COVID-19封锁对利雅得接受生物治疗的严重哮喘患者的影响和空气污染。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic Medicine Pub Date : 2021-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-26 DOI:10.4103/atm.atm_559_20
Khan Mohammad Ayaz, Rajendram Rajkumar, Al-Ghamdi Basma, Al-Jahdaly Emad, Al-Harbi Abdullah, Hayyan Hajar, Obaidi Mostafa Mohammad, Hamdan Al-Jahdali
{"title":"COVID-19封锁对利雅得接受生物治疗的严重哮喘患者的影响和空气污染。","authors":"Khan Mohammad Ayaz,&nbsp;Rajendram Rajkumar,&nbsp;Al-Ghamdi Basma,&nbsp;Al-Jahdaly Emad,&nbsp;Al-Harbi Abdullah,&nbsp;Hayyan Hajar,&nbsp;Obaidi Mostafa Mohammad,&nbsp;Hamdan Al-Jahdali","doi":"10.4103/atm.atm_559_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The curfews and lockdowns imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic may decreased the volume of traffic and reduced air pollution. In addition, social distancing measures may contribute to reducing infection and asthma exacerbation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess asthma control and asthma medication use among severe asthmatics on biologics before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional survey study of patients with severe asthma receiving biologic therapy at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We looked at the effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on this cohort of severe asthmatics on biologic therapy from March till June 2020 over a period of 12 weeks. We investigated changes in patients' symptoms and asthma control using the asthma control test (ACT) score and other parameters including emergency department visits, hospitalizations, use of oral prednisolone, changes in inhaler therapy, frequency of bronchodilator use, and patient perception of their symptoms before and after the lockdown period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 56, Female 39 (69%), mean age ± SD 47.4 ± 13.8 years. The duration of bronchial asthma since diagnosis ranged from 4 to 30 years. Most patients had been treated with omalizumab (47, 84%); the rest received mepolizumab (7, 12.5%) and dupilumab (2, 3.6%). All these patients had been on biologic therapy for 5 months, ranging from 5 to 120 months. Most of the patients (45, 80.4%) agreed that their symptoms of asthma had improved with biologic therapy. Most of the patients felt that overall asthma symptoms are better after curfew and lockdown 28 (50%). Less use of bronchodilators postcurfew was reported in 38% of the patients. Asthma control (≥20) using ACT score was significantly higher among patients in postcurfew and lockdown period compared to precurfew period 34 (61.7%) and 23 (41%) (<i>P</i> = 0.001), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Asthma control was better postcurfew and lockdown. A decrease in air pollution and social distances may be a contributing factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":50760,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d3/9d/ATM-16-354.PMC8588946.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on severe asthma in patients taking biologic therapy and air pollution in Riyadh.\",\"authors\":\"Khan Mohammad Ayaz,&nbsp;Rajendram Rajkumar,&nbsp;Al-Ghamdi Basma,&nbsp;Al-Jahdaly Emad,&nbsp;Al-Harbi Abdullah,&nbsp;Hayyan Hajar,&nbsp;Obaidi Mostafa Mohammad,&nbsp;Hamdan Al-Jahdali\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/atm.atm_559_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The curfews and lockdowns imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic may decreased the volume of traffic and reduced air pollution. In addition, social distancing measures may contribute to reducing infection and asthma exacerbation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess asthma control and asthma medication use among severe asthmatics on biologics before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional survey study of patients with severe asthma receiving biologic therapy at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We looked at the effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on this cohort of severe asthmatics on biologic therapy from March till June 2020 over a period of 12 weeks. We investigated changes in patients' symptoms and asthma control using the asthma control test (ACT) score and other parameters including emergency department visits, hospitalizations, use of oral prednisolone, changes in inhaler therapy, frequency of bronchodilator use, and patient perception of their symptoms before and after the lockdown period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 56, Female 39 (69%), mean age ± SD 47.4 ± 13.8 years. The duration of bronchial asthma since diagnosis ranged from 4 to 30 years. Most patients had been treated with omalizumab (47, 84%); the rest received mepolizumab (7, 12.5%) and dupilumab (2, 3.6%). All these patients had been on biologic therapy for 5 months, ranging from 5 to 120 months. Most of the patients (45, 80.4%) agreed that their symptoms of asthma had improved with biologic therapy. Most of the patients felt that overall asthma symptoms are better after curfew and lockdown 28 (50%). Less use of bronchodilators postcurfew was reported in 38% of the patients. Asthma control (≥20) using ACT score was significantly higher among patients in postcurfew and lockdown period compared to precurfew period 34 (61.7%) and 23 (41%) (<i>P</i> = 0.001), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Asthma control was better postcurfew and lockdown. A decrease in air pollution and social distances may be a contributing factor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d3/9d/ATM-16-354.PMC8588946.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_559_20\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_559_20","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间实施的宵禁和封锁可能会减少交通量,减少空气污染。此外,保持社交距离措施可能有助于减少感染和哮喘恶化。目的:本研究的目的是评估COVID-19大流行前后重症哮喘患者的哮喘控制和使用生物制剂的哮喘药物情况。方法:这是一项在沙特阿拉伯利雅得阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城接受生物治疗的严重哮喘患者的横断面调查研究。我们在2020年3月至6月的12周时间里研究了COVID-19封锁对这组严重哮喘患者生物治疗的影响。我们通过哮喘控制试验(ACT)评分和其他参数调查患者症状和哮喘控制的变化,包括急诊就诊次数、住院次数、口服强的松龙的使用、吸入器治疗的变化、支气管扩张剂的使用频率以及患者在封锁期前后对症状的感知。结果:共56例,女性39例(69%),平均年龄±SD 47.4±13.8岁。支气管哮喘自诊断以来持续时间为4 ~ 30年。大多数患者接受过omalizumab治疗(47.84%);其余患者接受mepolizumab(7.12.5%)和dupilumab(2.3.6%)治疗。所有患者均接受生物治疗5个月,时间从5个月到120个月不等。大多数患者(45,80.4%)认为生物治疗改善了他们的哮喘症状。大多数患者认为宵禁和封锁后哮喘症状总体好转(50%)。据报道,38%的患者在宵禁后较少使用支气管扩张剂。宵禁后和封锁期间使用ACT评分的哮喘控制(≥20)患者分别高于宵禁前34(61.7%)和23 (41%)(P = 0.001)。结论:宵禁和封锁后哮喘控制效果较好。空气污染和社会距离的减少可能是一个促成因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on severe asthma in patients taking biologic therapy and air pollution in Riyadh.

Background: The curfews and lockdowns imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic may decreased the volume of traffic and reduced air pollution. In addition, social distancing measures may contribute to reducing infection and asthma exacerbation.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess asthma control and asthma medication use among severe asthmatics on biologics before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional survey study of patients with severe asthma receiving biologic therapy at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We looked at the effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on this cohort of severe asthmatics on biologic therapy from March till June 2020 over a period of 12 weeks. We investigated changes in patients' symptoms and asthma control using the asthma control test (ACT) score and other parameters including emergency department visits, hospitalizations, use of oral prednisolone, changes in inhaler therapy, frequency of bronchodilator use, and patient perception of their symptoms before and after the lockdown period.

Results: A total of 56, Female 39 (69%), mean age ± SD 47.4 ± 13.8 years. The duration of bronchial asthma since diagnosis ranged from 4 to 30 years. Most patients had been treated with omalizumab (47, 84%); the rest received mepolizumab (7, 12.5%) and dupilumab (2, 3.6%). All these patients had been on biologic therapy for 5 months, ranging from 5 to 120 months. Most of the patients (45, 80.4%) agreed that their symptoms of asthma had improved with biologic therapy. Most of the patients felt that overall asthma symptoms are better after curfew and lockdown 28 (50%). Less use of bronchodilators postcurfew was reported in 38% of the patients. Asthma control (≥20) using ACT score was significantly higher among patients in postcurfew and lockdown period compared to precurfew period 34 (61.7%) and 23 (41%) (P = 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions: Asthma control was better postcurfew and lockdown. A decrease in air pollution and social distances may be a contributing factor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Medicine
Annals of Thoracic Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of chest medicine, such as adult and pediatrics pulmonology, thoracic surgery, critical care medicine, respiratory care, transplantation, sleep medicine, related basic medical sciences, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review , and more. Editorials and communications to the editor that explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with chest medicine.
期刊最新文献
Continuous positive airway pressure combined with small-tidal-volume ventilation on arterial oxygenation and pulmonary shunt during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A randomized, controlled study Cost-effective in-house COVID-19 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction testing with yeast-derived Taq polymerase Surgical management of acquired benign tracheoesophageal fistula: Technical aspects and suggestions Association between healthy lifestyles and post-COVID-19 syndrome among college students Prolonged viral shedding following COVID-19 infection in a rheumatoid patient on rituximab treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1