Devea R De, Terri Shih, Denise Fixsen, Brindley Brooks, Jennifer L Hsiao, Vivian Y Shi
{"title":"化脓性汗腺炎的生物治疗:患者观点和障碍。","authors":"Devea R De, Terri Shih, Denise Fixsen, Brindley Brooks, Jennifer L Hsiao, Vivian Y Shi","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2022.2089336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory dermatosis for which the treatment paradigm is rapidly expanding. We aimed to identify HS patient perspectives and barriers on biologics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous survey was distributed between 10/2021 and 1/2022 through HS support groups. Data regarding demographics and perspectives on biologics were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 196 respondents, 92% were female (180/196) and 75% were white (147/196). 89.3% had Hurley stage 2/3 HS (102/195). The primary healthcare provider (HCP) for HS in 65% (128/196) of patients was a dermatologist, with 12% (23/196) seen at an HS specialty clinic. Most respondents never tried a biologic medicine (62%, 118/192). The top barriers to biologics were fear of side effects (61%, 109/179), high cost/lack of insurance coverage (46%, 83/179), frequency of weekly injections (32%, 58/179). Respondents reporting their main HCP as a non-dermatologist (4.11 vs 3.0, <i>p</i> < .0001) and not seen at a HS specialty clinic (3.5 vs 2.7, 0.039) were significantly more likely to agree 'I do not know enough about how biologics work to help my HS'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results highlight the importance of specialty care in the education and implementation of biologics. Patients may benefit from comprehensive discussion prior to starting biologics.</p>","PeriodicalId":15639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biologic use in hidradenitis suppurativa: patient perspectives and barriers.\",\"authors\":\"Devea R De, Terri Shih, Denise Fixsen, Brindley Brooks, Jennifer L Hsiao, Vivian Y Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09546634.2022.2089336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory dermatosis for which the treatment paradigm is rapidly expanding. We aimed to identify HS patient perspectives and barriers on biologics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous survey was distributed between 10/2021 and 1/2022 through HS support groups. Data regarding demographics and perspectives on biologics were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 196 respondents, 92% were female (180/196) and 75% were white (147/196). 89.3% had Hurley stage 2/3 HS (102/195). The primary healthcare provider (HCP) for HS in 65% (128/196) of patients was a dermatologist, with 12% (23/196) seen at an HS specialty clinic. Most respondents never tried a biologic medicine (62%, 118/192). The top barriers to biologics were fear of side effects (61%, 109/179), high cost/lack of insurance coverage (46%, 83/179), frequency of weekly injections (32%, 58/179). Respondents reporting their main HCP as a non-dermatologist (4.11 vs 3.0, <i>p</i> < .0001) and not seen at a HS specialty clinic (3.5 vs 2.7, 0.039) were significantly more likely to agree 'I do not know enough about how biologics work to help my HS'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results highlight the importance of specialty care in the education and implementation of biologics. Patients may benefit from comprehensive discussion prior to starting biologics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dermatological Treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dermatological Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2022.2089336\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2022.2089336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
简介:化脓性汗腺炎(HS)是一种炎症性皮肤病,其治疗模式正在迅速扩大。我们的目的是确定HS患者对生物制剂的看法和障碍。方法:于2021年10月至2022年1月通过HS支持小组进行匿名调查。收集和分析了有关人口统计学和生物制剂观点的数据。结果:196名被调查者中,女性占92%(180/196),白人占75%(147/196)。89.3%为Hurley 2/3期HS(102/195)。65% (128/196) HS患者的初级卫生保健提供者(HCP)是皮肤科医生,12%(23/196)在HS专科诊所就诊。大多数受访者从未尝试过生物药物(62%,118/192)。最大的障碍是害怕副作用(61%,109/179),高成本/缺乏保险覆盖(46%,83/179),每周注射频率(32%,58/179)。受访者报告他们的主要HCP是非皮肤科医生(4.11 vs 3.0, p)。结论:我们的研究结果强调了专科护理在生物制剂教育和实施中的重要性。在开始使用生物制剂之前,患者可能受益于全面的讨论。
Biologic use in hidradenitis suppurativa: patient perspectives and barriers.
Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory dermatosis for which the treatment paradigm is rapidly expanding. We aimed to identify HS patient perspectives and barriers on biologics.
Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed between 10/2021 and 1/2022 through HS support groups. Data regarding demographics and perspectives on biologics were collected and analyzed.
Results: Of the 196 respondents, 92% were female (180/196) and 75% were white (147/196). 89.3% had Hurley stage 2/3 HS (102/195). The primary healthcare provider (HCP) for HS in 65% (128/196) of patients was a dermatologist, with 12% (23/196) seen at an HS specialty clinic. Most respondents never tried a biologic medicine (62%, 118/192). The top barriers to biologics were fear of side effects (61%, 109/179), high cost/lack of insurance coverage (46%, 83/179), frequency of weekly injections (32%, 58/179). Respondents reporting their main HCP as a non-dermatologist (4.11 vs 3.0, p < .0001) and not seen at a HS specialty clinic (3.5 vs 2.7, 0.039) were significantly more likely to agree 'I do not know enough about how biologics work to help my HS'.
Conclusion: Our results highlight the importance of specialty care in the education and implementation of biologics. Patients may benefit from comprehensive discussion prior to starting biologics.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dermatological Treatment covers all aspects of the treatment of skin disease, including the use of topical and systematically administered drugs and other forms of therapy. The Journal of Dermatological Treatment is positioned to give dermatologists cutting edge information on new treatments in all areas of dermatology. It also publishes valuable clinical reviews and theoretical papers on dermatological treatments.