水果和蔬菜消费与2型糖尿病的风险:前瞻性研究的系统回顾和剂量反应荟萃分析。

IF 3.3 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Pub Date : 2021-07-02 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000218
Rine Elise Halvorsen, Mathilde Elvestad, Marianne Molin, Dagfinn Aune
{"title":"水果和蔬菜消费与2型糖尿病的风险:前瞻性研究的系统回顾和剂量反应荟萃分析。","authors":"Rine Elise Halvorsen,&nbsp;Mathilde Elvestad,&nbsp;Marianne Molin,&nbsp;Dagfinn Aune","doi":"10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between intake of fruit and vegetables and their subtypes, and the risk of type 2 diabetes has been investigated in several studies, but the results have been inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies on intakes of fruit and vegetables and fruit and vegetable subtypes and the risk of type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to 20 October 2020. Prospective cohort studies of fruit and vegetable consumption and type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. Summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 23 cohort studies. The summary RR for high versus low intake and per 200 g/day were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89 to 0.98, I<sup>2</sup>=0%, n=10 studies) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95 to 1.01, I<sup>2</sup>=37.8%, n=7) for fruit and vegetables combined, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.97, I<sup>2</sup>=9.3%, n=20) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.92 to 1.00, I<sup>2</sup>=68.4%, n=19) for fruits and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.88 to 1.02, I<sup>2</sup>=60.4%, n=17) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94 to 1.01, I<sup>2</sup>=39.2%, n=16) for vegetables, respectively. Inverse associations were observed for apples, apples and pears, blueberries, grapefruit and grapes and raisins, while positive associations were observed for intakes of cantaloupe, fruit drinks, fruit juice, brussels sprouts, cauliflower and potatoes, however, most of these associations were based on few studies and need further investigation in additional studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis found a weak inverse association between fruit and vegetable intake and type 2 diabetes risk. There is indication of both inverse and positive associations between intake of several fruit and vegetables subtypes and type 2 diabetes risk, however, further studies are needed before firm conclusions can be made.</p>","PeriodicalId":36307,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000218","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fruit and vegetable consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.\",\"authors\":\"Rine Elise Halvorsen,&nbsp;Mathilde Elvestad,&nbsp;Marianne Molin,&nbsp;Dagfinn Aune\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between intake of fruit and vegetables and their subtypes, and the risk of type 2 diabetes has been investigated in several studies, but the results have been inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies on intakes of fruit and vegetables and fruit and vegetable subtypes and the risk of type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to 20 October 2020. Prospective cohort studies of fruit and vegetable consumption and type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. Summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 23 cohort studies. The summary RR for high versus low intake and per 200 g/day were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89 to 0.98, I<sup>2</sup>=0%, n=10 studies) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95 to 1.01, I<sup>2</sup>=37.8%, n=7) for fruit and vegetables combined, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.97, I<sup>2</sup>=9.3%, n=20) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.92 to 1.00, I<sup>2</sup>=68.4%, n=19) for fruits and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.88 to 1.02, I<sup>2</sup>=60.4%, n=17) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94 to 1.01, I<sup>2</sup>=39.2%, n=16) for vegetables, respectively. Inverse associations were observed for apples, apples and pears, blueberries, grapefruit and grapes and raisins, while positive associations were observed for intakes of cantaloupe, fruit drinks, fruit juice, brussels sprouts, cauliflower and potatoes, however, most of these associations were based on few studies and need further investigation in additional studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis found a weak inverse association between fruit and vegetable intake and type 2 diabetes risk. There is indication of both inverse and positive associations between intake of several fruit and vegetables subtypes and type 2 diabetes risk, however, further studies are needed before firm conclusions can be made.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000218\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

背景:一些研究已经调查了水果和蔬菜及其亚型的摄入量与2型糖尿病风险之间的关系,但结果并不一致。目的:我们对水果蔬菜摄入量和水果蔬菜亚型与2型糖尿病风险的前瞻性研究进行了最新的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。设计:检索截止到2020年10月20日的PubMed和Embase数据库。包括水果和蔬菜消费与2型糖尿病的前瞻性队列研究。采用随机效应模型估计总相对危险度(RRs)和95% ci。结果:我们纳入了23项队列研究。高与低摄入量和每200克/天的总RR分别为水果和蔬菜组合的0.93 (95% CI: 0.89至0.98,I2=0%, n=10项研究)和0.98 (95% CI: 0.95至1.01,I2=37.8%, n=7),水果的0.93 (95% CI: 0.90至0.97,I2=9.3%, n=20)和0.96 (95% CI: 0.92至1.00,I2=68.4%, n=19),蔬菜的0.95 (95% CI: 0.88至1.02,I2=60.4%, n=17)和0.97 (95% CI: 0.94至1.01,I2=39.2%, n=16)。苹果、苹果和梨、蓝莓、葡萄柚和葡萄以及葡萄干的摄入量呈负相关,而哈密瓜、水果饮料、果汁、抱子甘蓝、花椰菜和土豆的摄入量呈正相关。然而,这些关联大多基于很少的研究,需要进一步的研究。结论:这项荟萃分析发现,水果和蔬菜摄入量与2型糖尿病风险之间存在微弱的负相关。有迹象表明,摄入几种水果和蔬菜亚型与2型糖尿病风险之间既有负相关,也有正相关,然而,在得出确切的结论之前,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fruit and vegetable consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Background: The association between intake of fruit and vegetables and their subtypes, and the risk of type 2 diabetes has been investigated in several studies, but the results have been inconsistent.

Objective: We conducted an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies on intakes of fruit and vegetables and fruit and vegetable subtypes and the risk of type 2 diabetes.

Design: PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to 20 October 2020. Prospective cohort studies of fruit and vegetable consumption and type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. Summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using a random effects model.

Results: We included 23 cohort studies. The summary RR for high versus low intake and per 200 g/day were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89 to 0.98, I2=0%, n=10 studies) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95 to 1.01, I2=37.8%, n=7) for fruit and vegetables combined, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.97, I2=9.3%, n=20) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.92 to 1.00, I2=68.4%, n=19) for fruits and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.88 to 1.02, I2=60.4%, n=17) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94 to 1.01, I2=39.2%, n=16) for vegetables, respectively. Inverse associations were observed for apples, apples and pears, blueberries, grapefruit and grapes and raisins, while positive associations were observed for intakes of cantaloupe, fruit drinks, fruit juice, brussels sprouts, cauliflower and potatoes, however, most of these associations were based on few studies and need further investigation in additional studies.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis found a weak inverse association between fruit and vegetable intake and type 2 diabetes risk. There is indication of both inverse and positive associations between intake of several fruit and vegetables subtypes and type 2 diabetes risk, however, further studies are needed before firm conclusions can be made.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Landscape analysis of environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing metrics for consumer nutrition and health in the food and beverage sector. Maternal prenatal, with or without postpartum, vitamin D3 supplementation does not improve maternal iron status at delivery or infant iron status at 6 months of age: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial Effects of behavioural change communication (BCC) on menstrual hygiene practices among urban school adolescent girls: a pilot study Physiotherapy-led telehealth and exercise intervention to improve mobility in older people receiving aged care services (TOP UP): protocol for a randomised controlled type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial Effects of a 5-week intake of erythritol and xylitol on vascular function, abdominal fat and glucose tolerance in humans with obesity: a pilot trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1