是什么让一个人成为巨魔?网络挑衅的心理:系统文献综述]。

Q4 Medicine Psychiatria Hungarica Pub Date : 2022-01-01
Edit Vass, Gábor Csukly, Lajos Simon
{"title":"是什么让一个人成为巨魔?网络挑衅的心理:系统文献综述]。","authors":"Edit Vass,&nbsp;Gábor Csukly,&nbsp;Lajos Simon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Wide Web along with online social media has significantly changed the dynamics of communication. Information is easier and faster to access, but at the same time the relevance of the content often remains questionable, often confronting users with half-truths and untruths. Information consumption patterns have also changed a lot, allowing more room for the emergence of deviant, provocative behaviors through anonymity. The latter form of behavior can have different effects depending on its intensity and content, including, the polarization of opinions or the negative influence on users 'psychological wellbeing'. In our current article the literature on the pheno menon known as trolling in Internet slang was reviewed in order to better understand its nature and its possible effects.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Our systematic literature review was based on a computer search of the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases framed by the PRISMA guideline. The following keywords were used: \"Internet\" OR \"Facebook\" OR \"Twitter\" OR \"Instagram\" AND \"troll\" OR \"trolling\".</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Based on the mentioned methon, a total number of 4575 articles were identified. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria 24 articles were included in the final sample. The results and experiences of the published papers were presented according to the subgroups formed on the basis of the purpose of the studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Included articles focused primarily on understanding the motivation of trolling behavior and their impact on online behavior. However, the possible impact of trolls on individuals was left out of focus, leaving many open questions behind.</p>","PeriodicalId":35063,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria Hungarica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[What makes someone a troll? The psychology of trolling: Systematic literature review].\",\"authors\":\"Edit Vass,&nbsp;Gábor Csukly,&nbsp;Lajos Simon\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Wide Web along with online social media has significantly changed the dynamics of communication. Information is easier and faster to access, but at the same time the relevance of the content often remains questionable, often confronting users with half-truths and untruths. Information consumption patterns have also changed a lot, allowing more room for the emergence of deviant, provocative behaviors through anonymity. The latter form of behavior can have different effects depending on its intensity and content, including, the polarization of opinions or the negative influence on users 'psychological wellbeing'. In our current article the literature on the pheno menon known as trolling in Internet slang was reviewed in order to better understand its nature and its possible effects.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Our systematic literature review was based on a computer search of the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases framed by the PRISMA guideline. The following keywords were used: \\\"Internet\\\" OR \\\"Facebook\\\" OR \\\"Twitter\\\" OR \\\"Instagram\\\" AND \\\"troll\\\" OR \\\"trolling\\\".</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Based on the mentioned methon, a total number of 4575 articles were identified. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria 24 articles were included in the final sample. The results and experiences of the published papers were presented according to the subgroups formed on the basis of the purpose of the studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Included articles focused primarily on understanding the motivation of trolling behavior and their impact on online behavior. However, the possible impact of trolls on individuals was left out of focus, leaving many open questions behind.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatria Hungarica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatria Hungarica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:万维网和在线社交媒体极大地改变了交流的动态。信息更容易、更快捷地获取,但与此同时,内容的相关性往往仍然值得怀疑,用户经常面临半真半假的事实。信息消费模式也发生了很大的变化,通过匿名的方式为越轨、挑衅行为的出现提供了更大的空间。后一种形式的行为会根据其强度和内容产生不同的影响,包括意见的两极分化或对用户心理健康的负面影响。在我们当前的文章中,为了更好地了解网络俚语中被称为trolling的现象,我们回顾了有关这种现象的文献,以便更好地了解它的性质及其可能的影响。方法:我们系统的文献综述是基于计算机检索PubMed和ScienceDirect数据库,并以PRISMA指南为框架。使用了以下关键词:“Internet”或“Facebook”或“Twitter”或“Instagram”和“troll”或“trolling”。结果:根据上述方法,共鉴定出4575篇文献。根据纳入和排除标准,24篇文章被纳入最终样本。将已发表论文的成果和经验按研究目的组成的小组进行介绍。结论:纳入的文章主要集中在理解钓鱼行为的动机及其对在线行为的影响。然而,喷子对个人可能产生的影响并没有得到关注,留下了许多悬而未决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[What makes someone a troll? The psychology of trolling: Systematic literature review].

Background: The World Wide Web along with online social media has significantly changed the dynamics of communication. Information is easier and faster to access, but at the same time the relevance of the content often remains questionable, often confronting users with half-truths and untruths. Information consumption patterns have also changed a lot, allowing more room for the emergence of deviant, provocative behaviors through anonymity. The latter form of behavior can have different effects depending on its intensity and content, including, the polarization of opinions or the negative influence on users 'psychological wellbeing'. In our current article the literature on the pheno menon known as trolling in Internet slang was reviewed in order to better understand its nature and its possible effects.

Method: Our systematic literature review was based on a computer search of the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases framed by the PRISMA guideline. The following keywords were used: "Internet" OR "Facebook" OR "Twitter" OR "Instagram" AND "troll" OR "trolling".

Result: Based on the mentioned methon, a total number of 4575 articles were identified. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria 24 articles were included in the final sample. The results and experiences of the published papers were presented according to the subgroups formed on the basis of the purpose of the studies.

Conclusion: Included articles focused primarily on understanding the motivation of trolling behavior and their impact on online behavior. However, the possible impact of trolls on individuals was left out of focus, leaving many open questions behind.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatria Hungarica
Psychiatria Hungarica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Challenges and resolutions in mental health support for medical students. Mental Health Counseling Service at Semmelweis University]. [Csontvary, a Hungarian Painter, Art, Psychiatry. The Analysis according to Rennert]. [Depressed reality]. [Recent studies about the underlying cerebral mechanism of the fearfull arousals from slow wave sleep]. [The role of artificial intelligence in psychiatry].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1