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was the most common form of COVID-19 in Havana during the study period, but its capacity for contagion was lower than that of symptomatic individuals. Superspreader events under specific conditions played an important role in sustaining the epidemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicc Review\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"21-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicc Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37757/MR2022.V24.N1.4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicc Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37757/MR2022.V24.N1.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:全球无症状COVID-19病例百分比估计为18-50%;具体来说,古巴占53%,古巴首都哈瓦那占58%,哈瓦那是2020年该国COVID-19流行病的中心。然而,这些数字并不代表无症状病例的传播能力或行为。了解无症状传播对新冠病毒传播的作用,对疾病防控具有重要意义。目的:探讨2020年第一波疫情期间古巴哈瓦那无症状SARS-CoV-2感染的流行病学意义。方法:我们对2020年3月16日至6月30日在古巴哈瓦那确诊的所有COVID-19确诊病例进行了横断面研究。这些信息是通过审查调查疑似病例和确诊病例的标准化表格获得的。检查的变量包括年龄、性别、职业、病例类型和感染源。病例被分为无症状组和有症状组,并通过建立接触者矩阵来确定传播特征。结果:共纳入确诊病例1287例,无症状者占57.7%(743例),有症状者占42.3%(544例)。在输入性和引入性病例中,症状表现最为常见,而在本土病例和来源不明的感染中,无症状表现更为常见。无症状感染以20岁和20-59岁年龄组多见,有症状感染以60岁年龄组多见。在接触者矩阵中,34.6%(445/1287)的病例没有与其他病例联系,65.4%(842/1287)的病例为感染双体,症状-症状组合是最常见的组合。多数原发病例(78.5%;1002/1276)未产生继发性病例,85.6%(658/743)的无症状病例未导致其他病例(尽管一名无症状超级传播者在一次事件中导致90例)。但在不同事件中,63.2%(344/544)有症状的原发病例产生了继发病例,11例有症状的超级传播者产生了100例继发病例。结论:无症状的SARS-CoV-2感染是研究期间哈瓦那最常见的COVID-19感染形式,但其传染能力低于有症状个体。特定条件下的超级传播者事件在维持流行病方面发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Havana, Cuba, March-June 2020: Epidemiological Implications.

Introduction: The percentage of asymptomatic COVID-19 cases worldwide is estimated at 18-50%; 53% in Cuba specifically, and 58% in Havana, the Cuban capital and the 2020 epicenter of the country's COVID-19 epidemic. These figures, however, do not represent the transmission capacity or behavior of asymptomatic cases. Understanding asymptomatic transmission's contribution to SARS-CoV-2 spread is of great importance to disease control and prevention.

Objective: Identify the epidemiological implications of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in Havana, Cuba, during the first wave of the epidemic in 2020.

Methods: We carried out a cross-sectional study of all confirmed COVID-19 cases diagnosed in Havana, Cuba, from March 16 through June 30, 2020. The information was obtained through review of the standardized form for investigation of suspected and confirmed cases. Examined variables included age, sex, occupation, case type and source of infection. Cases were divided into asymptomatic and symptomatic groups, and transmission was characterized through the creation of a contact matrix. Analysis was carried out in Epidat and R.

Results: We studied 1287 confirmed cases, of which 57.7% (743) were asymptomatic, and 42.3% (544) were symptomatic. Symptomatic presentation was the most common for both imported and introduced cases, while asymptomatic presentation was more common in autochthonic cases and infections from an undetermined source. Asymptomatic infection was more common in groups aged ⟨20 and 20-59 years, while symptomatic infection was more common in those aged ⟩60 years. In the contact matrix, 34.6% of cases (445/1287) were not tied to other cases, and 65.4% (842/1287) were infectious-infected dyads, with symptomatic-symptomatic being the most common combination. The majority of primary cases (78.5%; 1002/1276) did not generate secondary cases, and 85.6% (658/743) of asymptomatic cases did not lead to other cases (although one asymptomatic superspreader led to 90 cases in a single event). However, 63.2% (344/544) of symptomatic primary cases generated secondary cases, and 11 symptomatic superspreaders spawned 100 secondary cases in different events.

Conclusions: Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was the most common form of COVID-19 in Havana during the study period, but its capacity for contagion was lower than that of symptomatic individuals. Superspreader events under specific conditions played an important role in sustaining the epidemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicc Review
Medicc Review PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Uphold the highest standards of ethics and excellence, publishing open-access articles in English relevant to global health equity that offer the best of medical, population health and social sciences research and perspectives by Cuban and other developing-country professionals.
期刊最新文献
Executive Summary: Insights from Cuba's COVID-19 Vaccine Enterprise: Report from a High Level Fact-Finding Delegation to Cuba. COVID-19, Viruses and Dementia. Full Technical Report: Insights from Cuba's COVID-19 Vaccine Enterprise: Report from a High Level Fact-Finding Delegation to Cuba. Health Care is a Right, Not a Commodity: The Legacy of Dr Paul Farmer MD PhD. Validation of a New Diagnostic Index to Determine Metabolic Obesity Phenotypes in Normal-Weight Women in Early Pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1