Sonja Kuderer, Martin Voracek, Sylvia Kirchengast, Christoph E Rotter
{"title":"手性指数实际任务(HI20):一种评估手性偏好的经济行为措施。","authors":"Sonja Kuderer, Martin Voracek, Sylvia Kirchengast, Christoph E Rotter","doi":"10.1080/1357650X.2021.1990312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>Because self-report hand preference measures are limited to investigating cognitive aspects of manual laterality, valid, easy-to-administer and economic behavioural methods are needed for capturing the motoric component of handedness. Therefore, this study introduces the Handedness Index Practical Task (HI<sub>20</sub>) and tests it in a sample of 206 students (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 23.79 years, <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 3.01 years), half of whom were self-specified left-handers. After confirming good reliabilities at the subscale and total scale levels, <i>k</i>-means cluster analysis allowed an empirically based partitioning of test subjects into left- (<i>n</i> = 72), mixed- (<i>n</i> = 23) and right-handers (<i>n</i> = 111). To validate this categorization and the HI<sub>20</sub> index, data were compared with the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI), EHI-short, HI<sub>22</sub> and hand grip strength. The congruency between the HI<sub>20</sub> clusters and alternative categorizations ranged from 95.6% to 84.0%, while the clusters explained large portions of variance in grip strength differences. The HI<sub>20</sub> sub- and total scores showed strong correlations with other measures of lateral preference. Altogether, the freely available HI<sub>20</sub> emerges as a reliable and valid alternative for behavioural handedness assessment, whose power lies in explaining differential hand use patterns and enabling fine-grained examinations of handedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47387,"journal":{"name":"Laterality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Handedness Index Practical Task (HI<sub>20</sub>): An economic behavioural measure for assessing manual preference.\",\"authors\":\"Sonja Kuderer, Martin Voracek, Sylvia Kirchengast, Christoph E Rotter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1357650X.2021.1990312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>Because self-report hand preference measures are limited to investigating cognitive aspects of manual laterality, valid, easy-to-administer and economic behavioural methods are needed for capturing the motoric component of handedness. Therefore, this study introduces the Handedness Index Practical Task (HI<sub>20</sub>) and tests it in a sample of 206 students (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 23.79 years, <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 3.01 years), half of whom were self-specified left-handers. After confirming good reliabilities at the subscale and total scale levels, <i>k</i>-means cluster analysis allowed an empirically based partitioning of test subjects into left- (<i>n</i> = 72), mixed- (<i>n</i> = 23) and right-handers (<i>n</i> = 111). To validate this categorization and the HI<sub>20</sub> index, data were compared with the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI), EHI-short, HI<sub>22</sub> and hand grip strength. The congruency between the HI<sub>20</sub> clusters and alternative categorizations ranged from 95.6% to 84.0%, while the clusters explained large portions of variance in grip strength differences. The HI<sub>20</sub> sub- and total scores showed strong correlations with other measures of lateral preference. Altogether, the freely available HI<sub>20</sub> emerges as a reliable and valid alternative for behavioural handedness assessment, whose power lies in explaining differential hand use patterns and enabling fine-grained examinations of handedness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laterality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laterality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2021.1990312\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laterality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2021.1990312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Handedness Index Practical Task (HI20): An economic behavioural measure for assessing manual preference.
ABSTRACTBecause self-report hand preference measures are limited to investigating cognitive aspects of manual laterality, valid, easy-to-administer and economic behavioural methods are needed for capturing the motoric component of handedness. Therefore, this study introduces the Handedness Index Practical Task (HI20) and tests it in a sample of 206 students (Mage = 23.79 years, SDage = 3.01 years), half of whom were self-specified left-handers. After confirming good reliabilities at the subscale and total scale levels, k-means cluster analysis allowed an empirically based partitioning of test subjects into left- (n = 72), mixed- (n = 23) and right-handers (n = 111). To validate this categorization and the HI20 index, data were compared with the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI), EHI-short, HI22 and hand grip strength. The congruency between the HI20 clusters and alternative categorizations ranged from 95.6% to 84.0%, while the clusters explained large portions of variance in grip strength differences. The HI20 sub- and total scores showed strong correlations with other measures of lateral preference. Altogether, the freely available HI20 emerges as a reliable and valid alternative for behavioural handedness assessment, whose power lies in explaining differential hand use patterns and enabling fine-grained examinations of handedness.
期刊介绍:
Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition publishes high quality research on all aspects of lateralisation in humans and non-human species. Laterality"s principal interest is in the psychological, behavioural and neurological correlates of lateralisation. The editors will also consider accessible papers from any discipline which can illuminate the general problems of the evolution of biological and neural asymmetry, papers on the cultural, linguistic, artistic and social consequences of lateral asymmetry, and papers on its historical origins and development. The interests of workers in laterality are typically broad.