高保真临床模拟后反思性述职促进新护士临床判断的中试研究。

Dynamics (Pembroke, Ont.) Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Patrick Lavoie, Jacinthe Pepin, Louise Boyer
{"title":"高保真临床模拟后反思性述职促进新护士临床判断的中试研究。","authors":"Patrick Lavoie,&nbsp;Jacinthe Pepin,&nbsp;Louise Boyer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Novice nurses are increasingly beginning their career paths in critical care areas, where they are expected to care for patients whose lives are potentially threatened. They are unable to benefit from years of experience to facilitate their clinical decisions. Reflection after simulation could possibly improve nurses' clinical judgment in complex situations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An educational project was conducted to pilot-test a teaching intervention, which combined reflective debriefing with a simulated critical care experience.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five nurses beginning in an intensive care unit participated in the pilot test. Their perception of their learning and satisfaction with the reflective debriefing and the simulation were collected using open-ended questionnaires. A clinical nurse educator, a faculty member and the first author participated in a group discussion to review the time plan and the affective components of the teaching intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported that the reflective debriefing helped them understand their cognitive processes during the simulation and contributed to clinical judgment development and to their care prioritization and assessment capacities. Observers reported the time plan was adequate and that attention to participants' negative feelings was necessary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this pilot test provide preliminary information that reflective debriefing may be a safe and potentially effective way for novice critical care nurses to learn from a clinical experience and enhance clinical judgment.</p>","PeriodicalId":80276,"journal":{"name":"Dynamics (Pembroke, Ont.)","volume":"24 4","pages":"36-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflective debriefing to promote novice nurses' clinical judgment after high-fidelity clinical simulation: a pilot test.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Lavoie,&nbsp;Jacinthe Pepin,&nbsp;Louise Boyer\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Novice nurses are increasingly beginning their career paths in critical care areas, where they are expected to care for patients whose lives are potentially threatened. They are unable to benefit from years of experience to facilitate their clinical decisions. Reflection after simulation could possibly improve nurses' clinical judgment in complex situations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An educational project was conducted to pilot-test a teaching intervention, which combined reflective debriefing with a simulated critical care experience.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five nurses beginning in an intensive care unit participated in the pilot test. Their perception of their learning and satisfaction with the reflective debriefing and the simulation were collected using open-ended questionnaires. A clinical nurse educator, a faculty member and the first author participated in a group discussion to review the time plan and the affective components of the teaching intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported that the reflective debriefing helped them understand their cognitive processes during the simulation and contributed to clinical judgment development and to their care prioritization and assessment capacities. Observers reported the time plan was adequate and that attention to participants' negative feelings was necessary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this pilot test provide preliminary information that reflective debriefing may be a safe and potentially effective way for novice critical care nurses to learn from a clinical experience and enhance clinical judgment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dynamics (Pembroke, Ont.)\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"36-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dynamics (Pembroke, Ont.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamics (Pembroke, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的新手护士开始他们在重症监护领域的职业道路,在那里他们被期望照顾那些生命受到潜在威胁的病人。他们无法从多年的经验中受益,以促进他们的临床决策。模拟后反思有可能提高护士在复杂情况下的临床判断能力。设计:进行了一个教育项目,对教学干预进行了试点测试,该干预将反思性汇报与模拟重症监护经验相结合。方法:5名在重症监护室工作的护士参与了试点测试。他们对学习的感知和对反思性汇报和模拟的满意度是通过开放式问卷收集的。一名临床护理教育工作者、一名教师和第一作者参与了小组讨论,以回顾教学干预的时间计划和情感成分。结果:参与者报告说,反思性述情有助于他们了解他们在模拟过程中的认知过程,有助于临床判断的发展和他们的护理优先级和评估能力。观察者报告说,时间计划是足够的,对参与者负面情绪的关注是必要的。结论:本中试结果提供了初步信息,反思性述诉可能是一种安全有效的方法,可以帮助重症监护新手护士从临床经验中学习,提高临床判断能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reflective debriefing to promote novice nurses' clinical judgment after high-fidelity clinical simulation: a pilot test.

Background: Novice nurses are increasingly beginning their career paths in critical care areas, where they are expected to care for patients whose lives are potentially threatened. They are unable to benefit from years of experience to facilitate their clinical decisions. Reflection after simulation could possibly improve nurses' clinical judgment in complex situations.

Design: An educational project was conducted to pilot-test a teaching intervention, which combined reflective debriefing with a simulated critical care experience.

Method: Five nurses beginning in an intensive care unit participated in the pilot test. Their perception of their learning and satisfaction with the reflective debriefing and the simulation were collected using open-ended questionnaires. A clinical nurse educator, a faculty member and the first author participated in a group discussion to review the time plan and the affective components of the teaching intervention.

Results: Participants reported that the reflective debriefing helped them understand their cognitive processes during the simulation and contributed to clinical judgment development and to their care prioritization and assessment capacities. Observers reported the time plan was adequate and that attention to participants' negative feelings was necessary.

Conclusion: The results of this pilot test provide preliminary information that reflective debriefing may be a safe and potentially effective way for novice critical care nurses to learn from a clinical experience and enhance clinical judgment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Transition from Stability to Chaos through Random Matrices Robust Global Trends during Pandemics: Analysing the Interplay of Biological and Social Processes Unveiling Dynamical Symmetries in 2D Chaotic Iterative Maps with Ordinal-Patterns-Based Complexity Quantifiers Thermal Hydraulics Simulation of a Water Spray System for a Cooling Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) Regenerator Investigation of Jamming Phenomenon in a Direct Reduction Furnace Pellet Feed System Using the Discrete Element Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1