糖尿病和非糖尿病患者24小时动态监测和办公室血压变异性的比较:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE International Journal of Hypertension Pub Date : 2022-06-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/1022044
Ana Lídia Rouxinol-Dias, Marta Lisandra Gonçalves, Diogo Ramalho, Jose Silva, Loide Barbosa, Jorge Polónia
{"title":"糖尿病和非糖尿病患者24小时动态监测和办公室血压变异性的比较:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Ana Lídia Rouxinol-Dias,&nbsp;Marta Lisandra Gonçalves,&nbsp;Diogo Ramalho,&nbsp;Jose Silva,&nbsp;Loide Barbosa,&nbsp;Jorge Polónia","doi":"10.1155/2022/1022044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence regarding blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) and its independent association with adverse outcomes has grown. Diabetic patients might have increased BPV, but there is still an evidence gap regarding relation between BPV and type 2 diabetes beyond mean values of BP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the relationship between 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM, short-term variability) and visit-to-visit in-office BPV (OBP, long-term variability), in diabetics (<i>D</i>) and nondiabetics (ND), and to explore BPV relation with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and pulse wave velocity (PWV) as indicators of target organ lesion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center cross-sectional study in an outpatient BP unit, including adult patients consecutively admitted from 1999 to 2019. Multivariate was performed to compare BPV between <i>D</i> and ND adjusted for clinical variables. Pearson's correlation was performed to evaluate relation of BPV with eGFR and PWV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1123 patients with ABPM and OBP measurements were included. Values of eGFR and PWV were worse in <i>D</i> than in ND. Measurements of OBPV did not differ between groups. Of ABPM BPV, the coefficient of variation and standard deviation for daytime systolic BP were higher in <i>D</i> compared to ND, but only in ND did BPV correlated with both eGFR and PWV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that diabetes is associated with higher variability of daytime BP than nondiabetics along with worse damage of vascular and renal function. However, in contrast to nondiabetics, in diabetics eGFR and PWV may not be dependent on BP variability, suggesting that other mechanisms might explain more rigorously the greater damage of target organ lesion markers.</p>","PeriodicalId":14132,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"1022044"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Blood Pressure Variability between 24 h Ambulatory Monitoring and Office Blood Pressure in Diabetics and Nondiabetic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Lídia Rouxinol-Dias,&nbsp;Marta Lisandra Gonçalves,&nbsp;Diogo Ramalho,&nbsp;Jose Silva,&nbsp;Loide Barbosa,&nbsp;Jorge Polónia\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/1022044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence regarding blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) and its independent association with adverse outcomes has grown. Diabetic patients might have increased BPV, but there is still an evidence gap regarding relation between BPV and type 2 diabetes beyond mean values of BP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the relationship between 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM, short-term variability) and visit-to-visit in-office BPV (OBP, long-term variability), in diabetics (<i>D</i>) and nondiabetics (ND), and to explore BPV relation with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and pulse wave velocity (PWV) as indicators of target organ lesion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center cross-sectional study in an outpatient BP unit, including adult patients consecutively admitted from 1999 to 2019. Multivariate was performed to compare BPV between <i>D</i> and ND adjusted for clinical variables. Pearson's correlation was performed to evaluate relation of BPV with eGFR and PWV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1123 patients with ABPM and OBP measurements were included. Values of eGFR and PWV were worse in <i>D</i> than in ND. Measurements of OBPV did not differ between groups. Of ABPM BPV, the coefficient of variation and standard deviation for daytime systolic BP were higher in <i>D</i> compared to ND, but only in ND did BPV correlated with both eGFR and PWV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that diabetes is associated with higher variability of daytime BP than nondiabetics along with worse damage of vascular and renal function. However, in contrast to nondiabetics, in diabetics eGFR and PWV may not be dependent on BP variability, suggesting that other mechanisms might explain more rigorously the greater damage of target organ lesion markers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1022044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239826/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1022044\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1022044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于血压(BP)变异性(BPV)及其与不良结局的独立关联的证据越来越多。糖尿病患者可能有BPV升高,但BPV与2型糖尿病之间的关系仍存在证据差距。目的:探讨糖尿病(D)和非糖尿病(ND)患者24小时动态血压监测(ABPM,短期变异性)与BPV (OBP,长期变异性)之间的关系,并探讨BPV与肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和脉搏波速度(PWV)作为靶器官病变指标的关系。材料和方法:我们在门诊BP单元进行了一项单中心横断面研究,包括1999年至2019年连续入院的成年患者。采用多变量比较经临床变量调整后的D和ND之间的BPV。采用Pearson相关法评价BPV与eGFR、PWV的关系。结果:共纳入1123例ABPM和OBP测量患者。D组eGFR和PWV值低于ND组。两组间OBPV测量值无差异。在ABPM BPV中,D组白天收缩压的变异系数和标准差高于ND组,但只有ND组BPV与eGFR和PWV均相关。结论:与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者的日间血压变异性更高,血管和肾功能损害更严重。然而,与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者的eGFR和PWV可能不依赖于血压变异性,这表明其他机制可能更严格地解释了靶器官病变标志物的更大损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Blood Pressure Variability between 24 h Ambulatory Monitoring and Office Blood Pressure in Diabetics and Nondiabetic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Evidence regarding blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) and its independent association with adverse outcomes has grown. Diabetic patients might have increased BPV, but there is still an evidence gap regarding relation between BPV and type 2 diabetes beyond mean values of BP.

Objective: To examine the relationship between 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM, short-term variability) and visit-to-visit in-office BPV (OBP, long-term variability), in diabetics (D) and nondiabetics (ND), and to explore BPV relation with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and pulse wave velocity (PWV) as indicators of target organ lesion.

Materials and methods: We conducted a single-center cross-sectional study in an outpatient BP unit, including adult patients consecutively admitted from 1999 to 2019. Multivariate was performed to compare BPV between D and ND adjusted for clinical variables. Pearson's correlation was performed to evaluate relation of BPV with eGFR and PWV.

Results: A total of 1123 patients with ABPM and OBP measurements were included. Values of eGFR and PWV were worse in D than in ND. Measurements of OBPV did not differ between groups. Of ABPM BPV, the coefficient of variation and standard deviation for daytime systolic BP were higher in D compared to ND, but only in ND did BPV correlated with both eGFR and PWV.

Conclusion: We found that diabetes is associated with higher variability of daytime BP than nondiabetics along with worse damage of vascular and renal function. However, in contrast to nondiabetics, in diabetics eGFR and PWV may not be dependent on BP variability, suggesting that other mechanisms might explain more rigorously the greater damage of target organ lesion markers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Hypertension
International Journal of Hypertension Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: International Journal of Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for clinicians and basic scientists interested in blood pressure regulation and pathophysiology, as well as treatment and prevention of hypertension. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies on the etiology and risk factors of hypertension, with a special focus on vascular biology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, and hypertensive nephropathy.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Hydrogen Sulfide on Sympathoinhibition in Obese Pithed Rats and Participation of K+ Channel. Identifying Who Benefits the Most from a Community Health Worker-Led Multicomponent Intervention for Hypertension. Effects of Renal Denervation on Ouabain-Induced Hypertension in Rats. Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors Associated with Diagonal Earlobe Crease (Frank Sign) in Mexican Adults: Aging, Obesity, Arterial Hypertension, and Being Male Are the Most Important. Effect of Yogurt Intake Frequency on Blood Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1