用加速度计计算中风后步行能量消耗的氧耗预测方程的最佳选择。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-15 DOI:10.1177/15459683221076469
Maxence Compagnat, Jean-Yves Salle, Maria Vinti, Romain Joste, Jean Christophe Daviet
{"title":"用加速度计计算中风后步行能量消耗的氧耗预测方程的最佳选择。","authors":"Maxence Compagnat,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Salle,&nbsp;Maria Vinti,&nbsp;Romain Joste,&nbsp;Jean Christophe Daviet","doi":"10.1177/15459683221076469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of oxygen cost into the accelerometer's algorithms improves accuracy of total energy expenditure (TEE) values as post-stroke individuals walk. Recent work has shown that oxygen cost can be estimated from specific prediction equations for stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective is to the validity of the different oxygen cost estimation equations available in the literature for calculating TEE using ActigraphGT3x as individuals with stroke sequelae walk.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individuals with stroke sequelae who were able to walk without human assistance were included. The TEE was calculated by multiplying the walking distance provided by an ActigraphGT3x worn on the healthy ankle and the patient's oxygen cost estimated from the selected prediction equations. The TEE values from each equation were compared to the TEE values measured by indirect calorimetry. The validity of the prediction methods was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis (mean bias (MB) and limits of agreement (LoA) values).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 26 stroke patients (63.5 years). Among the selected equations, those of Compagnat and Polese obtained the best validity parameters for the ActigraphGT3x: MB<sub>Compagnat</sub> = 1.2 kcal, 95% LoA<sub>Compagnat</sub> = [-12.0; 14.3] kcal and MB<sub>Polese</sub> = 3.5 kcal, 95% LoA<sub>Polese</sub> = [-9.2; 16.1] kcal. For comparison, the estimated TEE value according to the manufacturer's algorithm reported MB<sub>Manufacturer</sub> = -15 kcal, 95% LoA<sub>Manufacturer</sub> = [-52.9; 22.8] kcal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Polese and Compagnat equations offer the best validity parameters in comparison with the criterion method. Using oxygen cost prediction equations is a promising approach to improving assessment of TEE by accelerometers in post-stroke individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":56104,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","volume":"36 4-5","pages":"298-305"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Best Choice of Oxygen Cost Prediction Equation for Computing Post-Stroke Walking Energy Expenditure Using an Accelerometer.\",\"authors\":\"Maxence Compagnat,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Salle,&nbsp;Maria Vinti,&nbsp;Romain Joste,&nbsp;Jean Christophe Daviet\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683221076469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of oxygen cost into the accelerometer's algorithms improves accuracy of total energy expenditure (TEE) values as post-stroke individuals walk. Recent work has shown that oxygen cost can be estimated from specific prediction equations for stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective is to the validity of the different oxygen cost estimation equations available in the literature for calculating TEE using ActigraphGT3x as individuals with stroke sequelae walk.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individuals with stroke sequelae who were able to walk without human assistance were included. The TEE was calculated by multiplying the walking distance provided by an ActigraphGT3x worn on the healthy ankle and the patient's oxygen cost estimated from the selected prediction equations. The TEE values from each equation were compared to the TEE values measured by indirect calorimetry. The validity of the prediction methods was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis (mean bias (MB) and limits of agreement (LoA) values).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 26 stroke patients (63.5 years). Among the selected equations, those of Compagnat and Polese obtained the best validity parameters for the ActigraphGT3x: MB<sub>Compagnat</sub> = 1.2 kcal, 95% LoA<sub>Compagnat</sub> = [-12.0; 14.3] kcal and MB<sub>Polese</sub> = 3.5 kcal, 95% LoA<sub>Polese</sub> = [-9.2; 16.1] kcal. For comparison, the estimated TEE value according to the manufacturer's algorithm reported MB<sub>Manufacturer</sub> = -15 kcal, 95% LoA<sub>Manufacturer</sub> = [-52.9; 22.8] kcal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Polese and Compagnat equations offer the best validity parameters in comparison with the criterion method. Using oxygen cost prediction equations is a promising approach to improving assessment of TEE by accelerometers in post-stroke individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"volume\":\"36 4-5\",\"pages\":\"298-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221076469\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221076469","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:将氧气消耗整合到加速度计的算法中,可以提高中风后个体行走时总能量消耗(TEE)值的准确性。最近的研究表明,脑卒中患者的氧耗可以通过特定的预测方程来估计。目的:目的是研究文献中使用ActigraphGT3x计算脑卒中后遗症患者TEE的不同氧耗估算方程的有效性。方法:中风后遗症患者不需人工辅助即可行走。TEE通过将佩戴在健康踝关节上的ActigraphGT3x提供的步行距离与根据所选预测方程估计的患者氧耗相乘来计算。将每个方程的TEE值与间接量热法测量的TEE值进行比较。采用Bland-Altman分析(平均偏倚(mean bias, MB)和一致限(limit of agreement, LoA))评价预测方法的有效性。结果:纳入脑卒中患者26例(63.5岁)。在所选方程中,Compagnat和Polese方程对ActigraphGT3x的效度参数最佳:MBCompagnat = 1.2 kcal, 95% LoACompagnat = [-12.0;14.3] kcal和MBPolese = 3.5 kcal, 95% LoAPolese = [-9.2;为了比较,根据制造商算法报告的估计TEE值MBManufacturer = -15 kcal, 95% loammanufacturer = [-52.9;结论:与标准法相比,Polese方程和Compagnat方程提供了最佳的效度参数。使用氧耗预测方程是改进脑卒中后加速计TEE评估的一种有前途的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Best Choice of Oxygen Cost Prediction Equation for Computing Post-Stroke Walking Energy Expenditure Using an Accelerometer.

Background: The integration of oxygen cost into the accelerometer's algorithms improves accuracy of total energy expenditure (TEE) values as post-stroke individuals walk. Recent work has shown that oxygen cost can be estimated from specific prediction equations for stroke patients.

Objective: The objective is to the validity of the different oxygen cost estimation equations available in the literature for calculating TEE using ActigraphGT3x as individuals with stroke sequelae walk.

Method: Individuals with stroke sequelae who were able to walk without human assistance were included. The TEE was calculated by multiplying the walking distance provided by an ActigraphGT3x worn on the healthy ankle and the patient's oxygen cost estimated from the selected prediction equations. The TEE values from each equation were compared to the TEE values measured by indirect calorimetry. The validity of the prediction methods was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis (mean bias (MB) and limits of agreement (LoA) values).

Results: We included 26 stroke patients (63.5 years). Among the selected equations, those of Compagnat and Polese obtained the best validity parameters for the ActigraphGT3x: MBCompagnat = 1.2 kcal, 95% LoACompagnat = [-12.0; 14.3] kcal and MBPolese = 3.5 kcal, 95% LoAPolese = [-9.2; 16.1] kcal. For comparison, the estimated TEE value according to the manufacturer's algorithm reported MBManufacturer = -15 kcal, 95% LoAManufacturer = [-52.9; 22.8] kcal.

Conclusion: The Polese and Compagnat equations offer the best validity parameters in comparison with the criterion method. Using oxygen cost prediction equations is a promising approach to improving assessment of TEE by accelerometers in post-stroke individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair (NNR) offers innovative and reliable reports relevant to functional recovery from neural injury and long term neurologic care. The journal''s unique focus is evidence-based basic and clinical practice and research. NNR deals with the management and fundamental mechanisms of functional recovery from conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer''s disease, brain and spinal cord injuries, and peripheral nerve injuries.
期刊最新文献
Altered Corticospinal and Intracortical Excitability After Stroke: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Hemodynamics of the Frontopolar and Dorsolateral Pre-Frontal Cortex in People with Multiple Sclerosis During Walking, Cognitive Subtraction, and Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task. Comparative Efficacy of Cognitive Training for Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Comparable outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures and for rotator cuff arthropathy in a predominantly asian population. A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate a Digital Therapeutic to Enhance Gait Function in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1