一种新的直接再输血方法,减少下行和胸腹动脉瘤修复中的输血量。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-14 DOI:10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12415-8
Lizette Karlsson, Ali Babaie-Khojini, Linus Blohmé, Alireza Daryapeyma, Anders Günther, Lena Nilsson, Carl-Magnus Wahlgren, Anders Franco-Cereceda, Christian Olsson
{"title":"一种新的直接再输血方法,减少下行和胸腹动脉瘤修复中的输血量。","authors":"Lizette Karlsson,&nbsp;Ali Babaie-Khojini,&nbsp;Linus Blohmé,&nbsp;Alireza Daryapeyma,&nbsp;Anders Günther,&nbsp;Lena Nilsson,&nbsp;Carl-Magnus Wahlgren,&nbsp;Anders Franco-Cereceda,&nbsp;Christian Olsson","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12415-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allogenic blood product usage is associated with worse outcomes in open repair of descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. This pilot study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel modification of the left heart bypass (LHB) circuit to reduce intraoperative blood transfusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In modified LHB, pump suckers collected shed blood that was directly retransfused through a femoral vein cannula. In standard LHB, cellsavers were used to collect, wash, and retransfuse shed blood. Consecutive patients undergoing elective surgical descending or thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair using modified (N.=12) or standard (N.=21) LHB were compared. Intraoperative blood product use was the primary outcome. Hypotensive episodes, lactate levels, and adverse events (early mortality, spinal cord injury, renal and respiratory insufficiency) were secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups were comparable regarding pre- and intraoperative variables. No perfusion-related adverse events occurred. With modified LHB, intraoperative blood product use was significantly reduced: packed red blood cells by 60% from 10 to 4 units (P=0.002), fresh frozen plasma by 70% from 17 to 5 units (P<0.001) as well as retransfused cellsaver volume by 75%, from 4500 mL to 1110 mL (P<0.001). Hemodynamic instability occurred in 1 (8.3%) vs. 6 (29%), P=0.22 and overall lactate levels were significantly reduced (P=0.045) with modified LHB. Adverse events combined occurred in 1/12 vs. (P=0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel modified LHB with direct retransfusion was safe and associated with significantly reduced intraoperative blood product use, reduced lactate production and improved clinical outcomes as compared to standard LHB and could represent an important clinical improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel method for direct retransfusion reduces blood transfusions in descending and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.\",\"authors\":\"Lizette Karlsson,&nbsp;Ali Babaie-Khojini,&nbsp;Linus Blohmé,&nbsp;Alireza Daryapeyma,&nbsp;Anders Günther,&nbsp;Lena Nilsson,&nbsp;Carl-Magnus Wahlgren,&nbsp;Anders Franco-Cereceda,&nbsp;Christian Olsson\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12415-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allogenic blood product usage is associated with worse outcomes in open repair of descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. This pilot study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel modification of the left heart bypass (LHB) circuit to reduce intraoperative blood transfusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In modified LHB, pump suckers collected shed blood that was directly retransfused through a femoral vein cannula. In standard LHB, cellsavers were used to collect, wash, and retransfuse shed blood. Consecutive patients undergoing elective surgical descending or thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair using modified (N.=12) or standard (N.=21) LHB were compared. Intraoperative blood product use was the primary outcome. Hypotensive episodes, lactate levels, and adverse events (early mortality, spinal cord injury, renal and respiratory insufficiency) were secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups were comparable regarding pre- and intraoperative variables. No perfusion-related adverse events occurred. With modified LHB, intraoperative blood product use was significantly reduced: packed red blood cells by 60% from 10 to 4 units (P=0.002), fresh frozen plasma by 70% from 17 to 5 units (P<0.001) as well as retransfused cellsaver volume by 75%, from 4500 mL to 1110 mL (P<0.001). Hemodynamic instability occurred in 1 (8.3%) vs. 6 (29%), P=0.22 and overall lactate levels were significantly reduced (P=0.045) with modified LHB. Adverse events combined occurred in 1/12 vs. (P=0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel modified LHB with direct retransfusion was safe and associated with significantly reduced intraoperative blood product use, reduced lactate production and improved clinical outcomes as compared to standard LHB and could represent an important clinical improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12415-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12415-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:同种异体血液制品的使用与开放性下行动脉瘤和胸腹主动脉瘤的修复预后较差相关。这项初步研究评估了左心搭桥(LHB)回路的新型修改以减少术中输血的安全性和有效性。方法:改良LHB采用泵吸器收集出血,经股静脉插管直接再输。在标准LHB中,使用细胞保存器收集、清洗和再输出血。采用改良LHB (n =12)或标准LHB (n =21)连续行择期下行手术或胸腹动脉瘤修复的患者进行比较。术中血液制品的使用是主要结局。低血压发作、乳酸水平和不良事件(早期死亡、脊髓损伤、肾脏和呼吸功能不全)是次要结局。结果:各组在术前和术中变量方面具有可比性。无灌注相关不良事件发生。改良的LHB显著减少了术中血液制品的使用:包装红细胞从10个单位减少到4个单位,减少60% (P=0.002),新鲜冷冻血浆从17个单位减少到5个单位,减少70% (P结论:与标准LHB相比,直接输血的新型改良LHB是安全的,术中血液制品使用显著减少,乳酸生成减少,临床结果改善,可能代表着重要的临床改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Novel method for direct retransfusion reduces blood transfusions in descending and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.

Background: Allogenic blood product usage is associated with worse outcomes in open repair of descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. This pilot study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel modification of the left heart bypass (LHB) circuit to reduce intraoperative blood transfusions.

Methods: In modified LHB, pump suckers collected shed blood that was directly retransfused through a femoral vein cannula. In standard LHB, cellsavers were used to collect, wash, and retransfuse shed blood. Consecutive patients undergoing elective surgical descending or thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair using modified (N.=12) or standard (N.=21) LHB were compared. Intraoperative blood product use was the primary outcome. Hypotensive episodes, lactate levels, and adverse events (early mortality, spinal cord injury, renal and respiratory insufficiency) were secondary outcomes.

Results: Groups were comparable regarding pre- and intraoperative variables. No perfusion-related adverse events occurred. With modified LHB, intraoperative blood product use was significantly reduced: packed red blood cells by 60% from 10 to 4 units (P=0.002), fresh frozen plasma by 70% from 17 to 5 units (P<0.001) as well as retransfused cellsaver volume by 75%, from 4500 mL to 1110 mL (P<0.001). Hemodynamic instability occurred in 1 (8.3%) vs. 6 (29%), P=0.22 and overall lactate levels were significantly reduced (P=0.045) with modified LHB. Adverse events combined occurred in 1/12 vs. (P=0.022).

Conclusions: The novel modified LHB with direct retransfusion was safe and associated with significantly reduced intraoperative blood product use, reduced lactate production and improved clinical outcomes as compared to standard LHB and could represent an important clinical improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery publishes scientific papers on cardiac, thoracic and vascular surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Subclavian artery revascularization with subclavian-carotid transposition for TEVAR and non-TEVAR patients. Current perspectives in acute type B aortic dissections: a literature review. Long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes of Omniflow® II prosthesis used for revascularization in the femoral tract both in infected and non-infected setting. Frozen elephant trunk technique for aortic arch surgery: the Bordeaux University Hospital experience with Thoraflex hybrid prosthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1