{"title":"使中间的混乱更加混乱","authors":"Esteban E. Sarmiento, Martin Pickford","doi":"10.1002/evan.21952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In an <i>Evolutionary Anthropology</i> article Roksandic et al. (2022) propose a new middle Pleistocene hominin species <i>H. bodoensis</i> to replace a “poorly defined” <i>Homo heidelbergenis</i>. <i>Homo bodoensis</i> extends from the African Middle Pleistocene through the Levant to South-eastern Europe with all currently classified <i>H. heidelbergensis</i> fossils from western Europe subsumed into <i>Homo neandertalensis</i>. The authors claim their new species will be more clearly defined than <i>H. heidelbergensis</i> and will better describe hominin variation and evolution in the middle Pleistocene. Roksandic et al. are unable to account for some European fossils (i.e., Petralona and Arago) and provide no evidence as to how their new species meets their objectives. Fatally, they overlook the priority rule and fail to realize that <i>H. bodoensis</i> is both a junior synonym of <i>Homo rhodesiensis</i> and <i>Homo saldanensis</i>. Roksandic et al. conflate taxonomy with phylogeny, present hypotheses as facts, and harbor many systematic and evolutionary misconceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47849,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Anthropology","volume":"31 5","pages":"237-239"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muddying the muddle in the middle even more\",\"authors\":\"Esteban E. Sarmiento, Martin Pickford\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/evan.21952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In an <i>Evolutionary Anthropology</i> article Roksandic et al. (2022) propose a new middle Pleistocene hominin species <i>H. bodoensis</i> to replace a “poorly defined” <i>Homo heidelbergenis</i>. <i>Homo bodoensis</i> extends from the African Middle Pleistocene through the Levant to South-eastern Europe with all currently classified <i>H. heidelbergensis</i> fossils from western Europe subsumed into <i>Homo neandertalensis</i>. The authors claim their new species will be more clearly defined than <i>H. heidelbergensis</i> and will better describe hominin variation and evolution in the middle Pleistocene. Roksandic et al. are unable to account for some European fossils (i.e., Petralona and Arago) and provide no evidence as to how their new species meets their objectives. Fatally, they overlook the priority rule and fail to realize that <i>H. bodoensis</i> is both a junior synonym of <i>Homo rhodesiensis</i> and <i>Homo saldanensis</i>. Roksandic et al. conflate taxonomy with phylogeny, present hypotheses as facts, and harbor many systematic and evolutionary misconceptions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolutionary Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"237-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolutionary Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/evan.21952\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/evan.21952","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
在一篇进化人类学的文章中,Roksandic et al.(2022)提出了一个新的中更新世人类物种H. bodoensis,以取代“定义不清”的海德堡人。人类从非洲中更新世到黎凡特再到东南欧,目前所有来自西欧的海德堡人化石都被归入尼安德特人。作者声称,他们的新物种将比海德堡人定义得更清楚,并将更好地描述更新世中期的人族变异和进化。Roksandic等人无法解释一些欧洲化石(即Petralona和Arago),也没有提供证据说明他们的新物种如何满足他们的目标。致命的是,他们忽视了优先规则,没有意识到H. bodoensis既是罗德西亚人(Homo rhodesiensis)和萨尔达尼人(Homo saldanensis)的初级同义词。Roksandic等人将分类学与系统发生学混为一谈,把假设当作事实,并对许多系统的和进化的错误观念持保留态度。
In an Evolutionary Anthropology article Roksandic et al. (2022) propose a new middle Pleistocene hominin species H. bodoensis to replace a “poorly defined” Homo heidelbergenis. Homo bodoensis extends from the African Middle Pleistocene through the Levant to South-eastern Europe with all currently classified H. heidelbergensis fossils from western Europe subsumed into Homo neandertalensis. The authors claim their new species will be more clearly defined than H. heidelbergensis and will better describe hominin variation and evolution in the middle Pleistocene. Roksandic et al. are unable to account for some European fossils (i.e., Petralona and Arago) and provide no evidence as to how their new species meets their objectives. Fatally, they overlook the priority rule and fail to realize that H. bodoensis is both a junior synonym of Homo rhodesiensis and Homo saldanensis. Roksandic et al. conflate taxonomy with phylogeny, present hypotheses as facts, and harbor many systematic and evolutionary misconceptions.
期刊介绍:
Evolutionary Anthropology is an authoritative review journal that focuses on issues of current interest in biological anthropology, paleoanthropology, archaeology, functional morphology, social biology, and bone biology — including dentition and osteology — as well as human biology, genetics, and ecology. In addition to lively, well-illustrated articles reviewing contemporary research efforts, this journal also publishes general news of relevant developments in the scientific, social, or political arenas. Reviews of noteworthy new books are also included, as are letters to the editor and listings of various conferences. The journal provides a valuable source of current information for classroom teaching and research activities in evolutionary anthropology.