meta分析:自体成体干细胞在脑卒中治疗中的临床应用。

IF 1.7 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY Stem Cells and Cloning-Advances and Applications Pub Date : 2021-12-29 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/SCCAA.S344943
Noora Hassani, Sebastien Taurin, Sfoug Alshammary
{"title":"meta分析:自体成体干细胞在脑卒中治疗中的临床应用。","authors":"Noora Hassani,&nbsp;Sebastien Taurin,&nbsp;Sfoug Alshammary","doi":"10.2147/SCCAA.S344943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The disease is caused by reduced blood flow into the brain resulting in the sudden death of neurons. Limited spontaneous recovery might occur after stroke or brain injury, stem cell-based therapies have been used to promote these processes as there are no drugs currently on the market to promote brain recovery or neurogenesis. Adult stem cells (ASCs) have shown the ability of differentiation and regeneration and are well studied in literature. ASCs have also demonstrated safety in clinical application and, therefore, are currently being investigated as a promising alternative intervention for the treatment of stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven studies have been systematically selected and reviewed to determine if autologous adult stem cells are effective in the treatment of stroke. Collectively, 368 patients were enrolled across the 11 trials, out of which 195 received stem cell transplantation and 173 served as control. Using data collected from the clinical outcomes, a broad comparison and a meta-analysis were conducted by comparing studies that followed a similar study design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Improvement in patients' clinical outcomes was observed. However, the overall results showed no clinical significance in patients transplanted with stem cells than the control population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the trials were early phase studies that focused on safety rather than efficacy. Stem cells have demonstrated breakthrough results in the field of regenerative medicine. Therefore, study design could be improved in the future by enrolling a larger patient population and focusing more on localized delivery rather than intravenous transplantation. Trials should also introduce a more standardized method of analyzing and reporting clinical outcomes to achieve a better comparable outcome and possibly recognize the full potential that these cells have to offer.</p>","PeriodicalId":44934,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cells and Cloning-Advances and Applications","volume":"14 ","pages":"81-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f7/10/sccaa-14-81.PMC8721025.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-Analysis: The Clinical Application of Autologous Adult Stem Cells in the Treatment of Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Noora Hassani,&nbsp;Sebastien Taurin,&nbsp;Sfoug Alshammary\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/SCCAA.S344943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The disease is caused by reduced blood flow into the brain resulting in the sudden death of neurons. Limited spontaneous recovery might occur after stroke or brain injury, stem cell-based therapies have been used to promote these processes as there are no drugs currently on the market to promote brain recovery or neurogenesis. Adult stem cells (ASCs) have shown the ability of differentiation and regeneration and are well studied in literature. ASCs have also demonstrated safety in clinical application and, therefore, are currently being investigated as a promising alternative intervention for the treatment of stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven studies have been systematically selected and reviewed to determine if autologous adult stem cells are effective in the treatment of stroke. Collectively, 368 patients were enrolled across the 11 trials, out of which 195 received stem cell transplantation and 173 served as control. Using data collected from the clinical outcomes, a broad comparison and a meta-analysis were conducted by comparing studies that followed a similar study design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Improvement in patients' clinical outcomes was observed. However, the overall results showed no clinical significance in patients transplanted with stem cells than the control population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the trials were early phase studies that focused on safety rather than efficacy. Stem cells have demonstrated breakthrough results in the field of regenerative medicine. Therefore, study design could be improved in the future by enrolling a larger patient population and focusing more on localized delivery rather than intravenous transplantation. Trials should also introduce a more standardized method of analyzing and reporting clinical outcomes to achieve a better comparable outcome and possibly recognize the full potential that these cells have to offer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stem Cells and Cloning-Advances and Applications\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"81-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f7/10/sccaa-14-81.PMC8721025.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stem Cells and Cloning-Advances and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/SCCAA.S344943\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cells and Cloning-Advances and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/SCCAA.S344943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

中风是世界范围内死亡和残疾的主要原因。这种疾病是由流入大脑的血液减少导致神经元突然死亡引起的。中风或脑损伤后可能发生有限的自发恢复,干细胞治疗已被用于促进这些过程,因为目前市场上没有促进大脑恢复或神经发生的药物。成体干细胞(ASCs)已显示出分化和再生的能力,并在文献中得到了很好的研究。ASCs在临床应用中也证明了安全性,因此,目前正在研究作为治疗中风的一种有希望的替代干预措施。方法:系统地选择和回顾了11项研究,以确定自体成体干细胞是否有效治疗中风。总共有368名患者参加了11项试验,其中195人接受了干细胞移植,173人作为对照组。利用从临床结果中收集的数据,通过比较遵循类似研究设计的研究进行了广泛的比较和荟萃分析。结果:观察到患者临床预后的改善。然而,总体结果显示干细胞移植患者与对照组相比没有临床意义。结论:大多数试验都是早期阶段的研究,关注的是安全性而不是有效性。干细胞在再生医学领域取得了突破性的成果。因此,研究设计可以在未来通过纳入更大的患者群体并更多地关注局部输送而不是静脉移植来改进。试验还应该引入一种更标准化的方法来分析和报告临床结果,以获得更好的可比性结果,并可能认识到这些细胞所提供的全部潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meta-Analysis: The Clinical Application of Autologous Adult Stem Cells in the Treatment of Stroke.

Introduction: Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The disease is caused by reduced blood flow into the brain resulting in the sudden death of neurons. Limited spontaneous recovery might occur after stroke or brain injury, stem cell-based therapies have been used to promote these processes as there are no drugs currently on the market to promote brain recovery or neurogenesis. Adult stem cells (ASCs) have shown the ability of differentiation and regeneration and are well studied in literature. ASCs have also demonstrated safety in clinical application and, therefore, are currently being investigated as a promising alternative intervention for the treatment of stroke.

Methods: Eleven studies have been systematically selected and reviewed to determine if autologous adult stem cells are effective in the treatment of stroke. Collectively, 368 patients were enrolled across the 11 trials, out of which 195 received stem cell transplantation and 173 served as control. Using data collected from the clinical outcomes, a broad comparison and a meta-analysis were conducted by comparing studies that followed a similar study design.

Results: Improvement in patients' clinical outcomes was observed. However, the overall results showed no clinical significance in patients transplanted with stem cells than the control population.

Conclusion: Most of the trials were early phase studies that focused on safety rather than efficacy. Stem cells have demonstrated breakthrough results in the field of regenerative medicine. Therefore, study design could be improved in the future by enrolling a larger patient population and focusing more on localized delivery rather than intravenous transplantation. Trials should also introduce a more standardized method of analyzing and reporting clinical outcomes to achieve a better comparable outcome and possibly recognize the full potential that these cells have to offer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Reversal of Unobstructed Azoospermia in Rats. Assessment of the Dose-Dependent Effect of Human Platelet Lysate on Wharton's Jelly-Derived Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Culture for Manufacturing Protocols. A Comprehensive Review of Stem Cell Conditioned Media Role for Anti-Aging on Skin. Intraperitoneal Injection of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticle Accelerates Stem Cell Therapy Effects on Acute Kidney Injury [Retraction]. A Thinkful of "Alginate Beads as a Promising Tool for Successful Production of Viable and Pluripotent Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in a 3D Culture System" [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1