共享睡眠:孩子头1000天的近端父母睡眠。

IF 0.3 Q4 Medicine Recherche en Soins Infirmiers Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.3917/rsi.145.0079
Sébastien Riquet, Manon Roussel, Marine Vigie, Carole Zakarian, Pascale Hassler
{"title":"共享睡眠:孩子头1000天的近端父母睡眠。","authors":"Sébastien Riquet,&nbsp;Manon Roussel,&nbsp;Marine Vigie,&nbsp;Carole Zakarian,&nbsp;Pascale Hassler","doi":"10.3917/rsi.145.0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction : Sleeping with your infant (known as co-sleeping) is a proximal parenting practice. In some societies, 80 percent of children sleep with their parents. In France, a culture of sleeping separately has emerged, and the practice of co-sleeping has been associated with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). International recommendations tend to advise against co-sleeping and to devalue it as a practice.Material and methods : Two focus groups with co-sleepers (n=6) complemented by ten in-depth interviews were organized to identify the motivations and organization that mothers and their partners have when it comes to practicing co-sleeping with their children. A content analysis of what was said in the interviews by individuals and couples enabled us to find out more about the needs that co-sleeping responds to, as well as parents' co-sleeping practices.Results : Co-sleeping, made taboo by SIDS, responds to emotional and practical factors. The couple's life does not seem to be negatively impacted by it. The positive relationship it allows parents to have with their children is valued. Recommendations may often describe this way of sleeping as \"unsafe,\" but co-sleepers support this parenting practice, along with breastfeeding.Conclusion : The results highlight the health education importance for co-sleepers. Being educated about co-sleeping will ensure that their practice is safe and will mean that they do not isolate themselves socially to hide it because they only have partial knowledge of the SIDS safety measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":44071,"journal":{"name":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Le sommeil partagé : parental proximal pour l’enfant dans ses 1 000 premiers jours.\",\"authors\":\"Sébastien Riquet,&nbsp;Manon Roussel,&nbsp;Marine Vigie,&nbsp;Carole Zakarian,&nbsp;Pascale Hassler\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/rsi.145.0079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction : Sleeping with your infant (known as co-sleeping) is a proximal parenting practice. In some societies, 80 percent of children sleep with their parents. In France, a culture of sleeping separately has emerged, and the practice of co-sleeping has been associated with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). International recommendations tend to advise against co-sleeping and to devalue it as a practice.Material and methods : Two focus groups with co-sleepers (n=6) complemented by ten in-depth interviews were organized to identify the motivations and organization that mothers and their partners have when it comes to practicing co-sleeping with their children. A content analysis of what was said in the interviews by individuals and couples enabled us to find out more about the needs that co-sleeping responds to, as well as parents' co-sleeping practices.Results : Co-sleeping, made taboo by SIDS, responds to emotional and practical factors. The couple's life does not seem to be negatively impacted by it. The positive relationship it allows parents to have with their children is valued. Recommendations may often describe this way of sleeping as \\\"unsafe,\\\" but co-sleepers support this parenting practice, along with breastfeeding.Conclusion : The results highlight the health education importance for co-sleepers. Being educated about co-sleeping will ensure that their practice is safe and will mean that they do not isolate themselves socially to hide it because they only have partial knowledge of the SIDS safety measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.145.0079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.145.0079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

简介:和你的宝宝一起睡(被称为共睡)是一种近距离的育儿实践。在一些社会中,80%的孩子和父母一起睡觉。在法国,一种分睡的文化已经出现,而同睡的做法与婴儿猝死综合症(SIDS)有关。国际上的建议倾向于反对同睡,并贬低这种做法的价值。材料和方法:组织了两个焦点小组(n=6),辅以10次深度访谈,以确定母亲及其伴侣在练习与孩子共睡时的动机和组织。对个人和夫妻在访谈中所说的内容进行分析,使我们能够更多地了解共同睡眠所回应的需求,以及父母共同睡眠的做法。结果:同睡是小岛屿发展中国家的禁忌,对情绪和现实因素有反应。这对夫妇的生活似乎并没有受到负面影响。它使父母与孩子之间的积极关系受到重视。建议通常将这种睡眠方式描述为“不安全”,但同睡者支持这种育儿做法,以及母乳喂养。结论:该结果突出了对共睡者进行健康教育的重要性。接受有关同睡的教育将确保他们的做法是安全的,并意味着他们不会因为对小岛屿发展中国家的安全措施只有部分了解而在社交上孤立自己来隐藏这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Le sommeil partagé : parental proximal pour l’enfant dans ses 1 000 premiers jours.

Introduction : Sleeping with your infant (known as co-sleeping) is a proximal parenting practice. In some societies, 80 percent of children sleep with their parents. In France, a culture of sleeping separately has emerged, and the practice of co-sleeping has been associated with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). International recommendations tend to advise against co-sleeping and to devalue it as a practice.Material and methods : Two focus groups with co-sleepers (n=6) complemented by ten in-depth interviews were organized to identify the motivations and organization that mothers and their partners have when it comes to practicing co-sleeping with their children. A content analysis of what was said in the interviews by individuals and couples enabled us to find out more about the needs that co-sleeping responds to, as well as parents' co-sleeping practices.Results : Co-sleeping, made taboo by SIDS, responds to emotional and practical factors. The couple's life does not seem to be negatively impacted by it. The positive relationship it allows parents to have with their children is valued. Recommendations may often describe this way of sleeping as "unsafe," but co-sleepers support this parenting practice, along with breastfeeding.Conclusion : The results highlight the health education importance for co-sleepers. Being educated about co-sleeping will ensure that their practice is safe and will mean that they do not isolate themselves socially to hide it because they only have partial knowledge of the SIDS safety measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Supporting nursing students with dyslexia: The situation in France in 2022 and outlook For a better understanding of the profile of nurses working in France who hold or are working toward a Ph.D: A quantitative descriptive study “It’s possible”, reducing the coercion in care for adults living with neurodevelopmental disorders: A mixed-methods study For a better understanding of the relationship between caregivers and young adults living with a concomitant substance-related mental health and substance use disorder: An integrative review The value of preventing constipation in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis: An advanced practice nursing study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1