Yuwinbir——这边走!超越土著知识和健康社会学之间的交汇点。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Sociology Review Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1080/14461242.2022.2091304
Megan Williams, Demelza Marlin
{"title":"Yuwinbir——这边走!超越土著知识和健康社会学之间的交汇点。","authors":"Megan Williams, Demelza Marlin","doi":"10.1080/14461242.2022.2091304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We acknowledge the Gadigal and Wangal people of the Eora Nation, Dabee people of the Wiradjuri Nation, and Wurundgeri Woi Wurrung and Bunurong Boon Wurrung peoples of the Kulin Nation, whose lands have supported the leadership of this Yuwinbir Special Issue of Health Sociology Review. We acknowledge their ancestors, spirits and knowledges, Elders of the past, and Elders of the present. We acknowledge Indigenous people who shaped each article and extend our thanks to their collaborators in exploring meeting points between health sociology and Indigenous knowledges. While ‘meeting points’ is the theme of this issue, we offer a critique of it in the editorial below. We respectfully use the Wiradjuri word ‘Yuwinbir’ to name this special issue, signalling ‘this way’ (Grant & Rudder, 2010) health sociology: this is the way Indigenous authors cited here say we must go. While our editorial names some distressing knowledge and research practice traps to dismantle along the way, it also outlines the way that conscious, critically reflective enquiry about self and sovereignty could transform relationships between Indigenous people and health sociology. The development of the Yuwinbir special issue grew from guest co-editor MeganWilliams’ experience as an associate editor of Health Sociology Review and related to Megan’s role as Chief Investigator of the Centre for Research Excellence – Strengthening systems for InDigenous health care Equity (CRE-STRIDE). CRE-STRIDE builds on 15 years of efforts from a large number of collaborators to improve the quality of health research particularly in partnership with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community controlled health organisations. CRE-STRIDE was established to address health inequity using Indigenous knowledges. It has Indigenous people’s leadership across multi-level project governance structures. An Indigenous Research Framework guides community engagement in research and research on wellbeing, health systems and service quality improvement processes. Relationality and relationships are central, with supportive project structures, and an ‘all teach, all learn’ capacity strengthening commitment that is continuous, reciprocal and reflexive (CRESTRIDE, 2020). The applied health research for health equity that CRE-STRIDE progresses has much to do with health sociology. Some CRE-STRIDE collaborators are trained in social sciences and sociology and for Megan this combines with training in Indigenous knowledges and public health. Belonging to Wiradjuri and palawa peoples and with Anglo-Celtic heritage, Megan’s work is multi-disciplinary across health and justice fields, focusing on the health of Aboriginal people in prison and reforms (Finlay, Williams, Sweet, McInerney, & Ward, 2016; Williams, 2021a). Co-editor Dr Demelza Marlin was trained in sociology and developed experience in health from her research on the intersections between culture, community, sports leadership and physical activity in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander contexts (Marlin, Apoifis, & Bennie, 2020). She has also investigated the relationship between wellbeing and everyday ritual and connections to place in non-Indigenous contexts (Game, Metcalfe, & Marlin,","PeriodicalId":46833,"journal":{"name":"Health Sociology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yuwinbir - this way! Going beyond meeting points between Indigenous knowledges and health sociology.\",\"authors\":\"Megan Williams, Demelza Marlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14461242.2022.2091304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We acknowledge the Gadigal and Wangal people of the Eora Nation, Dabee people of the Wiradjuri Nation, and Wurundgeri Woi Wurrung and Bunurong Boon Wurrung peoples of the Kulin Nation, whose lands have supported the leadership of this Yuwinbir Special Issue of Health Sociology Review. We acknowledge their ancestors, spirits and knowledges, Elders of the past, and Elders of the present. We acknowledge Indigenous people who shaped each article and extend our thanks to their collaborators in exploring meeting points between health sociology and Indigenous knowledges. While ‘meeting points’ is the theme of this issue, we offer a critique of it in the editorial below. We respectfully use the Wiradjuri word ‘Yuwinbir’ to name this special issue, signalling ‘this way’ (Grant & Rudder, 2010) health sociology: this is the way Indigenous authors cited here say we must go. While our editorial names some distressing knowledge and research practice traps to dismantle along the way, it also outlines the way that conscious, critically reflective enquiry about self and sovereignty could transform relationships between Indigenous people and health sociology. The development of the Yuwinbir special issue grew from guest co-editor MeganWilliams’ experience as an associate editor of Health Sociology Review and related to Megan’s role as Chief Investigator of the Centre for Research Excellence – Strengthening systems for InDigenous health care Equity (CRE-STRIDE). CRE-STRIDE builds on 15 years of efforts from a large number of collaborators to improve the quality of health research particularly in partnership with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community controlled health organisations. CRE-STRIDE was established to address health inequity using Indigenous knowledges. It has Indigenous people’s leadership across multi-level project governance structures. An Indigenous Research Framework guides community engagement in research and research on wellbeing, health systems and service quality improvement processes. Relationality and relationships are central, with supportive project structures, and an ‘all teach, all learn’ capacity strengthening commitment that is continuous, reciprocal and reflexive (CRESTRIDE, 2020). The applied health research for health equity that CRE-STRIDE progresses has much to do with health sociology. Some CRE-STRIDE collaborators are trained in social sciences and sociology and for Megan this combines with training in Indigenous knowledges and public health. Belonging to Wiradjuri and palawa peoples and with Anglo-Celtic heritage, Megan’s work is multi-disciplinary across health and justice fields, focusing on the health of Aboriginal people in prison and reforms (Finlay, Williams, Sweet, McInerney, & Ward, 2016; Williams, 2021a). Co-editor Dr Demelza Marlin was trained in sociology and developed experience in health from her research on the intersections between culture, community, sports leadership and physical activity in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander contexts (Marlin, Apoifis, & Bennie, 2020). She has also investigated the relationship between wellbeing and everyday ritual and connections to place in non-Indigenous contexts (Game, Metcalfe, & Marlin,\",\"PeriodicalId\":46833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Sociology Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Sociology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2022.2091304\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Sociology Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2022.2091304","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Yuwinbir - this way! Going beyond meeting points between Indigenous knowledges and health sociology.
We acknowledge the Gadigal and Wangal people of the Eora Nation, Dabee people of the Wiradjuri Nation, and Wurundgeri Woi Wurrung and Bunurong Boon Wurrung peoples of the Kulin Nation, whose lands have supported the leadership of this Yuwinbir Special Issue of Health Sociology Review. We acknowledge their ancestors, spirits and knowledges, Elders of the past, and Elders of the present. We acknowledge Indigenous people who shaped each article and extend our thanks to their collaborators in exploring meeting points between health sociology and Indigenous knowledges. While ‘meeting points’ is the theme of this issue, we offer a critique of it in the editorial below. We respectfully use the Wiradjuri word ‘Yuwinbir’ to name this special issue, signalling ‘this way’ (Grant & Rudder, 2010) health sociology: this is the way Indigenous authors cited here say we must go. While our editorial names some distressing knowledge and research practice traps to dismantle along the way, it also outlines the way that conscious, critically reflective enquiry about self and sovereignty could transform relationships between Indigenous people and health sociology. The development of the Yuwinbir special issue grew from guest co-editor MeganWilliams’ experience as an associate editor of Health Sociology Review and related to Megan’s role as Chief Investigator of the Centre for Research Excellence – Strengthening systems for InDigenous health care Equity (CRE-STRIDE). CRE-STRIDE builds on 15 years of efforts from a large number of collaborators to improve the quality of health research particularly in partnership with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community controlled health organisations. CRE-STRIDE was established to address health inequity using Indigenous knowledges. It has Indigenous people’s leadership across multi-level project governance structures. An Indigenous Research Framework guides community engagement in research and research on wellbeing, health systems and service quality improvement processes. Relationality and relationships are central, with supportive project structures, and an ‘all teach, all learn’ capacity strengthening commitment that is continuous, reciprocal and reflexive (CRESTRIDE, 2020). The applied health research for health equity that CRE-STRIDE progresses has much to do with health sociology. Some CRE-STRIDE collaborators are trained in social sciences and sociology and for Megan this combines with training in Indigenous knowledges and public health. Belonging to Wiradjuri and palawa peoples and with Anglo-Celtic heritage, Megan’s work is multi-disciplinary across health and justice fields, focusing on the health of Aboriginal people in prison and reforms (Finlay, Williams, Sweet, McInerney, & Ward, 2016; Williams, 2021a). Co-editor Dr Demelza Marlin was trained in sociology and developed experience in health from her research on the intersections between culture, community, sports leadership and physical activity in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander contexts (Marlin, Apoifis, & Bennie, 2020). She has also investigated the relationship between wellbeing and everyday ritual and connections to place in non-Indigenous contexts (Game, Metcalfe, & Marlin,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: An international, scholarly peer-reviewed journal, Health Sociology Review explores the contribution of sociology and sociological research methods to understanding health and illness; to health policy, promotion and practice; and to equity, social justice, social policy and social work. Health Sociology Review is published in association with The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) under the editorship of Eileen Willis. Health Sociology Review publishes original theoretical and research articles, literature reviews, special issues, symposia, commentaries and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Drug consumption stigma and patient legitimacy: experiences of people who use drugs seeking care for chronic non-cancer pain in Nigeria. Gut feelings and lived experiences: a qualitative study of 'anti-diet' dietitians' and psychologists' motivations and experiences regarding the weight-neutral approach. Shifting solutions: tracking transformations of drugs, health and the 'human' through human rights processes in Australia. Masculine enhancement as health or pathology: gender and optimisation discourses in health promotion materials on performance and image-enhancing drugs (PIEDs). The good pain patient: a critical evaluation of patients' self-presentations in specialist pain clinics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1