"你失去了一些好朋友辅助生活中的死亡与悲伤

IF 1.6 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-22 DOI:10.1080/15524256.2022.2050339
Evan Plys, Ronald Smith, Jennifer D Portz
{"title":"\"你失去了一些好朋友辅助生活中的死亡与悲伤","authors":"Evan Plys, Ronald Smith, Jennifer D Portz","doi":"10.1080/15524256.2022.2050339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate responses to death at multiple levels within the assisted living (AL) system and to characterize the psychosocial impact of death on surviving residents. This study used secondary thematic analysis of multiple data sources collected as part of a larger quantitative-focused study with 21 ALs. Data sources included: (a) community documents, e.g., newsletters; (b) descriptive and reflective observational field notes; and (c) memos and key statements from interviews with residents (<i>n</i> = 18). Three themes emerged from the data: administrative memorialization practices, resident perceptions of staff communication related to death, and resident psychosocial responses to death. Surviving residents reported using both adaptive and avoidant strategies to cope with psychological responses to death; noting that grief responses extended to the loss of the deceased resident's family, friends, and pets. Residents also perceived staff-resident communication and community memorialization practices as incongruent with a \"family-like\" social climate. Findings highlight the potential utility of a multi-level approach to improving psychosocial aspects of end-of-life care and grief management by targeting AL administration, workforce, and individuals. Social workers are well-positioned to lead these types of psychosocial interventions but must contend with staffing barriers limiting clinical roles in AL.</p>","PeriodicalId":45992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"160-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"You Lose Some Good Friends\\\": Death and Grief in Assisted Living.\",\"authors\":\"Evan Plys, Ronald Smith, Jennifer D Portz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15524256.2022.2050339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate responses to death at multiple levels within the assisted living (AL) system and to characterize the psychosocial impact of death on surviving residents. This study used secondary thematic analysis of multiple data sources collected as part of a larger quantitative-focused study with 21 ALs. Data sources included: (a) community documents, e.g., newsletters; (b) descriptive and reflective observational field notes; and (c) memos and key statements from interviews with residents (<i>n</i> = 18). Three themes emerged from the data: administrative memorialization practices, resident perceptions of staff communication related to death, and resident psychosocial responses to death. Surviving residents reported using both adaptive and avoidant strategies to cope with psychological responses to death; noting that grief responses extended to the loss of the deceased resident's family, friends, and pets. Residents also perceived staff-resident communication and community memorialization practices as incongruent with a \\\"family-like\\\" social climate. Findings highlight the potential utility of a multi-level approach to improving psychosocial aspects of end-of-life care and grief management by targeting AL administration, workforce, and individuals. Social workers are well-positioned to lead these types of psychosocial interventions but must contend with staffing barriers limiting clinical roles in AL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"160-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2022.2050339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2022.2050339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是调查生活辅助设施(AL)系统内多个层面对死亡的反应,并描述死亡对幸存居民的社会心理影响。本研究对收集到的多个数据源进行了二次主题分析,这些数据源是一项以 21 家辅助生活设施为对象的大型定量研究的一部分。数据来源包括(a) 社区文件,如通讯;(b) 描述性和反思性的实地观察笔记;以及 (c) 与居民(n = 18)访谈的备忘录和关键陈述。数据中出现了三个主题:行政追悼实践、居民对员工死亡沟通的看法以及居民对死亡的社会心理反应。幸存的住院患者报告说,他们使用了适应性和回避性两种策略来应对死亡带来的心理反应;他们指出,悲伤反应延伸到了失去已故住院患者的家人、朋友和宠物。居民还认为工作人员与居民之间的沟通和社区追悼会的做法与 "家庭式 "的社会氛围不一致。研究结果凸显了通过针对养老院管理部门、员工队伍和个人的多层次方法来改善临终关怀和悲伤管理的社会心理方面的潜在效用。社工完全有能力领导这些类型的社会心理干预,但必须与限制临终关怀临床角色的人员障碍作斗争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"You Lose Some Good Friends": Death and Grief in Assisted Living.

The purpose of this study was to investigate responses to death at multiple levels within the assisted living (AL) system and to characterize the psychosocial impact of death on surviving residents. This study used secondary thematic analysis of multiple data sources collected as part of a larger quantitative-focused study with 21 ALs. Data sources included: (a) community documents, e.g., newsletters; (b) descriptive and reflective observational field notes; and (c) memos and key statements from interviews with residents (n = 18). Three themes emerged from the data: administrative memorialization practices, resident perceptions of staff communication related to death, and resident psychosocial responses to death. Surviving residents reported using both adaptive and avoidant strategies to cope with psychological responses to death; noting that grief responses extended to the loss of the deceased resident's family, friends, and pets. Residents also perceived staff-resident communication and community memorialization practices as incongruent with a "family-like" social climate. Findings highlight the potential utility of a multi-level approach to improving psychosocial aspects of end-of-life care and grief management by targeting AL administration, workforce, and individuals. Social workers are well-positioned to lead these types of psychosocial interventions but must contend with staffing barriers limiting clinical roles in AL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, now affiliated with the Social Work in Hospice and Palliative Care Network, explores issues crucial to caring for terminally ill patients and their families. Academics and social work practitioners present current research, articles, and continuing features on the "state of the art" of social work practice, including interdisciplinary interventions, practice innovations, practice evaluations, end-of-life decision-making, grief and bereavement, and ethical and moral issues. The Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care combines theory and practice to facilitate an understanding of the multi-level issues surrounding care for those in pain and suffering from painful, debilitating, and/or terminal illness.
期刊最新文献
Chains. A Phenomenological Study of Clinical Stillbirth Management for Grieving Mothers. How Tangible is an Advance Care Planning Document in Reality? Still Ship at Sea. Disbelief, Distress, & Distrust: Trending Institution Related Emotional Distress During COVID-19.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1