阅读障碍高危儿童的整体阅读过程:扫描路径分析

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Annals of Dyslexia Pub Date : 2022-02-11 DOI:10.1007/s11881-021-00251-z
Olga Parshina, Anastasiya Lopukhina, Sofya Goldina, Ekaterina Iskra, Margarita Serebryakova, Vladislava Staroverova, Nina Zdorova, Olga Dragoy
{"title":"阅读障碍高危儿童的整体阅读过程:扫描路径分析","authors":"Olga Parshina,&nbsp;Anastasiya Lopukhina,&nbsp;Sofya Goldina,&nbsp;Ekaterina Iskra,&nbsp;Margarita Serebryakova,&nbsp;Vladislava Staroverova,&nbsp;Nina Zdorova,&nbsp;Olga Dragoy","doi":"10.1007/s11881-021-00251-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study presents the first systematic comparison of the global reading processes via scanpath analysis in Russian-speaking children with and without reading difficulties. First, we compared basic eye-movement characteristics in reading sentences in two groups of children in grades 1 to 5 (<i>N</i> = 72 in high risk of developmental dyslexia group and <i>N</i> = 72 in the control group). Next, using the scanpath method, we investigated which global reading processes these children adopt to read the entire sentence and how these processes differ between the groups. Finally, we were interested in the timeframe of the change in the global reading processes from the 1st to the 5th grades for both groups. We found that the main difference in word-level measures between groups was the reading speed reflected in fixation durations. However, the examination of the five identified global reading processes revealed qualitative similarities in reading patterns between groups. Children in the control group progressed quickly and by the 4th grade engaged in an adult-like fluent reading process. The high-risk group started with the beginner reading process, then similar to first graders in the control group, engaged mostly in the intermediate and upper-intermediate reading processes in 2nd to 4th grades. They reach the advanced process in the 5th grade, the same pattern preferred by the control group second graders. Overall, the scanpath analysis reveals that although there are quantitative differences in the word-level eye-tracking measures between groups, qualitatively children in the high-risk group read on par with typically developing peers but with a 3-year reading delay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"72 3","pages":"403 - 425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11881-021-00251-z.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global reading processes in children with high risk of dyslexia: a scanpath analysis\",\"authors\":\"Olga Parshina,&nbsp;Anastasiya Lopukhina,&nbsp;Sofya Goldina,&nbsp;Ekaterina Iskra,&nbsp;Margarita Serebryakova,&nbsp;Vladislava Staroverova,&nbsp;Nina Zdorova,&nbsp;Olga Dragoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11881-021-00251-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The study presents the first systematic comparison of the global reading processes via scanpath analysis in Russian-speaking children with and without reading difficulties. First, we compared basic eye-movement characteristics in reading sentences in two groups of children in grades 1 to 5 (<i>N</i> = 72 in high risk of developmental dyslexia group and <i>N</i> = 72 in the control group). Next, using the scanpath method, we investigated which global reading processes these children adopt to read the entire sentence and how these processes differ between the groups. Finally, we were interested in the timeframe of the change in the global reading processes from the 1st to the 5th grades for both groups. We found that the main difference in word-level measures between groups was the reading speed reflected in fixation durations. However, the examination of the five identified global reading processes revealed qualitative similarities in reading patterns between groups. Children in the control group progressed quickly and by the 4th grade engaged in an adult-like fluent reading process. The high-risk group started with the beginner reading process, then similar to first graders in the control group, engaged mostly in the intermediate and upper-intermediate reading processes in 2nd to 4th grades. They reach the advanced process in the 5th grade, the same pattern preferred by the control group second graders. Overall, the scanpath analysis reveals that although there are quantitative differences in the word-level eye-tracking measures between groups, qualitatively children in the high-risk group read on par with typically developing peers but with a 3-year reading delay.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Dyslexia\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"403 - 425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11881-021-00251-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Dyslexia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-021-00251-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-021-00251-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

该研究首次通过扫描路径分析对有阅读困难和无阅读困难的俄语儿童的全球阅读过程进行了系统比较。首先,我们比较了1至5年级两组儿童在阅读句子时的基本眼动特征(N = 72例发育性阅读障碍高危人群和N = 对照组72例)。接下来,我们使用扫描路径方法,调查了这些孩子阅读整句话时采用的全局阅读过程,以及这些过程在不同组之间的差异。最后,我们对两组学生从一年级到五年级的全球阅读过程变化的时间框架感兴趣。我们发现,两组之间单词水平测量的主要差异是阅读速度反映在注视持续时间上。然而,对五个已确定的全球阅读过程的研究表明,群体之间的阅读模式在质量上有相似之处。对照组的孩子进步很快,到了四年级时,他们就开始了成人般流利的阅读过程。高危组从初级阅读过程开始,然后与对照组的一年级学生相似,在2-4年级时主要参与中级和中高级阅读过程。他们在五年级进入高级程序,与对照组二年级学生喜欢的模式相同。总体而言,扫描路径分析显示,尽管各组之间在单词水平的眼动追踪测量方面存在数量差异,但高风险组的儿童在阅读质量上与典型的同龄人持平,但阅读延迟了3年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global reading processes in children with high risk of dyslexia: a scanpath analysis

The study presents the first systematic comparison of the global reading processes via scanpath analysis in Russian-speaking children with and without reading difficulties. First, we compared basic eye-movement characteristics in reading sentences in two groups of children in grades 1 to 5 (N = 72 in high risk of developmental dyslexia group and N = 72 in the control group). Next, using the scanpath method, we investigated which global reading processes these children adopt to read the entire sentence and how these processes differ between the groups. Finally, we were interested in the timeframe of the change in the global reading processes from the 1st to the 5th grades for both groups. We found that the main difference in word-level measures between groups was the reading speed reflected in fixation durations. However, the examination of the five identified global reading processes revealed qualitative similarities in reading patterns between groups. Children in the control group progressed quickly and by the 4th grade engaged in an adult-like fluent reading process. The high-risk group started with the beginner reading process, then similar to first graders in the control group, engaged mostly in the intermediate and upper-intermediate reading processes in 2nd to 4th grades. They reach the advanced process in the 5th grade, the same pattern preferred by the control group second graders. Overall, the scanpath analysis reveals that although there are quantitative differences in the word-level eye-tracking measures between groups, qualitatively children in the high-risk group read on par with typically developing peers but with a 3-year reading delay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
The mental health and social emotional skills of students with different learning difficulties in China. Correction: Exploring sources of reading comprehension difficulties among adolescents in Taiwan: a latent profile analysis with a focus on content‑area reading. Early akshara knowledge in beginner readers in Sinhala: a cross-sectional study. Reading subtyping of Arabic-speaking university students: a contribution to the accuracy vs. rate model of dyslexia. The effects of orthography, phonology, semantics, and working memory on the reading comprehension of children with and without reading dyslexia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1