使中间的混乱更加混乱

IF 4.6 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Evolutionary Anthropology Pub Date : 2022-06-27 DOI:10.1002/evan.21952
Esteban E. Sarmiento, Martin Pickford
{"title":"使中间的混乱更加混乱","authors":"Esteban E. Sarmiento,&nbsp;Martin Pickford","doi":"10.1002/evan.21952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In an <i>Evolutionary Anthropology</i> article Roksandic et al. (2022) propose a new middle Pleistocene hominin species <i>H. bodoensis</i> to replace a “poorly defined” <i>Homo heidelbergenis</i>. <i>Homo bodoensis</i> extends from the African Middle Pleistocene through the Levant to South-eastern Europe with all currently classified <i>H. heidelbergensis</i> fossils from western Europe subsumed into <i>Homo neandertalensis</i>. The authors claim their new species will be more clearly defined than <i>H. heidelbergensis</i> and will better describe hominin variation and evolution in the middle Pleistocene. Roksandic et al. are unable to account for some European fossils (i.e., Petralona and Arago) and provide no evidence as to how their new species meets their objectives. Fatally, they overlook the priority rule and fail to realize that <i>H. bodoensis</i> is both a junior synonym of <i>Homo rhodesiensis</i> and <i>Homo saldanensis</i>. Roksandic et al. conflate taxonomy with phylogeny, present hypotheses as facts, and harbor many systematic and evolutionary misconceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47849,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Anthropology","volume":"31 5","pages":"237-239"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muddying the muddle in the middle even more\",\"authors\":\"Esteban E. Sarmiento,&nbsp;Martin Pickford\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/evan.21952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In an <i>Evolutionary Anthropology</i> article Roksandic et al. (2022) propose a new middle Pleistocene hominin species <i>H. bodoensis</i> to replace a “poorly defined” <i>Homo heidelbergenis</i>. <i>Homo bodoensis</i> extends from the African Middle Pleistocene through the Levant to South-eastern Europe with all currently classified <i>H. heidelbergensis</i> fossils from western Europe subsumed into <i>Homo neandertalensis</i>. The authors claim their new species will be more clearly defined than <i>H. heidelbergensis</i> and will better describe hominin variation and evolution in the middle Pleistocene. Roksandic et al. are unable to account for some European fossils (i.e., Petralona and Arago) and provide no evidence as to how their new species meets their objectives. Fatally, they overlook the priority rule and fail to realize that <i>H. bodoensis</i> is both a junior synonym of <i>Homo rhodesiensis</i> and <i>Homo saldanensis</i>. Roksandic et al. conflate taxonomy with phylogeny, present hypotheses as facts, and harbor many systematic and evolutionary misconceptions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolutionary Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"237-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolutionary Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/evan.21952\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/evan.21952","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在一篇进化人类学的文章中,Roksandic et al.(2022)提出了一个新的中更新世人类物种H. bodoensis,以取代“定义不清”的海德堡人。人类从非洲中更新世到黎凡特再到东南欧,目前所有来自西欧的海德堡人化石都被归入尼安德特人。作者声称,他们的新物种将比海德堡人定义得更清楚,并将更好地描述更新世中期的人族变异和进化。Roksandic等人无法解释一些欧洲化石(即Petralona和Arago),也没有提供证据说明他们的新物种如何满足他们的目标。致命的是,他们忽视了优先规则,没有意识到H. bodoensis既是罗德西亚人(Homo rhodesiensis)和萨尔达尼人(Homo saldanensis)的初级同义词。Roksandic等人将分类学与系统发生学混为一谈,把假设当作事实,并对许多系统的和进化的错误观念持保留态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Muddying the muddle in the middle even more

In an Evolutionary Anthropology article Roksandic et al. (2022) propose a new middle Pleistocene hominin species H. bodoensis to replace a “poorly defined” Homo heidelbergenis. Homo bodoensis extends from the African Middle Pleistocene through the Levant to South-eastern Europe with all currently classified H. heidelbergensis fossils from western Europe subsumed into Homo neandertalensis. The authors claim their new species will be more clearly defined than H. heidelbergensis and will better describe hominin variation and evolution in the middle Pleistocene. Roksandic et al. are unable to account for some European fossils (i.e., Petralona and Arago) and provide no evidence as to how their new species meets their objectives. Fatally, they overlook the priority rule and fail to realize that H. bodoensis is both a junior synonym of Homo rhodesiensis and Homo saldanensis. Roksandic et al. conflate taxonomy with phylogeny, present hypotheses as facts, and harbor many systematic and evolutionary misconceptions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.40%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Anthropology is an authoritative review journal that focuses on issues of current interest in biological anthropology, paleoanthropology, archaeology, functional morphology, social biology, and bone biology — including dentition and osteology — as well as human biology, genetics, and ecology. In addition to lively, well-illustrated articles reviewing contemporary research efforts, this journal also publishes general news of relevant developments in the scientific, social, or political arenas. Reviews of noteworthy new books are also included, as are letters to the editor and listings of various conferences. The journal provides a valuable source of current information for classroom teaching and research activities in evolutionary anthropology.
期刊最新文献
A biochronological date of 3.6 million years for "Little Foot" (StW 573, Australopithecus prometheus from Sterkfontein, South Africa). The evolutionary origin of human kissing. Issue Information Issue Information Back(s) to basics: The concept of backing in stone tool technologies for tracing hominins' technical innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1