腹腔镜和开放式根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗局部晚期上尿路癌的围手术期和肿瘤预后:一项单中心队列研究

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-14 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2022.103
Jorge Correia, Gonçalo Mendes, Bernardo Texeira, Mariana Madanelo, Avelino Fraga, Miguel Silva-Ramos
{"title":"腹腔镜和开放式根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗局部晚期上尿路癌的围手术期和肿瘤预后:一项单中心队列研究","authors":"Jorge Correia,&nbsp;Gonçalo Mendes,&nbsp;Bernardo Texeira,&nbsp;Mariana Madanelo,&nbsp;Avelino Fraga,&nbsp;Miguel Silva-Ramos","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2022.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Open radical nephroureterectomy (ONU) is the standard of care for treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), but laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LNU) is increasingly being used due to better perioperative outcomes. However, its oncological safety remains controversial, in particular for advanced disease.We aimed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between surgical approaches in locally advanced UTUC (≥pT3 and/or pN+).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective analysis of all 48 patients submitted to radical nephroureterectomy for advanced UTUC between 2006 and 2020 in our center.Perioperative data were compared between groups. Bladder tumor-free survival (BTFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with log-rank p test. Multivariable Cox regression model was used to evaluate their association with surgical approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical and pathological characteristics were similar between groups. LNU had lower blood loss (p = 0.031), need for transfusion (p = 0.013) and length of hospital stay (p <0.001), with similar operative time (p = 0.860).LNU was associated with better MFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.93, p = 0.033) and CSS (HR: 0.42, 95%CI 0.19-0.94, p = 0.036). Median time to cancer death was 41 months for LNU and 12 months for ONU (log-rank p = 0.029). BTFS was similar between groups (HR: 0.60, 95%CI 0.17-2.11, p = 0.427). On multivariable Cox regression model, surgical approach wasn't significantly associated with MFS (p = 0.202), CSS (p = 0.149) or BTFS (p = 0.586).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our cohort of advanced UTUC, LNU did not result in inferior oncological control compared to ONU. The minimally invasive approach conferred an advantage in perioperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/b8/CEJU-75-0103.PMC9628717.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy for locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a single-center cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Correia,&nbsp;Gonçalo Mendes,&nbsp;Bernardo Texeira,&nbsp;Mariana Madanelo,&nbsp;Avelino Fraga,&nbsp;Miguel Silva-Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.5173/ceju.2022.103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Open radical nephroureterectomy (ONU) is the standard of care for treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), but laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LNU) is increasingly being used due to better perioperative outcomes. However, its oncological safety remains controversial, in particular for advanced disease.We aimed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between surgical approaches in locally advanced UTUC (≥pT3 and/or pN+).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective analysis of all 48 patients submitted to radical nephroureterectomy for advanced UTUC between 2006 and 2020 in our center.Perioperative data were compared between groups. Bladder tumor-free survival (BTFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with log-rank p test. Multivariable Cox regression model was used to evaluate their association with surgical approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical and pathological characteristics were similar between groups. LNU had lower blood loss (p = 0.031), need for transfusion (p = 0.013) and length of hospital stay (p <0.001), with similar operative time (p = 0.860).LNU was associated with better MFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.93, p = 0.033) and CSS (HR: 0.42, 95%CI 0.19-0.94, p = 0.036). Median time to cancer death was 41 months for LNU and 12 months for ONU (log-rank p = 0.029). BTFS was similar between groups (HR: 0.60, 95%CI 0.17-2.11, p = 0.427). On multivariable Cox regression model, surgical approach wasn't significantly associated with MFS (p = 0.202), CSS (p = 0.149) or BTFS (p = 0.586).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our cohort of advanced UTUC, LNU did not result in inferior oncological control compared to ONU. The minimally invasive approach conferred an advantage in perioperative outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/b8/CEJU-75-0103.PMC9628717.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2022.103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2022.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

导读:开放式根治性肾输尿管切除术(ONU)是治疗上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的标准护理方法,但腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术(LNU)因其更好的围手术期疗效而越来越多地被采用。然而,其肿瘤安全性仍然存在争议,特别是对于晚期疾病。我们的目的是比较局部晚期UTUC(≥pT3和/或pN+)手术入路的围手术期和肿瘤预后。材料和方法:本研究回顾性分析了2006年至2020年在我中心接受根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗晚期UTUC的48例患者。比较两组围手术期资料。膀胱无肿瘤生存期(BTFS)、无转移生存期(MFS)和肿瘤特异性生存期(CSS)采用Kaplan-Meier曲线估计,并采用log-rank p检验进行比较。采用多变量Cox回归模型评价其与手术入路的关系。结果:两组临床及病理特征相似。LNU的失血量(p = 0.031)、输血需求(p = 0.013)和住院时间(p)较低。结论:在我们的晚期UTUC队列中,与ONU相比,LNU没有导致较差的肿瘤控制。微创入路在围手术期预后方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perioperative and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy for locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a single-center cohort study.

Introduction: Open radical nephroureterectomy (ONU) is the standard of care for treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), but laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LNU) is increasingly being used due to better perioperative outcomes. However, its oncological safety remains controversial, in particular for advanced disease.We aimed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between surgical approaches in locally advanced UTUC (≥pT3 and/or pN+).

Material and methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of all 48 patients submitted to radical nephroureterectomy for advanced UTUC between 2006 and 2020 in our center.Perioperative data were compared between groups. Bladder tumor-free survival (BTFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with log-rank p test. Multivariable Cox regression model was used to evaluate their association with surgical approach.

Results: Clinical and pathological characteristics were similar between groups. LNU had lower blood loss (p = 0.031), need for transfusion (p = 0.013) and length of hospital stay (p <0.001), with similar operative time (p = 0.860).LNU was associated with better MFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.93, p = 0.033) and CSS (HR: 0.42, 95%CI 0.19-0.94, p = 0.036). Median time to cancer death was 41 months for LNU and 12 months for ONU (log-rank p = 0.029). BTFS was similar between groups (HR: 0.60, 95%CI 0.17-2.11, p = 0.427). On multivariable Cox regression model, surgical approach wasn't significantly associated with MFS (p = 0.202), CSS (p = 0.149) or BTFS (p = 0.586).

Conclusions: In our cohort of advanced UTUC, LNU did not result in inferior oncological control compared to ONU. The minimally invasive approach conferred an advantage in perioperative outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Transperitoneal single-port robotic Firefly-guided bladder diverticulectomy and simple prostatectomy. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureterolithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy challenges in managing spinal cord neuropathy patients. Lessons learned from a scoping review. Robotic left nephrectomy with level IV inferior vena cava thrombectomy using the AngioVac system. Detrusor underactivity in symptomatic anterior pelvic organ prolapse. The role of gel-infused translabial ultrasound as a new modality in evaluation of female urethral stricture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1