Riberi María Inés, Hernandez Toledo Marina Gabriela, Cid Mariana Paula, Tenaglia María Magdalena, Alfaro Jimena, Konigheim Brenda Salome, Aguilar Juan Javier, Blanco Sebastián, Spinsanti Lorena, Díaz Luis Adrián, Rivarola Elisa, Beranek Mauricio, Bottiglieri Marina Tersita, Gallego Sandra Verónica, Isa María Beatriz
{"title":"Elecsys Anti-SARS CoV-2 (Roche)和VIDAS Anti-SARS CoV-2 (biomsamrieux)检测SARS-CoV-2核衣壳和刺突蛋白抗体的性能","authors":"Riberi María Inés, Hernandez Toledo Marina Gabriela, Cid Mariana Paula, Tenaglia María Magdalena, Alfaro Jimena, Konigheim Brenda Salome, Aguilar Juan Javier, Blanco Sebastián, Spinsanti Lorena, Díaz Luis Adrián, Rivarola Elisa, Beranek Mauricio, Bottiglieri Marina Tersita, Gallego Sandra Verónica, Isa María Beatriz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the novel viral pathogen that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in humans, has spread worldwide since its identification in late 2019. The pandemic produced an accelerated development of new serological techniques for diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated two commercial assays for serological diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, approved by the Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica (ANMAT) in Argentina: Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2; Roche for nucleocapsid total antibody detection, and VIDAS Anti-SARS-CoV-2 bioMérieux for spike protein IgG antibody detection. Sensitivity was assessed using a panel of 92 plasma samples from recovered COVID-19 patients who were positive for RT-PCR and positive for neutralizing antibodies by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and/or positive for IgG antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Specificity was determined studying 71 plasma samples collected during year 2018 prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Assays were evaluated as stand-alone tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity was 97.8% and 98.9% for the Roche and bioMérieux assays, respectively, specificity: 98.5% (Roche) and 97.1% (bioMérieux), positive predictive value (PPV): 98.9% (Roche) and 97.8% (bioMérieux), and negative predictive value: (NPV) 97.2% (Roche) and 98.5% (bioMérieux). Additionally, Cohen's kappa coefficient demonstrated high concordance (k=0.950) between Roche and bioMérieux.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In conclusion, our results evidenced a very good performance for the nucleocapsid antibody assay (Roche) and the spike protein antibody assay (bioMérieux), thus both platforms are equally adequate for indirect diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection through total antibodies and IgG antibody detection, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"33 2","pages":"159-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/64/18/ejifcc-33-159.PMC9562483.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Elecsys Anti-SARS CoV-2 (Roche) and VIDAS Anti-SARS CoV-2 (Biomérieux) for SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid and Spike Protein Antibody Detection.\",\"authors\":\"Riberi María Inés, Hernandez Toledo Marina Gabriela, Cid Mariana Paula, Tenaglia María Magdalena, Alfaro Jimena, Konigheim Brenda Salome, Aguilar Juan Javier, Blanco Sebastián, Spinsanti Lorena, Díaz Luis Adrián, Rivarola Elisa, Beranek Mauricio, Bottiglieri Marina Tersita, Gallego Sandra Verónica, Isa María Beatriz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the novel viral pathogen that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in humans, has spread worldwide since its identification in late 2019. The pandemic produced an accelerated development of new serological techniques for diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated two commercial assays for serological diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, approved by the Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica (ANMAT) in Argentina: Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2; Roche for nucleocapsid total antibody detection, and VIDAS Anti-SARS-CoV-2 bioMérieux for spike protein IgG antibody detection. Sensitivity was assessed using a panel of 92 plasma samples from recovered COVID-19 patients who were positive for RT-PCR and positive for neutralizing antibodies by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and/or positive for IgG antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Specificity was determined studying 71 plasma samples collected during year 2018 prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Assays were evaluated as stand-alone tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity was 97.8% and 98.9% for the Roche and bioMérieux assays, respectively, specificity: 98.5% (Roche) and 97.1% (bioMérieux), positive predictive value (PPV): 98.9% (Roche) and 97.8% (bioMérieux), and negative predictive value: (NPV) 97.2% (Roche) and 98.5% (bioMérieux). Additionally, Cohen's kappa coefficient demonstrated high concordance (k=0.950) between Roche and bioMérieux.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In conclusion, our results evidenced a very good performance for the nucleocapsid antibody assay (Roche) and the spike protein antibody assay (bioMérieux), thus both platforms are equally adequate for indirect diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection through total antibodies and IgG antibody detection, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"159-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/64/18/ejifcc-33-159.PMC9562483.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)是导致人类2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的新型病毒病原体,自2019年底被发现以来,已在全球传播。这次大流行加速了新的血清学诊断技术的发展。方法:我们评估了两种经阿根廷Administración national de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología mims - dica (ANMAT)批准的用于SARS-CoV-2感染血清学诊断的商业检测方法:Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2;Roche检测核衣壳总抗体,VIDAS Anti-SARS-CoV-2 biomsamrieux检测刺突蛋白IgG抗体。对92例经RT-PCR检测阳性、斑块减少中和试验(PRNT)中和抗体阳性和/或间接免疫荧光试验(IFA) IgG抗体阳性的康复COVID-19患者的血浆样本进行敏感性评估。通过研究2019冠状病毒病大流行前2018年收集的71份血浆样本,确定了特异性。测定作为独立试验进行评估。结果:Roche和biomacrieux检测的敏感性分别为97.8%和98.9%,特异性分别为98.5% (Roche)和97.1% (biomacrieux),阳性预测值(PPV)分别为98.9% (Roche)和97.8% (biomacrieux),阴性预测值(NPV)分别为97.2% (Roche)和98.5% (biomacrieux)。此外,Cohen’s kappa系数显示Roche和biomacrieux之间的一致性很高(k=0.950)。综上所述,我们的结果证明了核衣壳抗体检测(Roche)和刺突蛋白抗体检测(biomacimrieux)的性能非常好,因此这两个平台分别通过检测总抗体和IgG抗体来间接诊断SARS-CoV-2感染。
Performance of Elecsys Anti-SARS CoV-2 (Roche) and VIDAS Anti-SARS CoV-2 (Biomérieux) for SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid and Spike Protein Antibody Detection.
Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the novel viral pathogen that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in humans, has spread worldwide since its identification in late 2019. The pandemic produced an accelerated development of new serological techniques for diagnosis.
Methods: We evaluated two commercial assays for serological diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, approved by the Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica (ANMAT) in Argentina: Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2; Roche for nucleocapsid total antibody detection, and VIDAS Anti-SARS-CoV-2 bioMérieux for spike protein IgG antibody detection. Sensitivity was assessed using a panel of 92 plasma samples from recovered COVID-19 patients who were positive for RT-PCR and positive for neutralizing antibodies by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and/or positive for IgG antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Specificity was determined studying 71 plasma samples collected during year 2018 prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Assays were evaluated as stand-alone tests.
Results: Sensitivity was 97.8% and 98.9% for the Roche and bioMérieux assays, respectively, specificity: 98.5% (Roche) and 97.1% (bioMérieux), positive predictive value (PPV): 98.9% (Roche) and 97.8% (bioMérieux), and negative predictive value: (NPV) 97.2% (Roche) and 98.5% (bioMérieux). Additionally, Cohen's kappa coefficient demonstrated high concordance (k=0.950) between Roche and bioMérieux.
Discussion: In conclusion, our results evidenced a very good performance for the nucleocapsid antibody assay (Roche) and the spike protein antibody assay (bioMérieux), thus both platforms are equally adequate for indirect diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection through total antibodies and IgG antibody detection, respectively.