Jon W McKeeby, Patricia S Coffey, Susan M Houston, Ryan D Kennedy, Rachael Schacherer, Stacie Alboum, Steve Bergstrom, Maria D Joyce
{"title":"美国国立卫生研究院临床中心信息技术治理的演变。","authors":"Jon W McKeeby, Patricia S Coffey, Susan M Houston, Ryan D Kennedy, Rachael Schacherer, Stacie Alboum, Steve Bergstrom, Maria D Joyce","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An information technology governance (ITG) program has helped the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center (CC) in the implementation of many systems and has guided the organization through the maturity of its project management methodology. The NIHCC Department of Clinical Research Informatics (DCRI) maintains an electronic health record (EHR) called the clinical research information system (CRIS) along with many clinical information systems (CIS) and research information systems, supporting approximately 3,200 users. ITG involves establishing processes to guide the review, selection, implementation, management, and setting of the IT strategy representing the business owners, stakeholders, and IT.<sup>1</sup> Research conducted by Levstek, Hovelja, and Pucihar<sup>2</sup> identified that different organizations may need different ITG structures, frameworks, and strategies. The path to achieving strong ITG is a continuous journey. This paper reviews the evolution of the NIHCC IT governance strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":40052,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580461/pdf/phim0018-0001c.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EVOLUTION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GOVERNANCE AT THE NIH CLINICAL CENTER.\",\"authors\":\"Jon W McKeeby, Patricia S Coffey, Susan M Houston, Ryan D Kennedy, Rachael Schacherer, Stacie Alboum, Steve Bergstrom, Maria D Joyce\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An information technology governance (ITG) program has helped the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center (CC) in the implementation of many systems and has guided the organization through the maturity of its project management methodology. The NIHCC Department of Clinical Research Informatics (DCRI) maintains an electronic health record (EHR) called the clinical research information system (CRIS) along with many clinical information systems (CIS) and research information systems, supporting approximately 3,200 users. ITG involves establishing processes to guide the review, selection, implementation, management, and setting of the IT strategy representing the business owners, stakeholders, and IT.<sup>1</sup> Research conducted by Levstek, Hovelja, and Pucihar<sup>2</sup> identified that different organizations may need different ITG structures, frameworks, and strategies. The path to achieving strong ITG is a continuous journey. This paper reviews the evolution of the NIHCC IT governance strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580461/pdf/phim0018-0001c.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
THE EVOLUTION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GOVERNANCE AT THE NIH CLINICAL CENTER.
An information technology governance (ITG) program has helped the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center (CC) in the implementation of many systems and has guided the organization through the maturity of its project management methodology. The NIHCC Department of Clinical Research Informatics (DCRI) maintains an electronic health record (EHR) called the clinical research information system (CRIS) along with many clinical information systems (CIS) and research information systems, supporting approximately 3,200 users. ITG involves establishing processes to guide the review, selection, implementation, management, and setting of the IT strategy representing the business owners, stakeholders, and IT.1 Research conducted by Levstek, Hovelja, and Pucihar2 identified that different organizations may need different ITG structures, frameworks, and strategies. The path to achieving strong ITG is a continuous journey. This paper reviews the evolution of the NIHCC IT governance strategy.
期刊介绍:
Perspectives in Health Information Management is a scholarly, peer-reviewed research journal whose mission is to advance health information management practice and to encourage interdisciplinary collaboration between HIM professionals and others in disciplines supporting the advancement of the management of health information. The primary focus is to promote the linkage of practice, education, and research and to provide contributions to the understanding or improvement of health information management processes and outcomes.