临床催眠效果评估指南。

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-22 DOI:10.1080/00207144.2022.2049446
Zoltan Kekecs, Donald Moss, Gary Elkins, Giuseppe De Benedittis, Olafur S Palsson, Philip D Shenefelt, Devin B Terhune, Katalin Varga, Peter J Whorwell
{"title":"临床催眠效果评估指南。","authors":"Zoltan Kekecs,&nbsp;Donald Moss,&nbsp;Gary Elkins,&nbsp;Giuseppe De Benedittis,&nbsp;Olafur S Palsson,&nbsp;Philip D Shenefelt,&nbsp;Devin B Terhune,&nbsp;Katalin Varga,&nbsp;Peter J Whorwell","doi":"10.1080/00207144.2022.2049446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on the efficacy of hypnosis applications continues to grow, but there remain major gaps between the science and clinical practice. One challenge has been a lack of consensus on which applications of hypnosis are efficacious based on research evidence. In 2018, 6 major hypnosis organizations collaborated to form the Task Force for Establishing Efficacy Standards for Clinical Hypnosis. This paper describes a Guideline for the Assessment of Efficacy of Clinical Hypnosis Applications developed by the Task Force, which makes 10 specific recommendations. The guideline is intended to be a tool for those who want to assess the quality of existing evidence on the efficacy of clinical hypnosis for any particular indication. The paper also discusses methodological issues in the interpretation and implementation of these guidelines. Future papers will report on the other products of the Hypnosis Efficacy Task Force, such as best practice recommendations for outcomes research in hypnosis and an international survey of researchers and clinicians on current practice and attitudes about hypnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13896,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines for the Assessment of Efficacy of Clinical Hypnosis Applications.\",\"authors\":\"Zoltan Kekecs,&nbsp;Donald Moss,&nbsp;Gary Elkins,&nbsp;Giuseppe De Benedittis,&nbsp;Olafur S Palsson,&nbsp;Philip D Shenefelt,&nbsp;Devin B Terhune,&nbsp;Katalin Varga,&nbsp;Peter J Whorwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00207144.2022.2049446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research on the efficacy of hypnosis applications continues to grow, but there remain major gaps between the science and clinical practice. One challenge has been a lack of consensus on which applications of hypnosis are efficacious based on research evidence. In 2018, 6 major hypnosis organizations collaborated to form the Task Force for Establishing Efficacy Standards for Clinical Hypnosis. This paper describes a Guideline for the Assessment of Efficacy of Clinical Hypnosis Applications developed by the Task Force, which makes 10 specific recommendations. The guideline is intended to be a tool for those who want to assess the quality of existing evidence on the efficacy of clinical hypnosis for any particular indication. The paper also discusses methodological issues in the interpretation and implementation of these guidelines. Future papers will report on the other products of the Hypnosis Efficacy Task Force, such as best practice recommendations for outcomes research in hypnosis and an international survey of researchers and clinicians on current practice and attitudes about hypnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2022.2049446\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2022.2049446","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

对催眠应用效果的研究不断增长,但科学与临床实践之间仍存在重大差距。一个挑战是缺乏共识,催眠的应用是有效的基于研究证据。2018年,6大催眠机构联合成立“临床催眠疗效标准制定工作组”。本文介绍了由工作组制定的临床催眠应用疗效评估指南,其中提出了10项具体建议。该指南旨在为那些想要评估临床催眠对任何特定适应症疗效的现有证据质量的人提供工具。本文还讨论了在解释和实施这些准则时的方法问题。未来的论文将报道催眠功效工作组的其他产品,如催眠结果研究的最佳实践建议,以及研究人员和临床医生对当前催眠实践和态度的国际调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guidelines for the Assessment of Efficacy of Clinical Hypnosis Applications.

Research on the efficacy of hypnosis applications continues to grow, but there remain major gaps between the science and clinical practice. One challenge has been a lack of consensus on which applications of hypnosis are efficacious based on research evidence. In 2018, 6 major hypnosis organizations collaborated to form the Task Force for Establishing Efficacy Standards for Clinical Hypnosis. This paper describes a Guideline for the Assessment of Efficacy of Clinical Hypnosis Applications developed by the Task Force, which makes 10 specific recommendations. The guideline is intended to be a tool for those who want to assess the quality of existing evidence on the efficacy of clinical hypnosis for any particular indication. The paper also discusses methodological issues in the interpretation and implementation of these guidelines. Future papers will report on the other products of the Hypnosis Efficacy Task Force, such as best practice recommendations for outcomes research in hypnosis and an international survey of researchers and clinicians on current practice and attitudes about hypnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
29.40%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The IJCEH will keep you up to date on the latest clinical and research findings in the field, thanks to leading scholars from around the world examining such topics as: •Hypnotherapeutic Techniques •Pain and Anxiety Relief •Disociative Identity Disorder (Multiple Personality Disorder) •Altered States of Consciousness •Delayed Recall •Dissociation •Forensic Uses of Hypnosis •Hypnosis in Eyewitness Memory •Hypnotic Induction in Dentistry •Hypnotizability •Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder •Self-Hypnosis •Control of Smoking •Weight Management •Ego State Hypnotherapy •Theories of Hypnosis •Physiological & Psychological Bases of Hypnosis
期刊最新文献
A General Factor of Hypnotizability Revealed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS), Hypnosis, and Hypnotizability: Literature Review and Future Directions. A Multicomponent Cognitive-Behavioral Hypnotic Approach for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment: A Case Study. Power of a Few Vagrant Words: Effects of Direct and Indirect Suggestions for Self-Representation in Art-Based Online Interventions. Utilizing Involuntary Unfolding Phenomena as Catalyst for Adaptive Responsiveness and Reorganization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1