Marina Meireles dos Santos , Julia Klaczko , Ana Lúcia da Costa Prudente
{"title":"误食蛇的两性二态性和异速性(双翅蛇科:双翅蛇科)","authors":"Marina Meireles dos Santos , Julia Klaczko , Ana Lúcia da Costa Prudente","doi":"10.1016/j.zool.2022.126026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Sexual dimorphism in snakes is generally described in association with body or tail size and scale counts, with relatively few studies addressing intrasexual divergence in the skull. Here, we analyzed sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of skull and body in three malacophagous dipsadine snakes, </span><em>Dipsas mikanii</em>, <em>Dipsas neuwiedi</em> and <em>Dipsas turgida</em>, as well as allometric effect on these components. We used linear and geometric analysis to assess: (1) if there is sexual dimorphism in cranial components; (2) if there are differences between the sexes regarding body and tail size, number of ventral and subcaudal scales; (3) whether there is covariation between cranial components and body size; (4) if there are changes in cranial shape associated with increased size; and (5) whether there is an allometric relationship between body and tail size. Our results showed that all three species are dimorphic in cranial shape and size (except <em>D. turgida</em><span> for cranial size), with females having longer and thinner skulls than males. In the three species, the female skull was negatively allometric, whereas the male skull was isometric. Allometry related to cranial shape was significant only in males of </span><em>D. turgida</em>, which showed greater snout robustness and eye size associated with enlargement of the skull. Females of <em>D. mikanii</em> and <em>D. neuwiedi</em> were significantly larger than males. Only males of <em>D. neuwiedi</em> showed positive allometry for the tail, while dimorphism related to scale counts followed the pattern found in most snakes, with females having a greater number of ventrals and males subcaudals (except <em>D. neuwiedi</em><span> in the latter case). Based on our results, we hypothesize that patterns of sexual dimorphism and skull allometry in malacophagous snakes may be explained both by aspects related to diet and reproduction. Meanwhile, patterns associated with body size reflect advantages related to fecundity favoring greater reproductive success of females.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49330,"journal":{"name":"Zoology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual dimorphism and allometry in malacophagus snakes (Dipsadidae: Dipsadinae)\",\"authors\":\"Marina Meireles dos Santos , Julia Klaczko , Ana Lúcia da Costa Prudente\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zool.2022.126026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Sexual dimorphism in snakes is generally described in association with body or tail size and scale counts, with relatively few studies addressing intrasexual divergence in the skull. Here, we analyzed sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of skull and body in three malacophagous dipsadine snakes, </span><em>Dipsas mikanii</em>, <em>Dipsas neuwiedi</em> and <em>Dipsas turgida</em>, as well as allometric effect on these components. We used linear and geometric analysis to assess: (1) if there is sexual dimorphism in cranial components; (2) if there are differences between the sexes regarding body and tail size, number of ventral and subcaudal scales; (3) whether there is covariation between cranial components and body size; (4) if there are changes in cranial shape associated with increased size; and (5) whether there is an allometric relationship between body and tail size. Our results showed that all three species are dimorphic in cranial shape and size (except <em>D. turgida</em><span> for cranial size), with females having longer and thinner skulls than males. In the three species, the female skull was negatively allometric, whereas the male skull was isometric. Allometry related to cranial shape was significant only in males of </span><em>D. turgida</em>, which showed greater snout robustness and eye size associated with enlargement of the skull. Females of <em>D. mikanii</em> and <em>D. neuwiedi</em> were significantly larger than males. Only males of <em>D. neuwiedi</em> showed positive allometry for the tail, while dimorphism related to scale counts followed the pattern found in most snakes, with females having a greater number of ventrals and males subcaudals (except <em>D. neuwiedi</em><span> in the latter case). Based on our results, we hypothesize that patterns of sexual dimorphism and skull allometry in malacophagous snakes may be explained both by aspects related to diet and reproduction. Meanwhile, patterns associated with body size reflect advantages related to fecundity favoring greater reproductive success of females.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zoology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zoology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0944200622000277\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0944200622000277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sexual dimorphism and allometry in malacophagus snakes (Dipsadidae: Dipsadinae)
Sexual dimorphism in snakes is generally described in association with body or tail size and scale counts, with relatively few studies addressing intrasexual divergence in the skull. Here, we analyzed sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of skull and body in three malacophagous dipsadine snakes, Dipsas mikanii, Dipsas neuwiedi and Dipsas turgida, as well as allometric effect on these components. We used linear and geometric analysis to assess: (1) if there is sexual dimorphism in cranial components; (2) if there are differences between the sexes regarding body and tail size, number of ventral and subcaudal scales; (3) whether there is covariation between cranial components and body size; (4) if there are changes in cranial shape associated with increased size; and (5) whether there is an allometric relationship between body and tail size. Our results showed that all three species are dimorphic in cranial shape and size (except D. turgida for cranial size), with females having longer and thinner skulls than males. In the three species, the female skull was negatively allometric, whereas the male skull was isometric. Allometry related to cranial shape was significant only in males of D. turgida, which showed greater snout robustness and eye size associated with enlargement of the skull. Females of D. mikanii and D. neuwiedi were significantly larger than males. Only males of D. neuwiedi showed positive allometry for the tail, while dimorphism related to scale counts followed the pattern found in most snakes, with females having a greater number of ventrals and males subcaudals (except D. neuwiedi in the latter case). Based on our results, we hypothesize that patterns of sexual dimorphism and skull allometry in malacophagous snakes may be explained both by aspects related to diet and reproduction. Meanwhile, patterns associated with body size reflect advantages related to fecundity favoring greater reproductive success of females.
期刊介绍:
Zoology is a journal devoted to experimental and comparative animal science. It presents a common forum for all scientists who take an explicitly organism oriented and integrative approach to the study of animal form, function, development and evolution.
The journal invites papers that take a comparative or experimental approach to behavior and neurobiology, functional morphology, evolution and development, ecological physiology, and cell biology. Due to the increasing realization that animals exist only within a partnership with symbionts, Zoology encourages submissions of papers focused on the analysis of holobionts or metaorganisms as associations of the macroscopic host in synergistic interdependence with numerous microbial and eukaryotic species.
The editors and the editorial board are committed to presenting science at its best. The editorial team is regularly adjusting editorial practice to the ever changing field of animal biology.