大鼠神经行为模型中使用激素避孕药的方法和考虑

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.yfrne.2022.101011
Emily N. Hilz
{"title":"大鼠神经行为模型中使用激素避孕药的方法和考虑","authors":"Emily N. Hilz","doi":"10.1016/j.yfrne.2022.101011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hormonal contraceptives (HCs), prescribed to millions of women around the world, alter the ovarian hormonal cycle resulting in neurobehavioral changes in HC users. Human epidemiological and experimental data has characterized some of these effects with oftentimes conflicting or irreproducible results, reflecting a dearth of research considering different compositions, routes of administration, or time-courses of HC use. Non-human animal research can model these effects and help elucidate the underlying mechanisms by which different HCs modulate neurobehavioral outcomes. Still, animal models using HCs are not well-established. This may be because the pharmacological profile of HCs – including the metabolism, receptor binding affinity, and neuromodulatory effects – is dynamic and not always clearly translatable between animals and humans. The current review addresses these issues and provides basic methods and considerations for the use of HCs in animal models of neurobehavior to help advance the field of behavioral neuroendocrinology and inform decisions regarding to women’s health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12469,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 101011"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods and considerations for the use of hormonal contraceptives in rat models of neurobehavior\",\"authors\":\"Emily N. Hilz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yfrne.2022.101011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Hormonal contraceptives (HCs), prescribed to millions of women around the world, alter the ovarian hormonal cycle resulting in neurobehavioral changes in HC users. Human epidemiological and experimental data has characterized some of these effects with oftentimes conflicting or irreproducible results, reflecting a dearth of research considering different compositions, routes of administration, or time-courses of HC use. Non-human animal research can model these effects and help elucidate the underlying mechanisms by which different HCs modulate neurobehavioral outcomes. Still, animal models using HCs are not well-established. This may be because the pharmacological profile of HCs – including the metabolism, receptor binding affinity, and neuromodulatory effects – is dynamic and not always clearly translatable between animals and humans. The current review addresses these issues and provides basic methods and considerations for the use of HCs in animal models of neurobehavior to help advance the field of behavioral neuroendocrinology and inform decisions regarding to women’s health.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101011\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091302222000346\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091302222000346","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

世界各地数以百万计的妇女服用激素避孕药,改变卵巢激素周期,导致激素避孕药使用者的神经行为发生变化。人类流行病学和实验数据表明,其中一些影响的结果往往相互矛盾或不可重复,这反映了考虑HC使用不同成分、给药途径或时间过程的研究的缺乏。非人类动物研究可以模拟这些影响,并有助于阐明不同hc调节神经行为结果的潜在机制。尽管如此,使用hc的动物模型尚未建立。这可能是因为hc的药理学特征——包括代谢、受体结合亲和力和神经调节作用——是动态的,在动物和人类之间并不总是清楚地可翻译。目前的综述解决了这些问题,并提供了在神经行为动物模型中使用hc的基本方法和注意事项,以帮助推动行为神经内分泌学领域的发展,并为有关妇女健康的决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methods and considerations for the use of hormonal contraceptives in rat models of neurobehavior

Hormonal contraceptives (HCs), prescribed to millions of women around the world, alter the ovarian hormonal cycle resulting in neurobehavioral changes in HC users. Human epidemiological and experimental data has characterized some of these effects with oftentimes conflicting or irreproducible results, reflecting a dearth of research considering different compositions, routes of administration, or time-courses of HC use. Non-human animal research can model these effects and help elucidate the underlying mechanisms by which different HCs modulate neurobehavioral outcomes. Still, animal models using HCs are not well-established. This may be because the pharmacological profile of HCs – including the metabolism, receptor binding affinity, and neuromodulatory effects – is dynamic and not always clearly translatable between animals and humans. The current review addresses these issues and provides basic methods and considerations for the use of HCs in animal models of neurobehavior to help advance the field of behavioral neuroendocrinology and inform decisions regarding to women’s health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
6.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology (FIN) publishes a wide range of informative articles including comprehensive reviews, systematic reviews, opinion pieces, and meta-analyses. While the majority of reviews are invited, we also embrace unsolicited reviews and meta-analyses, as well as proposals for thematic special issues, provided they meet our rigorous quality standards. In addition, we encourage authors to submit commentaries that concisely present fresh ideas or offer further analysis to delve deeper into the implications of an article published in our journal.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling sex differences in maternal and paternal care impacts on social behaviors and neurobiological responses to early-life adversity. Insulin-like growth factor-1 and cognitive health: Exploring cellular, preclinical, and clinical dimensions Progestagens and progesterone receptor modulation: Effects on the brain, mood, stress, and cognition in females Editorial Board Effect of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors in animal models of Parkinson’s disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1