Chandrika J Piyathilake, Constance B Robinson, Phillip Cornwell
{"title":"红细胞叶酸分析的实用方法。","authors":"Chandrika J Piyathilake, Constance B Robinson, Phillip Cornwell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The measurement of folate in red blood cells (RBCs) is preferred since it reflects long-term folate status in the body compared to plasma/serum folate which may be influenced by recent dietary intake. The commonly accepted technique for RBC folate analysis involves preparation of a hemolysate using a fresh whole blood sample. Hematocrit and plasma folate concentrations are needed to calculate RBC folate values. Because of the need for immediate access to a laboratory where processing can be performed, it may not be practical to assess RBC folate status using this method in field-based epidemiological studies. It is however, feasible to isolate packed RBSs from a blood sample under these conditions. The purpose of this study is to validate RBC folate analysis using packed red cells by comparing the RBC folate values obtained by hemolysate method (routine assay) with those obtained by using packed RBCs (new assay) in the same individuals (n = 50) using the folate microbiological assay. The correlation between plasma folate and the routine RBC folate assay (r = 0.58, p = 0.001) and the correlation between plasma folate and the new RBC folate assay was statistically significant (r = 0.55, p = 0.001). The correlation between RBC folate by the routine assay and new assay was also statistically significant (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). We conclude that measurement of folate in packed RBC is a practical approach in assessing long-term folate status in field-based and or larger scale epidemiological studies where an immediate access to a laboratory is unavailable for necessary sample processing for the routine RBC folate assay.</p>","PeriodicalId":7781,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry Insights","volume":"2 ","pages":"107-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2716806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A practical approach to red blood cell folate analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chandrika J Piyathilake, Constance B Robinson, Phillip Cornwell\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The measurement of folate in red blood cells (RBCs) is preferred since it reflects long-term folate status in the body compared to plasma/serum folate which may be influenced by recent dietary intake. The commonly accepted technique for RBC folate analysis involves preparation of a hemolysate using a fresh whole blood sample. Hematocrit and plasma folate concentrations are needed to calculate RBC folate values. Because of the need for immediate access to a laboratory where processing can be performed, it may not be practical to assess RBC folate status using this method in field-based epidemiological studies. It is however, feasible to isolate packed RBSs from a blood sample under these conditions. The purpose of this study is to validate RBC folate analysis using packed red cells by comparing the RBC folate values obtained by hemolysate method (routine assay) with those obtained by using packed RBCs (new assay) in the same individuals (n = 50) using the folate microbiological assay. The correlation between plasma folate and the routine RBC folate assay (r = 0.58, p = 0.001) and the correlation between plasma folate and the new RBC folate assay was statistically significant (r = 0.55, p = 0.001). The correlation between RBC folate by the routine assay and new assay was also statistically significant (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). We conclude that measurement of folate in packed RBC is a practical approach in assessing long-term folate status in field-based and or larger scale epidemiological studies where an immediate access to a laboratory is unavailable for necessary sample processing for the routine RBC folate assay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical Chemistry Insights\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"107-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2716806/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical Chemistry Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
红细胞(rbc)中叶酸的测量是首选,因为它反映了体内叶酸的长期状态,而血浆/血清叶酸可能受近期饮食摄入的影响。一般接受的RBC叶酸分析技术包括用新鲜的全血样本制备溶血液。计算红细胞叶酸值需要红细胞压积和血浆叶酸浓度。由于需要立即进入可以进行处理的实验室,因此在基于现场的流行病学研究中使用这种方法评估RBC叶酸状态可能不实用。然而,在这些条件下,从血液样本中分离包装红细胞是可行的。本研究的目的是通过比较在同一个体(n = 50)中使用叶酸微生物测定的溶血法(常规测定)获得的RBC叶酸值与使用填充红细胞(新测定)获得的RBC叶酸值,来验证使用填充红细胞分析的RBC叶酸值。血浆叶酸与常规红细胞叶酸测定之间的相关性(r = 0.58, p = 0.001)以及血浆叶酸与新红细胞叶酸测定之间的相关性具有统计学意义(r = 0.55, p = 0.001)。常规检测与新检测的红细胞叶酸水平也有统计学意义(r = 0.78, p < 0.001)。我们的结论是,在现场和/或更大规模的流行病学研究中,在无法立即进入实验室进行常规红细胞叶酸测定所需的样品处理的情况下,测量包装红细胞中的叶酸是评估长期叶酸状态的一种实用方法。
A practical approach to red blood cell folate analysis.
The measurement of folate in red blood cells (RBCs) is preferred since it reflects long-term folate status in the body compared to plasma/serum folate which may be influenced by recent dietary intake. The commonly accepted technique for RBC folate analysis involves preparation of a hemolysate using a fresh whole blood sample. Hematocrit and plasma folate concentrations are needed to calculate RBC folate values. Because of the need for immediate access to a laboratory where processing can be performed, it may not be practical to assess RBC folate status using this method in field-based epidemiological studies. It is however, feasible to isolate packed RBSs from a blood sample under these conditions. The purpose of this study is to validate RBC folate analysis using packed red cells by comparing the RBC folate values obtained by hemolysate method (routine assay) with those obtained by using packed RBCs (new assay) in the same individuals (n = 50) using the folate microbiological assay. The correlation between plasma folate and the routine RBC folate assay (r = 0.58, p = 0.001) and the correlation between plasma folate and the new RBC folate assay was statistically significant (r = 0.55, p = 0.001). The correlation between RBC folate by the routine assay and new assay was also statistically significant (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). We conclude that measurement of folate in packed RBC is a practical approach in assessing long-term folate status in field-based and or larger scale epidemiological studies where an immediate access to a laboratory is unavailable for necessary sample processing for the routine RBC folate assay.