多胎与单胎的比较:多中心KID数据库的分析。

Renjithkumar Kalikkot Thekkeveedu, Nilesh Dankhara, Jagdish Desai, Angelle L Klar, Jaimin Patel
{"title":"多胎与单胎的比较:多中心KID数据库的分析。","authors":"Renjithkumar Kalikkot Thekkeveedu,&nbsp;Nilesh Dankhara,&nbsp;Jagdish Desai,&nbsp;Angelle L Klar,&nbsp;Jaimin Patel","doi":"10.1186/s40748-021-00135-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The available data regarding morbidity and mortality associated with multiple gestation births is conflicting and contradicting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare morbidity, mortality, and length of stay (LOS) outcomes between multiple gestation (twin, triplet and higher-order) and singleton births.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the national multicenter Kids' Inpatient Database of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project from the years 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2016 were analyzed using a complex survey design using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary NC). Neonates with ICD9 and ICD10 codes indicating singletons, twins or triplets, and higher-order multiples were included. Mortality was compared between these groups after excluding transfer outs to avoid duplicate inclusion. To analyze LOS, we included inborn neonates and excluded transfers; who died inpatient and any neonates who appear to have been discharged less than 33 weeks PMA. The LOS was compared by gestational age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22,853,125 neonates were analyzed for mortality after applying inclusion-exclusion criteria; 2.96% were twins, and 0.13% were triplets or more. A total of 22,690,082 neonates were analyzed for LOS. Mean GA, expressed as mean (SD), for singleton, twins and triplets, were 38.30 (2.21), 36.39 (4.21), and 32.72 (4.14), respectively. The adjusted odds for mortality were similar for twin births compared to singleton (aOR: 1.004, 95% CI:0.960-1.051, p = 0.8521). The adjusted odds of mortality for triplet or higher-order gestation births were higher (aOR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.128-1.575, p = 0.0008) when compared to the singleton births. Median LOS (days) was significantly longer in multiple gestation compared to singleton births overall (singletons: 1.59 [1.13, 2.19] vs. twins 3.29 [2.17, 9.59] vs. triplets or higher-order multiples 19.15 [8.80, 36.38], p < .0001), and this difference remained significant within each GA category.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple gestation births have higher mortality and longer LOS when compared to singleton births. This population data from multiple centers across the country could be useful in counseling parents when caring for multiple gestation pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74120,"journal":{"name":"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554969/pdf/","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of multiple gestation births compared to singleton: analysis of multicenter KID database.\",\"authors\":\"Renjithkumar Kalikkot Thekkeveedu,&nbsp;Nilesh Dankhara,&nbsp;Jagdish Desai,&nbsp;Angelle L Klar,&nbsp;Jaimin Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40748-021-00135-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The available data regarding morbidity and mortality associated with multiple gestation births is conflicting and contradicting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare morbidity, mortality, and length of stay (LOS) outcomes between multiple gestation (twin, triplet and higher-order) and singleton births.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the national multicenter Kids' Inpatient Database of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project from the years 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2016 were analyzed using a complex survey design using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary NC). Neonates with ICD9 and ICD10 codes indicating singletons, twins or triplets, and higher-order multiples were included. Mortality was compared between these groups after excluding transfer outs to avoid duplicate inclusion. To analyze LOS, we included inborn neonates and excluded transfers; who died inpatient and any neonates who appear to have been discharged less than 33 weeks PMA. The LOS was compared by gestational age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22,853,125 neonates were analyzed for mortality after applying inclusion-exclusion criteria; 2.96% were twins, and 0.13% were triplets or more. A total of 22,690,082 neonates were analyzed for LOS. Mean GA, expressed as mean (SD), for singleton, twins and triplets, were 38.30 (2.21), 36.39 (4.21), and 32.72 (4.14), respectively. The adjusted odds for mortality were similar for twin births compared to singleton (aOR: 1.004, 95% CI:0.960-1.051, p = 0.8521). The adjusted odds of mortality for triplet or higher-order gestation births were higher (aOR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.128-1.575, p = 0.0008) when compared to the singleton births. Median LOS (days) was significantly longer in multiple gestation compared to singleton births overall (singletons: 1.59 [1.13, 2.19] vs. twins 3.29 [2.17, 9.59] vs. triplets or higher-order multiples 19.15 [8.80, 36.38], p < .0001), and this difference remained significant within each GA category.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple gestation births have higher mortality and longer LOS when compared to singleton births. This population data from multiple centers across the country could be useful in counseling parents when caring for multiple gestation pregnancies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554969/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-021-00135-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-021-00135-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

背景:关于多胎妊娠相关的发病率和死亡率的现有数据是相互矛盾的。目的:比较多胎妊娠(双胎、三胞胎和高胎)和单胎妊娠的发病率、死亡率和住院时间(LOS)。方法:采用SAS 9.4统计分析系统(SAS Institute, Cary NC)对2000年、2003年、2006年、2009年、2012年和2016年全国多中心儿童住院医疗费用与利用项目数据库数据进行复杂调查设计分析。新生儿的ICD9和ICD10代码表示单胎,双胞胎或三胞胎,以及高阶倍数。在排除转移以避免重复纳入后,比较两组之间的死亡率。为了分析LOS,我们纳入了出生的新生儿,排除了转移;在住院期间死亡的婴儿和出院时间少于33周的新生儿。对不同胎龄组的LOS进行比较。结果:采用纳入-排除标准,共分析了22,853,125例新生儿的死亡率;2.96%是双胞胎,0.13%是三胞胎或更多。共对22,690,082名新生儿进行了LOS分析。单胎、双胞胎和三胞胎的平均GA分别为38.30(2.21)、36.39(4.21)和32.72(4.14)。双胞胎与单胎的调整后死亡率相似(aOR: 1.004, 95% CI:0.960-1.051, p = 0.8521)。与单胎分娩相比,三胞胎或高阶妊娠分娩的调整后死亡率更高(aOR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.128-1.575, p = 0.0008)。与单胎分娩相比,多胎妊娠的平均LOS(天)明显更长(单胎:1.59[1.13,2.19],双胞胎:3.29[2.17,9.59],三胞胎或高次胎19.15 [8.80,36.38],p结论:与单胎分娩相比,多胎妊娠分娩死亡率更高,LOS更长。来自全国多个中心的人口数据可以在照顾多胎妊娠时为父母提供有用的咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of multiple gestation births compared to singleton: analysis of multicenter KID database.

Background: The available data regarding morbidity and mortality associated with multiple gestation births is conflicting and contradicting.

Objective: To compare morbidity, mortality, and length of stay (LOS) outcomes between multiple gestation (twin, triplet and higher-order) and singleton births.

Methods: Data from the national multicenter Kids' Inpatient Database of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project from the years 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2016 were analyzed using a complex survey design using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary NC). Neonates with ICD9 and ICD10 codes indicating singletons, twins or triplets, and higher-order multiples were included. Mortality was compared between these groups after excluding transfer outs to avoid duplicate inclusion. To analyze LOS, we included inborn neonates and excluded transfers; who died inpatient and any neonates who appear to have been discharged less than 33 weeks PMA. The LOS was compared by gestational age groups.

Results: A total of 22,853,125 neonates were analyzed for mortality after applying inclusion-exclusion criteria; 2.96% were twins, and 0.13% were triplets or more. A total of 22,690,082 neonates were analyzed for LOS. Mean GA, expressed as mean (SD), for singleton, twins and triplets, were 38.30 (2.21), 36.39 (4.21), and 32.72 (4.14), respectively. The adjusted odds for mortality were similar for twin births compared to singleton (aOR: 1.004, 95% CI:0.960-1.051, p = 0.8521). The adjusted odds of mortality for triplet or higher-order gestation births were higher (aOR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.128-1.575, p = 0.0008) when compared to the singleton births. Median LOS (days) was significantly longer in multiple gestation compared to singleton births overall (singletons: 1.59 [1.13, 2.19] vs. twins 3.29 [2.17, 9.59] vs. triplets or higher-order multiples 19.15 [8.80, 36.38], p < .0001), and this difference remained significant within each GA category.

Conclusion: Multiple gestation births have higher mortality and longer LOS when compared to singleton births. This population data from multiple centers across the country could be useful in counseling parents when caring for multiple gestation pregnancies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The fundamentals of a parental peer-to-peer support program in the NICU: a scoping review. Impact of COVID-19 in pregnancy on maternal and perinatal outcomes during the Delta variant period: a comparison of the Delta and pre-delta time periods, 2020-2021. Preterm birth, low birth weight, and their co-occurrence among women with preexisting chronic diseases prior to conception: a cross-sectional analysis of postpartum women in a low-resource setting in Ghana. The effect of mode of delivery on postpartum comfort level and breastfeeding self-efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maternal hypothyroidism and the risk of preeclampsia: a Danish national and regional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1