“你有什么问题吗?”教医学生使用开放式短语来引出病人的问题。

Q2 Medicine Health literacy research and practice Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-13 DOI:10.3928/24748307-20211206-01
Cliff Coleman, Fernando Salcido-Torres, Rebecca E Cantone
{"title":"“你有什么问题吗?”教医学生使用开放式短语来引出病人的问题。","authors":"Cliff Coleman,&nbsp;Fernando Salcido-Torres,&nbsp;Rebecca E Cantone","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20211206-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients frequently do not understand health information received in clinical settings, yet rates of question-asking by patients are low, particularly for patients with lower health literacy skills. Experts recommend that health care professionals attempt to elicit patients' questions by using an open-ended phrase, such as \"What questions do you have?\" as opposed to a closed-ended phrase like, \"Do you have any questions?\" We compared question-eliciting techniques used during video-recorded observed structured clinical examinations among medical students who had completed a mostly didactic curriculum on health literacy and clear communication (<i>n</i> = 46) to students who completed a newer longitudinal problem-based communication curriculum (<i>n</i> = 32). Students were not aware that they were being observed for specific communication skills. Compared to controls, students in the intervention group were more likely to spontaneously attempt to elicit questions from a standardized patient (65.2% vs. 84.4%, <i>p</i> = .06), and were significantly more likely to use an open-ended phrase to do so (6.7% vs. 51.9%, <i>p</i> = .0002). The longitudinal communication skills curriculum was successful in creating long-term patient-centered question-eliciting habits. Further research is needed to determine whether eliciting questions with an open-ended technique result in patients asking more or different clarifying questions during the closing phase of clinical encounters. <b>[<i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2022;6(1):e12-e16.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":" ","pages":"e12-e16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/e1/hlrp0122colemanbr-prt.PMC8758184.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"What Questions Do You Have?\\\": Teaching Medical Students to Use an Open-Ended Phrase for Eliciting Patients' Questions.\",\"authors\":\"Cliff Coleman,&nbsp;Fernando Salcido-Torres,&nbsp;Rebecca E Cantone\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/24748307-20211206-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients frequently do not understand health information received in clinical settings, yet rates of question-asking by patients are low, particularly for patients with lower health literacy skills. Experts recommend that health care professionals attempt to elicit patients' questions by using an open-ended phrase, such as \\\"What questions do you have?\\\" as opposed to a closed-ended phrase like, \\\"Do you have any questions?\\\" We compared question-eliciting techniques used during video-recorded observed structured clinical examinations among medical students who had completed a mostly didactic curriculum on health literacy and clear communication (<i>n</i> = 46) to students who completed a newer longitudinal problem-based communication curriculum (<i>n</i> = 32). Students were not aware that they were being observed for specific communication skills. Compared to controls, students in the intervention group were more likely to spontaneously attempt to elicit questions from a standardized patient (65.2% vs. 84.4%, <i>p</i> = .06), and were significantly more likely to use an open-ended phrase to do so (6.7% vs. 51.9%, <i>p</i> = .0002). The longitudinal communication skills curriculum was successful in creating long-term patient-centered question-eliciting habits. Further research is needed to determine whether eliciting questions with an open-ended technique result in patients asking more or different clarifying questions during the closing phase of clinical encounters. <b>[<i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2022;6(1):e12-e16.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health literacy research and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e12-e16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/e1/hlrp0122colemanbr-prt.PMC8758184.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health literacy research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20211206-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health literacy research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20211206-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

患者通常不了解在临床环境中收到的健康信息,但患者提出问题的比率很低,尤其是对于健康素养较低的患者。专家建议,医疗保健专业人员尝试通过使用开放式短语来引出患者的问题,如“你有什么问题?”而不是使用封闭式短语,如,“你有问题吗?”我们比较了在完成了健康素养和清晰沟通的主要教学课程的医学生(n=46)和完成了更新的基于纵向问题的沟通课程的学生(n=32)中,在视频录制的观察结构化临床检查中使用的问题引出技术。学生们没有意识到他们被观察到有特定的沟通技巧。与对照组相比,干预组的学生更有可能自发地试图从标准化患者那里引出问题(65.2%对84.4%,p=0.06),并且更倾向于使用开放式短语(6.7%对51.9%,p=0.0002)。纵向沟通技能课程成功地培养了长期以患者为中心的提问习惯。需要进一步的研究来确定用开放式技术引出问题是否会导致患者在临床接触的最后阶段提出更多或不同的澄清问题。[HLRP:健康素养研究与实践。2022;6(1):e12-e16.]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"What Questions Do You Have?": Teaching Medical Students to Use an Open-Ended Phrase for Eliciting Patients' Questions.

Patients frequently do not understand health information received in clinical settings, yet rates of question-asking by patients are low, particularly for patients with lower health literacy skills. Experts recommend that health care professionals attempt to elicit patients' questions by using an open-ended phrase, such as "What questions do you have?" as opposed to a closed-ended phrase like, "Do you have any questions?" We compared question-eliciting techniques used during video-recorded observed structured clinical examinations among medical students who had completed a mostly didactic curriculum on health literacy and clear communication (n = 46) to students who completed a newer longitudinal problem-based communication curriculum (n = 32). Students were not aware that they were being observed for specific communication skills. Compared to controls, students in the intervention group were more likely to spontaneously attempt to elicit questions from a standardized patient (65.2% vs. 84.4%, p = .06), and were significantly more likely to use an open-ended phrase to do so (6.7% vs. 51.9%, p = .0002). The longitudinal communication skills curriculum was successful in creating long-term patient-centered question-eliciting habits. Further research is needed to determine whether eliciting questions with an open-ended technique result in patients asking more or different clarifying questions during the closing phase of clinical encounters. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2022;6(1):e12-e16.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health literacy research and practice
Health literacy research and practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Relation Between Health Literacy, Infodemic, and Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study. Health Literacy and Adherence to Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal. Association of Social Determinants of Health With Hospital Readmission and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study. Health Literacy Directed Weight Loss Intervention in Primary Care Clinics. Get Health'e': A Pilot Test of a Digital Health Literacy Intervention for Young Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1