女性主义开启复原力:伊丽莎白-格罗斯、利比里亚和平小屋和 IR 批判。

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of International Relations and Development Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-13 DOI:10.1057/s41268-022-00264-0
Maria Martin de Almagro, Pol Bargués
{"title":"女性主义开启复原力:伊丽莎白-格罗斯、利比里亚和平小屋和 IR 批判。","authors":"Maria Martin de Almagro, Pol Bargués","doi":"10.1057/s41268-022-00264-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the United Nations (UN) and other international organisations have celebrated the 20th anniversary of the Women, Peace and Security agenda, critical scholars claim that the agenda has rarely been able to foster resilience. They show how programmes have only slowly and partially achieved gender balancing and parity in war-affected countries. The limitation we identify in the debate between policy and critique is that resilience has often been reduced to an egalitarian project-where mechanical policies and schemes are deployed to ameliorate the conditions of women, enhance their participation in decision-making and pursue the equality between women and men-to advance in sustaining peace. In this article we complement the existing critiques by engaging with the feminist writings of Elizabeth Grosz, as well as with indigenous feminist practices in Liberia. We nurture a feminism that affirms the agency and inventiveness of women to begin to reimagine resilience as difference: a resilience that thrives outside governance structures and the confines of neoliberal policymaking.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41268-022-00264-0.</p>","PeriodicalId":46698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Relations and Development","volume":"25 4","pages":"967-992"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A feminist opening of resilience: Elizabeth Grosz, Liberian Peace Huts and IR critiques.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Martin de Almagro, Pol Bargués\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41268-022-00264-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While the United Nations (UN) and other international organisations have celebrated the 20th anniversary of the Women, Peace and Security agenda, critical scholars claim that the agenda has rarely been able to foster resilience. They show how programmes have only slowly and partially achieved gender balancing and parity in war-affected countries. The limitation we identify in the debate between policy and critique is that resilience has often been reduced to an egalitarian project-where mechanical policies and schemes are deployed to ameliorate the conditions of women, enhance their participation in decision-making and pursue the equality between women and men-to advance in sustaining peace. In this article we complement the existing critiques by engaging with the feminist writings of Elizabeth Grosz, as well as with indigenous feminist practices in Liberia. We nurture a feminism that affirms the agency and inventiveness of women to begin to reimagine resilience as difference: a resilience that thrives outside governance structures and the confines of neoliberal policymaking.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41268-022-00264-0.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Relations and Development\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"967-992\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375057/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Relations and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-022-00264-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Relations and Development","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-022-00264-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管联合国和其他国际组织已经庆祝了妇女、和平与安全议程 20 周年,但持批评态度的学者声称,该议程很少能够促进复原力。他们指出,在受战争影响的国家,这些计划只是缓慢地、部分地实现了性别平衡和均等。我们在政策与批评之间的辩论中发现的局限性在于,抗灾能力往往被简化为一个平等主义项目--在这个项目中,机械地部署政策和计划,以改善妇女的状况,加强她们在决策中的参与,追求男女平等,从而推进和平的持续。在本文中,我们结合伊丽莎白-格罗斯(Elizabeth Grosz)的女权主义著作以及利比里亚本土的女权主义实践,对现有的批评意见进行了补充。我们培育了一种肯定妇女的能动性和创造性的女权主义,以开始重新想象作为差异的复原力:一种在治理结构和新自由主义决策限制之外茁壮成长的复原力:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1057/s41268-022-00264-0。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A feminist opening of resilience: Elizabeth Grosz, Liberian Peace Huts and IR critiques.

While the United Nations (UN) and other international organisations have celebrated the 20th anniversary of the Women, Peace and Security agenda, critical scholars claim that the agenda has rarely been able to foster resilience. They show how programmes have only slowly and partially achieved gender balancing and parity in war-affected countries. The limitation we identify in the debate between policy and critique is that resilience has often been reduced to an egalitarian project-where mechanical policies and schemes are deployed to ameliorate the conditions of women, enhance their participation in decision-making and pursue the equality between women and men-to advance in sustaining peace. In this article we complement the existing critiques by engaging with the feminist writings of Elizabeth Grosz, as well as with indigenous feminist practices in Liberia. We nurture a feminism that affirms the agency and inventiveness of women to begin to reimagine resilience as difference: a resilience that thrives outside governance structures and the confines of neoliberal policymaking.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41268-022-00264-0.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: JIRD is an independent and internationally peer-reviewed journal in international relations and international political economy. It publishes articles on contemporary world politics and the global political economy from a variety of methodologies and approaches. The journal, whose history goes back to 1984, has been established to encourage scholarly publications by authors coming from Central/Eastern Europe. Open to all scholars since its refoundation in the late 1990s, yet keeping this initial aim, it applied a rigorous peer-review system and became the official journal of the Central and East European International Studies Association (CEEISA). JIRD seeks original manuscripts that provide theoretically informed empirical analyses of issues in international relations and international political economy, as well as original theoretical or conceptual analyses.
期刊最新文献
Placing machine learning into the hermeneutic circle: a combined computational-interpretive method for text analysis Translating global norms on crime to schools: analysing textbook lessons on the trafficking of humans in the United States, Nigeria and Germany Strangers from the middle of nowhere? Manaf Halbouni’s Monument and the politics of proximity When structural factors that cause interethnic violence work in favour of peace: The story of Baljvine, a warless Bosnian-Herzegovinian peace mosaic Forum-shifting from above and below: international stratification and the fragmentation of the nuclear non-proliferation regime complex
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1