团结指导方针和社会立场。奥地利对福利国家和难民的习惯性阶级态度团结取向和社会地位。奥地利对福利国家和难民的通常阶级态度]。

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-14 DOI:10.1007/s11609-022-00473-x
Carina Altreiter, Jörg Flecker, Ulrike Papouschek
{"title":"团结指导方针和社会立场。奥地利对福利国家和难民的习惯性阶级态度团结取向和社会地位。奥地利对福利国家和难民的通常阶级态度]。","authors":"Carina Altreiter,&nbsp;Jörg Flecker,&nbsp;Ulrike Papouschek","doi":"10.1007/s11609-022-00473-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The article examines the importance of social class in shaping solidarity orientations in Austria, especially with regard to welfare state arrangements and solidarity with refugees. It builds on 48 interviews conducted between 2016 and 2019. Distinguishing multiple dimensions of solidarity, the paper builds a typology of seven solidarity configurations, which are then systematically related to the class position of interviewees articulating them. In that context, not only objective class positions, but also latent mechanisms of habitus formation are taken into account. In so doing, the paper indicates how solidarity configurations of both privileged and non-privileged interviewees are shaped, but not determined by class. This casts new light on meaningful differences in the scope, conditions and underlying normative principles of distinct solidarity configurations. Class is key to understanding how attitudes towards the community of welfare solidarity are tied to specific preferences as to who should be included in and excluded from that community.</p>","PeriodicalId":51909,"journal":{"name":"Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie","volume":"32 2","pages":"317-348"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194342/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Solidarity orientations and social positions. Class habitual attitudes towards the welfare state and refugees in AustriaOrientations solidaires et positions sociales. Attitudes habituelles de classe envers l'État-providence et les réfugiés en Autriche].\",\"authors\":\"Carina Altreiter,&nbsp;Jörg Flecker,&nbsp;Ulrike Papouschek\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11609-022-00473-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The article examines the importance of social class in shaping solidarity orientations in Austria, especially with regard to welfare state arrangements and solidarity with refugees. It builds on 48 interviews conducted between 2016 and 2019. Distinguishing multiple dimensions of solidarity, the paper builds a typology of seven solidarity configurations, which are then systematically related to the class position of interviewees articulating them. In that context, not only objective class positions, but also latent mechanisms of habitus formation are taken into account. In so doing, the paper indicates how solidarity configurations of both privileged and non-privileged interviewees are shaped, but not determined by class. This casts new light on meaningful differences in the scope, conditions and underlying normative principles of distinct solidarity configurations. Class is key to understanding how attitudes towards the community of welfare solidarity are tied to specific preferences as to who should be included in and excluded from that community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"317-348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194342/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-022-00473-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-022-00473-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文考察了社会阶层在奥地利形成团结取向方面的重要性,特别是在福利国家安排和与难民的团结方面。该报告基于2016年至2019年期间进行的48次采访。区分团结的多个维度,本文建立了七个团结配置的类型学,然后系统地与受访者阐明他们的阶级立场相关。在这种情况下,不仅要考虑客观的阶级地位,还要考虑习惯形成的潜在机制。通过这样做,本文表明了特权和非特权受访者的团结配置是如何形成的,但不是由阶级决定的。这为不同团结形态的范围、条件和基本规范原则的有意义差异提供了新的视角。阶级是理解对福利团结共同体的态度如何与谁应该被纳入和被排除在该共同体之外的具体偏好联系在一起的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Solidarity orientations and social positions. Class habitual attitudes towards the welfare state and refugees in AustriaOrientations solidaires et positions sociales. Attitudes habituelles de classe envers l'État-providence et les réfugiés en Autriche].

The article examines the importance of social class in shaping solidarity orientations in Austria, especially with regard to welfare state arrangements and solidarity with refugees. It builds on 48 interviews conducted between 2016 and 2019. Distinguishing multiple dimensions of solidarity, the paper builds a typology of seven solidarity configurations, which are then systematically related to the class position of interviewees articulating them. In that context, not only objective class positions, but also latent mechanisms of habitus formation are taken into account. In so doing, the paper indicates how solidarity configurations of both privileged and non-privileged interviewees are shaped, but not determined by class. This casts new light on meaningful differences in the scope, conditions and underlying normative principles of distinct solidarity configurations. Class is key to understanding how attitudes towards the community of welfare solidarity are tied to specific preferences as to who should be included in and excluded from that community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
27.30%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Berliner Journal für Soziologie (“Berlin Journal of Sociology”), edited by the Institute of Sociology at the Friedrich Schiller University Jena and the Institute of Social Sciences at the Humboldt University Berlin, publishes double-blind peer-reviewed articles on classical and modern theoretical approaches, essays on current problem areas of sociological discourse, and research notes presenting new empirical findings. Focussed issues and review essays reflect innovative developments within the German and international social sciences and inform about the state of research in central areas of sociology. The journal was founded in 1991 on the initiative of the East German Society of Sociology. It views itself as a general sociological journal that publishes contributions from all research and subject areas of sociology. From the very beginning, the programmatic aim has been to provide a forum for the discussion and further development of sociological problems in the light of contemporary theoretical and social developments. Two major topics have been at the journal''s core and will continue to shape its contents in the future: Transformation and Culture. The journal deals with the socio-ecological upheaval that modern societies are undergoing. Globalisation, changes in working society and lifestyles, digitalisation, social conflicts up to new wars, new challenges for democracy, populism and nationalism as well as gender relations are important topics of a renewed Great Transformation. Cultural sociology and comparative cultural research deal with developments in these fields in a special way. The BJS therefore continues to devote its attention to such perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Digitale Scorings als Statusmarker. Eine ungleichheitssoziologische Annäherung Immer Ärger mit dem Kategorisieren: Eine heikle Debatte im Berliner Journal für Soziologie Ein Plädoyer für eine genetische Soziologie ethnorassischer Herrschaft. Eine Antwort auf meine deutschen Kritikerinnen „Eigentlich war es immer sonnenklar.“ Zur Invisibilisierung von formaler Organisation in Bewertungspraktiken Ungleicher Besitz. Perspektiven einer klassensoziologischen Untersuchung von Vermögen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1