锚定种根噬菌intraradices(原Glomus intraradices)。

Fungal systematics and evolution Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-29 DOI:10.3114/fuse.2021.08.14
C Walker, A Schüßler, B Vincent, S Cranenbrouck, S Declerck
{"title":"锚定种根噬菌intraradices(原Glomus intraradices)。","authors":"C Walker,&nbsp;A Schüßler,&nbsp;B Vincent,&nbsp;S Cranenbrouck,&nbsp;S Declerck","doi":"10.3114/fuse.2021.08.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The nomenclatural type material of <i>Rhizophagus intraradices</i> (basionym <i>Glomus intraradices</i>) was originally described from a trap pot culture established with root fragments, subcultures of which later became registered in the INVAM culture collection as FL 208. Subcultures of FL 208 (designated as strain ATT 4) and a new strain, independently isolated from the type location (ATT 1102), were established as both pot cultures with soil-like substrate and <i>in vitro</i> root organ culture. Long-term sampling of these cultures shows spores of the species to have considerable morphological plasticity, not described in the original description. Size, shape and other features of the spores were much more variable than indicated in the protologue. Phylogenetic analyses confirmed earlier published evidence that sequences from all <i>R. intraradices</i> cultures formed a monophyletic clade, well separated from, and not representing a sister clade to, <i>R. irregularis</i>. Moreover, new phylogenetic analyses show that <i>Rhizoglomus venetianum</i> and <i>R. irregularis</i> are synonymous. The morphological characters used to separate these species exemplify the difficulties in species recognition due to the high phenotypic plasticity in the genus <i>Rhizophagus. Rhizophagus intraradices</i> is morphologically re-described, an epitype is designated from a single-spore isolate derived from ATT 4, and <i>R. venetianum</i> is synonymised with <i>R. irregularis</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":73121,"journal":{"name":"Fungal systematics and evolution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8687058/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anchoring the species <i>Rhizophagus intraradices</i> (formerly <i>Glomus intraradices</i>).\",\"authors\":\"C Walker,&nbsp;A Schüßler,&nbsp;B Vincent,&nbsp;S Cranenbrouck,&nbsp;S Declerck\",\"doi\":\"10.3114/fuse.2021.08.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The nomenclatural type material of <i>Rhizophagus intraradices</i> (basionym <i>Glomus intraradices</i>) was originally described from a trap pot culture established with root fragments, subcultures of which later became registered in the INVAM culture collection as FL 208. Subcultures of FL 208 (designated as strain ATT 4) and a new strain, independently isolated from the type location (ATT 1102), were established as both pot cultures with soil-like substrate and <i>in vitro</i> root organ culture. Long-term sampling of these cultures shows spores of the species to have considerable morphological plasticity, not described in the original description. Size, shape and other features of the spores were much more variable than indicated in the protologue. Phylogenetic analyses confirmed earlier published evidence that sequences from all <i>R. intraradices</i> cultures formed a monophyletic clade, well separated from, and not representing a sister clade to, <i>R. irregularis</i>. Moreover, new phylogenetic analyses show that <i>Rhizoglomus venetianum</i> and <i>R. irregularis</i> are synonymous. The morphological characters used to separate these species exemplify the difficulties in species recognition due to the high phenotypic plasticity in the genus <i>Rhizophagus. Rhizophagus intraradices</i> is morphologically re-described, an epitype is designated from a single-spore isolate derived from ATT 4, and <i>R. venetianum</i> is synonymised with <i>R. irregularis</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fungal systematics and evolution\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8687058/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fungal systematics and evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2021.08.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fungal systematics and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2021.08.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

根噬菌(basionym Glomus intraradices)的命名型材料最初是在用根片段建立的陷阱盆栽中描述的,其亚种后来在INVAM培养收集中被登记为FL 208。将fl208(命名为菌株ATT 4)和一株从类型位置独立分离出来的新菌株ATT 1102进行继代培养,建立了具有土壤样基质的盆栽培养和离体根器官培养。这些培养物的长期取样显示该物种的孢子具有相当大的形态可塑性,这在原始描述中没有描述。孢子的大小、形状和其他特征比原序中所示的变化更大。系统发育分析证实了早前发表的证据,即来自所有类人猿内培养的序列形成了一个单系进化枝,与不规则类人猿有很好的分离,而不是代表一个姐妹进化枝。此外,新的系统发育分析表明,威尼斯根茎霉和不规则根茎霉是同义的。用于区分这些物种的形态特征表明,由于根噬菌属的高表型可塑性,物种识别困难。从形态学上重新描述了根食菌,从at4衍生的单孢子分离物中指定了一个表型,并将R. venetianum与R. irregularis同义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anchoring the species Rhizophagus intraradices (formerly Glomus intraradices).

The nomenclatural type material of Rhizophagus intraradices (basionym Glomus intraradices) was originally described from a trap pot culture established with root fragments, subcultures of which later became registered in the INVAM culture collection as FL 208. Subcultures of FL 208 (designated as strain ATT 4) and a new strain, independently isolated from the type location (ATT 1102), were established as both pot cultures with soil-like substrate and in vitro root organ culture. Long-term sampling of these cultures shows spores of the species to have considerable morphological plasticity, not described in the original description. Size, shape and other features of the spores were much more variable than indicated in the protologue. Phylogenetic analyses confirmed earlier published evidence that sequences from all R. intraradices cultures formed a monophyletic clade, well separated from, and not representing a sister clade to, R. irregularis. Moreover, new phylogenetic analyses show that Rhizoglomus venetianum and R. irregularis are synonymous. The morphological characters used to separate these species exemplify the difficulties in species recognition due to the high phenotypic plasticity in the genus Rhizophagus. Rhizophagus intraradices is morphologically re-described, an epitype is designated from a single-spore isolate derived from ATT 4, and R. venetianum is synonymised with R. irregularis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Botryosphaeriaceae partially overlap on asymptomatic and symptomatic tissues of Anacardiaceae in agroecosystems and conservation areas in northern South Africa. Cylindrocladiella species from Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation soils in southwestern China. Mjuua agapanthi gen. et sp. nov., a biotrophic mycoparasite of Fusarium spp. A diverse range of Phytophthora species from botanical gardens in South Africa, including the novel Clade 5 species, Phytophthora mammiformis sp. nov. Response to the detection of Rugonectria castaneicola and Rugonectria wingfieldii sp. nov. on Quercus in Australia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1