{"title":"肿瘤抗原125与癌胚抗原联合检测可提高卵巢癌的诊断率。","authors":"Sofie Sølvsten Sørensen, Berit Jul Mosgaard","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the ability of the tumour marker carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in combination with cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) to differentiate between malignant ovarian and malignant non-ovarian disease.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All patients attending the Department of Gynaecology, Herlev Hospital, who underwent an \"ovary lab investigation\" between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2008 were included. Among a total of 640 patients, 355 had a malignant diagnosis. Preoperative CEA and CA-125 serum levels and final malignant diagnosis after surgery were extracted from the medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the patients with CEA levels > 5 ng/ml, 68% had non-ovarian malignancies. This test identified 39% of the non-ovarian cancers correctly. In patients with a CA-125/CEA ratio > 25, an ovarian cancer was found in 82%. The CA-125/CEA test identified 63% of the non-ovarian cancers correctly. The specificity increased to around 85% when the cut-off value of the CA-125/CEA ratio was increased from 25 to 100.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with an undiagnosed tumour in the pelvis, the CA-125/CEA ratio may be used to preoperatively identify a substantial fraction of patients with non-ovarian malignancies. In the study population, the specificity rose to 85% when the cut-off value was increased from 25 to 100, which highlights the usefulness of a higher cut-off level.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>not relevant.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11019,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical bulletin","volume":"58 11","pages":"A4331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination of cancer antigen 125 and carcinoembryonic antigen can improve ovarian cancer diagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Sofie Sølvsten Sørensen, Berit Jul Mosgaard\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the ability of the tumour marker carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in combination with cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) to differentiate between malignant ovarian and malignant non-ovarian disease.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All patients attending the Department of Gynaecology, Herlev Hospital, who underwent an \\\"ovary lab investigation\\\" between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2008 were included. Among a total of 640 patients, 355 had a malignant diagnosis. Preoperative CEA and CA-125 serum levels and final malignant diagnosis after surgery were extracted from the medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the patients with CEA levels > 5 ng/ml, 68% had non-ovarian malignancies. This test identified 39% of the non-ovarian cancers correctly. In patients with a CA-125/CEA ratio > 25, an ovarian cancer was found in 82%. The CA-125/CEA test identified 63% of the non-ovarian cancers correctly. The specificity increased to around 85% when the cut-off value of the CA-125/CEA ratio was increased from 25 to 100.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with an undiagnosed tumour in the pelvis, the CA-125/CEA ratio may be used to preoperatively identify a substantial fraction of patients with non-ovarian malignancies. In the study population, the specificity rose to 85% when the cut-off value was increased from 25 to 100, which highlights the usefulness of a higher cut-off level.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>not relevant.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>not relevant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Danish medical bulletin\",\"volume\":\"58 11\",\"pages\":\"A4331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Danish medical bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combination of cancer antigen 125 and carcinoembryonic antigen can improve ovarian cancer diagnosis.
Introduction: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the ability of the tumour marker carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in combination with cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) to differentiate between malignant ovarian and malignant non-ovarian disease.
Material and methods: All patients attending the Department of Gynaecology, Herlev Hospital, who underwent an "ovary lab investigation" between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2008 were included. Among a total of 640 patients, 355 had a malignant diagnosis. Preoperative CEA and CA-125 serum levels and final malignant diagnosis after surgery were extracted from the medical records.
Results: Among the patients with CEA levels > 5 ng/ml, 68% had non-ovarian malignancies. This test identified 39% of the non-ovarian cancers correctly. In patients with a CA-125/CEA ratio > 25, an ovarian cancer was found in 82%. The CA-125/CEA test identified 63% of the non-ovarian cancers correctly. The specificity increased to around 85% when the cut-off value of the CA-125/CEA ratio was increased from 25 to 100.
Conclusion: In patients with an undiagnosed tumour in the pelvis, the CA-125/CEA ratio may be used to preoperatively identify a substantial fraction of patients with non-ovarian malignancies. In the study population, the specificity rose to 85% when the cut-off value was increased from 25 to 100, which highlights the usefulness of a higher cut-off level.