Leandro da Silva-Sauer, Ricardo Basso Garcia, Alan Ehrich de Moura, Bernardino Fernández-Calvo
{"title":"d2 注意力测试只评估持续注意吗?涉及工作记忆过程的证据。","authors":"Leandro da Silva-Sauer, Ricardo Basso Garcia, Alan Ehrich de Moura, Bernardino Fernández-Calvo","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2021.2023152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The d2 Test of Attention (d2) is widely used for assessing sustained attention and we aimed at verifying whether working memory may be a secondary construct measured by d2. 70 university students were assessed using d2 conventional paper-and-pencil and computational version. The experimental group and control group performed the task with or without target key, respectively. Continuous Performance Test (CPT) and N-back (1 and 2-back) tasks were used to measure sustained attention and working memory, respectively. Computational d2 performance was predicted by CPT (<i>p</i> < .05; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .15) in the experimental group, and it was predicted by 2-back (<i>p</i> < .05; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .28) in the control group. Conventional d2 performance was predicted by 2-back for both control group (<i>p</i> = .01; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .20) and experimental group (<i>p</i> = .02, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .17). Results suggest the involvement of working memory in d2, possibly a secondary construct assessed by this instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":50741,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"339-347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the d2 Test of Attention only assess sustained attention? Evidence of working memory processes involved.\",\"authors\":\"Leandro da Silva-Sauer, Ricardo Basso Garcia, Alan Ehrich de Moura, Bernardino Fernández-Calvo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2021.2023152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The d2 Test of Attention (d2) is widely used for assessing sustained attention and we aimed at verifying whether working memory may be a secondary construct measured by d2. 70 university students were assessed using d2 conventional paper-and-pencil and computational version. The experimental group and control group performed the task with or without target key, respectively. Continuous Performance Test (CPT) and N-back (1 and 2-back) tasks were used to measure sustained attention and working memory, respectively. Computational d2 performance was predicted by CPT (<i>p</i> < .05; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .15) in the experimental group, and it was predicted by 2-back (<i>p</i> < .05; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .28) in the control group. Conventional d2 performance was predicted by 2-back for both control group (<i>p</i> = .01; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .20) and experimental group (<i>p</i> = .02, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .17). Results suggest the involvement of working memory in d2, possibly a secondary construct assessed by this instrument.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"339-347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.2023152\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.2023152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does the d2 Test of Attention only assess sustained attention? Evidence of working memory processes involved.
The d2 Test of Attention (d2) is widely used for assessing sustained attention and we aimed at verifying whether working memory may be a secondary construct measured by d2. 70 university students were assessed using d2 conventional paper-and-pencil and computational version. The experimental group and control group performed the task with or without target key, respectively. Continuous Performance Test (CPT) and N-back (1 and 2-back) tasks were used to measure sustained attention and working memory, respectively. Computational d2 performance was predicted by CPT (p < .05; R2 = .15) in the experimental group, and it was predicted by 2-back (p < .05; R2 = .28) in the control group. Conventional d2 performance was predicted by 2-back for both control group (p = .01; R2 = .20) and experimental group (p = .02, R2 = .17). Results suggest the involvement of working memory in d2, possibly a secondary construct assessed by this instrument.