d2 注意力测试只评估持续注意吗?涉及工作记忆过程的证据。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-08 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2021.2023152
Leandro da Silva-Sauer, Ricardo Basso Garcia, Alan Ehrich de Moura, Bernardino Fernández-Calvo
{"title":"d2 注意力测试只评估持续注意吗?涉及工作记忆过程的证据。","authors":"Leandro da Silva-Sauer, Ricardo Basso Garcia, Alan Ehrich de Moura, Bernardino Fernández-Calvo","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2021.2023152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The d2 Test of Attention (d2) is widely used for assessing sustained attention and we aimed at verifying whether working memory may be a secondary construct measured by d2. 70 university students were assessed using d2 conventional paper-and-pencil and computational version. The experimental group and control group performed the task with or without target key, respectively. Continuous Performance Test (CPT) and N-back (1 and 2-back) tasks were used to measure sustained attention and working memory, respectively. Computational d2 performance was predicted by CPT (<i>p</i> < .05; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .15) in the experimental group, and it was predicted by 2-back (<i>p</i> < .05; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .28) in the control group. Conventional d2 performance was predicted by 2-back for both control group (<i>p</i> = .01; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .20) and experimental group (<i>p</i> = .02, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .17). Results suggest the involvement of working memory in d2, possibly a secondary construct assessed by this instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":50741,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the d2 Test of Attention only assess sustained attention? Evidence of working memory processes involved.\",\"authors\":\"Leandro da Silva-Sauer, Ricardo Basso Garcia, Alan Ehrich de Moura, Bernardino Fernández-Calvo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2021.2023152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The d2 Test of Attention (d2) is widely used for assessing sustained attention and we aimed at verifying whether working memory may be a secondary construct measured by d2. 70 university students were assessed using d2 conventional paper-and-pencil and computational version. The experimental group and control group performed the task with or without target key, respectively. Continuous Performance Test (CPT) and N-back (1 and 2-back) tasks were used to measure sustained attention and working memory, respectively. Computational d2 performance was predicted by CPT (<i>p</i> < .05; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .15) in the experimental group, and it was predicted by 2-back (<i>p</i> < .05; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .28) in the control group. Conventional d2 performance was predicted by 2-back for both control group (<i>p</i> = .01; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .20) and experimental group (<i>p</i> = .02, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .17). Results suggest the involvement of working memory in d2, possibly a secondary construct assessed by this instrument.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.2023152\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.2023152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

d2 注意力测验(d2)被广泛用于评估持续注意,我们的目的是验证工作记忆是否可能是 d2 测定的二级结构。我们使用传统纸笔版和计算版 d2 对 70 名大学生进行了评估。实验组和对照组分别在有目标键或无目标键的情况下完成任务。持续表现测试(CPT)和N-back(1和2-back)任务分别用于测量持续注意力和工作记忆。在实验组中,计算 d2 成绩是由 CPT 预测的(p < .05;R2 = .15),而在对照组中,计算 d2 成绩是由 2-back 预测的(p < .05;R2 = .28)。对照组(p = .01; R2 = .20)和实验组(p = .02, R2 = .17)的常规 d2 成绩均可通过 2-back 预测。结果表明,工作记忆参与了 d2,这可能是该工具评估的次要结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does the d2 Test of Attention only assess sustained attention? Evidence of working memory processes involved.

The d2 Test of Attention (d2) is widely used for assessing sustained attention and we aimed at verifying whether working memory may be a secondary construct measured by d2. 70 university students were assessed using d2 conventional paper-and-pencil and computational version. The experimental group and control group performed the task with or without target key, respectively. Continuous Performance Test (CPT) and N-back (1 and 2-back) tasks were used to measure sustained attention and working memory, respectively. Computational d2 performance was predicted by CPT (p < .05; R2 = .15) in the experimental group, and it was predicted by 2-back (p < .05; R2 = .28) in the control group. Conventional d2 performance was predicted by 2-back for both control group (p = .01; R2 = .20) and experimental group (p = .02, R2 = .17). Results suggest the involvement of working memory in d2, possibly a secondary construct assessed by this instrument.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Detecting malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Comparative analysis of freestanding and embedded performance validity tests ERP biomarkers for go/no-go tasks to detect potential cognitive impairment in community-dwelling older adults Comparison of the GAD-7 and ImPACT symptom cluster scores in measuring anxiety among college athletes. Psychometric validation of the Italian Self-Report Symptoms inventory (SRSI): Factor structure, construct validity, and diagnostic accuracy. Exploring symptomatology and innovative treatment modalities for prefrontal cortex lesions: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1