经颅直流电刺激结合多学科康复方案治疗纤维肌痛的疗效。

Q4 Medicine Open Rheumatology Journal Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-10-18 DOI:10.2174/1874312901105010045
Marcelo Riberto, Fabio Marcon Alfieri, Kátia Monteiro de Benedetto Pacheco, Valeria Dini Leite, Harumi Nemoto Kaihami, Felipe Fregni, Linamara Rizzo Battistella
{"title":"经颅直流电刺激结合多学科康复方案治疗纤维肌痛的疗效。","authors":"Marcelo Riberto,&nbsp;Fabio Marcon Alfieri,&nbsp;Kátia Monteiro de Benedetto Pacheco,&nbsp;Valeria Dini Leite,&nbsp;Harumi Nemoto Kaihami,&nbsp;Felipe Fregni,&nbsp;Linamara Rizzo Battistella","doi":"10.2174/1874312901105010045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Pain control in fibromyalgia patients is limited no matter the therapeutic regimens used. Recent data have shown that daily sessions of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) are associated with reduction of pain perception.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to test whether active tDCS, as compared with sham tDCS, combined with multidisciplinary rehabilitation is associated with significant clinical gains in fibromyalgia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>23 patients were randomized to receive weekly sessions of multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach combined with sham or anodal tDCS of M1. Patients were evaluated for pain with VAS and for quality of life with SF-36, fibromyalgia pain questionnaire and health assessment questionnaire by a blinded rater before and after the 4 month period of rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients tolerated tDCS treatment well, without adverse effects. Patients who received active treatment had a significantly greater reduction of SF-36 pain domain scores (F((2,21))=6.57; p=0.006) and a tendency of higher improvement in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) scores after (p=0.056) as compared with sham tDCS/standard treatment, but no differences were observed in the other domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although active tDCS was associated with superior results in one domain (SF-36 pain domain), the lack of significance in the other domains does not fully support this strategy (weekly tDCS) combined with a multidisciplinary approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":39124,"journal":{"name":"Open Rheumatology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874312901105010045","citationCount":"72","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation coupled with a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for the treatment of fibromyalgia.\",\"authors\":\"Marcelo Riberto,&nbsp;Fabio Marcon Alfieri,&nbsp;Kátia Monteiro de Benedetto Pacheco,&nbsp;Valeria Dini Leite,&nbsp;Harumi Nemoto Kaihami,&nbsp;Felipe Fregni,&nbsp;Linamara Rizzo Battistella\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874312901105010045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Pain control in fibromyalgia patients is limited no matter the therapeutic regimens used. Recent data have shown that daily sessions of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) are associated with reduction of pain perception.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to test whether active tDCS, as compared with sham tDCS, combined with multidisciplinary rehabilitation is associated with significant clinical gains in fibromyalgia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>23 patients were randomized to receive weekly sessions of multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach combined with sham or anodal tDCS of M1. Patients were evaluated for pain with VAS and for quality of life with SF-36, fibromyalgia pain questionnaire and health assessment questionnaire by a blinded rater before and after the 4 month period of rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients tolerated tDCS treatment well, without adverse effects. Patients who received active treatment had a significantly greater reduction of SF-36 pain domain scores (F((2,21))=6.57; p=0.006) and a tendency of higher improvement in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) scores after (p=0.056) as compared with sham tDCS/standard treatment, but no differences were observed in the other domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although active tDCS was associated with superior results in one domain (SF-36 pain domain), the lack of significance in the other domains does not fully support this strategy (weekly tDCS) combined with a multidisciplinary approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Rheumatology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"45-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874312901105010045\",\"citationCount\":\"72\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Rheumatology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874312901105010045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/10/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Rheumatology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874312901105010045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

摘要

未标明:纤维肌痛患者的疼痛控制是有限的,无论使用何种治疗方案。最近的数据显示,纤维肌痛(FM)患者每日在初级运动皮质(M1)上进行阳极经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)与疼痛感知的减少有关。目的:我们旨在测试与假tDCS相比,活动tDCS结合多学科康复是否与纤维肌痛的显著临床获益相关。设计:这是一项随机、双盲对照试验。受试者:23例患者随机接受每周一次的多学科康复治疗,并结合M1的假或淋巴结tDCS。采用盲法评估患者康复前后4个月的VAS疼痛、SF-36生活质量、纤维肌痛疼痛问卷和健康评估问卷。结果:患者对tDCS治疗耐受性良好,无不良反应。接受积极治疗的患者SF-36疼痛域评分显著降低(F(2,21))=6.57;p=0.006),与假tDCS/标准治疗相比,纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)评分有更高的改善趋势(p=0.056),但在其他领域无差异。结论:尽管主动tDCS与一个领域(SF-36疼痛领域)的优越结果相关,但在其他领域缺乏意义并不完全支持该策略(每周tDCS)与多学科方法相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation coupled with a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for the treatment of fibromyalgia.

Unlabelled: Pain control in fibromyalgia patients is limited no matter the therapeutic regimens used. Recent data have shown that daily sessions of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) are associated with reduction of pain perception.

Objective: We aimed to test whether active tDCS, as compared with sham tDCS, combined with multidisciplinary rehabilitation is associated with significant clinical gains in fibromyalgia.

Design: This was a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial.

Subjects: 23 patients were randomized to receive weekly sessions of multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach combined with sham or anodal tDCS of M1. Patients were evaluated for pain with VAS and for quality of life with SF-36, fibromyalgia pain questionnaire and health assessment questionnaire by a blinded rater before and after the 4 month period of rehabilitation.

Results: Patients tolerated tDCS treatment well, without adverse effects. Patients who received active treatment had a significantly greater reduction of SF-36 pain domain scores (F((2,21))=6.57; p=0.006) and a tendency of higher improvement in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) scores after (p=0.056) as compared with sham tDCS/standard treatment, but no differences were observed in the other domains.

Conclusions: Although active tDCS was associated with superior results in one domain (SF-36 pain domain), the lack of significance in the other domains does not fully support this strategy (weekly tDCS) combined with a multidisciplinary approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Rheumatology Journal
Open Rheumatology Journal Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: ENTHAM Open publishes a number of peer-reviewed, open access journals. These free-to-view online journals cover all major disciplines of science, medicine, technology and social sciences. BENTHAM Open provides researchers a platform to rapidly publish their research in a good-quality peer-reviewed journal. All peer-reviewed accepted submissions meeting high research and ethical standards are published with free access to all.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Features, Socio-cultural Characteristics, Sleep Patterns, and Depression in Fibromyalgia Patients from India: A Cross-Sectional Study The Diagnostic Significance of Serum Sclerostin in Early Detection of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Syrian Patients Clinical Characteristics of Systemic Sclerosis-associated Myopathy Patients Comparing Different Subgroups of Inflammatory Myopathies Association of Interleukin-6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Gene Polymorphisms with Gnetic Susceptibility of Psoriatic Arthritis in Kuwaiti Arab Patients The Etiopathogenesis and Genetic Factors in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: A Review Article
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1