过敏反应是罕见的,由于冠状病毒在卫生保健工作者人群。

IF 1.6 Q3 ALLERGY Asia Pacific Allergy Pub Date : 2022-10-17 eCollection Date: 2022-10-01 DOI:10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e35
Betül Özdel Öztürk, İrem Akdemir, Alpay Azap, Gülfem Çelik, Sevim Bavbek, Dilşad Mungan
{"title":"过敏反应是罕见的,由于冠状病毒在卫生保健工作者人群。","authors":"Betül Özdel Öztürk,&nbsp;İrem Akdemir,&nbsp;Alpay Azap,&nbsp;Gülfem Çelik,&nbsp;Sevim Bavbek,&nbsp;Dilşad Mungan","doi":"10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CoronaVac, the first coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine administered in our country, was found safe in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to reveal the rate and features of CoronaVac vaccine-associated allergic reactions among vaccinated healthcare workers (HCWs) in real-life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was planned as a questionnaire-based study. Participants who reported a postvaccination allergic reaction were interviewed on phone and their medical records were also checked for confirmation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,488 HCWs took part in the study and 4,054 postvaccination complete questionnaire-responses were obtained. Twenty-one HCWs (female: male, 17:4) with a mean age of 40.95 ± 10.09 stated that they had an allergic reaction after a total of 23 vaccine injections. Accordingly, the reaction rate was 0.56% among all vaccine doses. The most common reactions were systemic skin reactions (2.7%) consisting of generalized pruritus, diffuse pruritic erythema, urticaria, and maculopapular rash. That was followed by local injection site reaction (0.12%). Anaphylaxis was reported in 4 cases (0.09%) with a mean onset time of 12 ± 6 minutes. One of them had a history of anaphylaxis with 2 drugs, another had venom and food allergy. Three of the subjects had level 2 diagnostic certainty according to the Brighton Collaboration criteria and one had level 3. All anaphylaxis cases were discharged within 24 hours and none of them required intensive care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated that allergic reactions to CoronaVac were rare and mostly mild. Although anaphylaxis was also rare, the importance of early intervention with close follow-up was once again emphasized.</p>","PeriodicalId":8488,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Allergy","volume":"12 4","pages":"e35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/65/b7/apa-12-e35.PMC9669466.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anaphylaxis is rare due to CoronaVac in a population of healthcare workers.\",\"authors\":\"Betül Özdel Öztürk,&nbsp;İrem Akdemir,&nbsp;Alpay Azap,&nbsp;Gülfem Çelik,&nbsp;Sevim Bavbek,&nbsp;Dilşad Mungan\",\"doi\":\"10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CoronaVac, the first coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine administered in our country, was found safe in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to reveal the rate and features of CoronaVac vaccine-associated allergic reactions among vaccinated healthcare workers (HCWs) in real-life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was planned as a questionnaire-based study. Participants who reported a postvaccination allergic reaction were interviewed on phone and their medical records were also checked for confirmation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,488 HCWs took part in the study and 4,054 postvaccination complete questionnaire-responses were obtained. Twenty-one HCWs (female: male, 17:4) with a mean age of 40.95 ± 10.09 stated that they had an allergic reaction after a total of 23 vaccine injections. Accordingly, the reaction rate was 0.56% among all vaccine doses. The most common reactions were systemic skin reactions (2.7%) consisting of generalized pruritus, diffuse pruritic erythema, urticaria, and maculopapular rash. That was followed by local injection site reaction (0.12%). Anaphylaxis was reported in 4 cases (0.09%) with a mean onset time of 12 ± 6 minutes. One of them had a history of anaphylaxis with 2 drugs, another had venom and food allergy. Three of the subjects had level 2 diagnostic certainty according to the Brighton Collaboration criteria and one had level 3. All anaphylaxis cases were discharged within 24 hours and none of them required intensive care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated that allergic reactions to CoronaVac were rare and mostly mild. Although anaphylaxis was also rare, the importance of early intervention with close follow-up was once again emphasized.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Allergy\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"e35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/65/b7/apa-12-e35.PMC9669466.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:我国首个2019冠状病毒病疫苗CoronaVac临床试验安全。目的:揭示现实生活中接种过冠状病毒疫苗的医护人员(HCWs)与冠状病毒疫苗相关的过敏反应的发生率和特点。方法:本研究采用问卷调查法。报告接种疫苗后过敏反应的参与者通过电话接受了采访,他们的医疗记录也被检查以确认。结果:共有2488名卫生保健员参与了研究,获得了4054份接种后完整的问卷。21名卫生保健员(女∶男,17:4)在共注射23次疫苗后出现过敏反应,平均年龄40.95±10.09岁。因此,所有疫苗剂量的反应率为0.56%。最常见的反应是全身皮肤反应(2.7%),包括全身性瘙痒、弥漫性瘙痒性红斑、荨麻疹和斑疹。其次为局部注射部位反应(0.12%)。过敏反应4例(0.09%),平均发病时间为12±6分钟。其中一人有2种药物过敏史,另一人有毒液和食物过敏史。根据布莱顿协作标准,3名受试者具有2级诊断确定性,1名具有3级诊断确定性。所有过敏反应病例均在24小时内出院,无一例需要重症监护。结论:我们的研究表明,对CoronaVac的过敏反应是罕见的,大多数是轻微的。虽然过敏反应也很少见,但再次强调了早期干预和密切随访的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anaphylaxis is rare due to CoronaVac in a population of healthcare workers.

Background: CoronaVac, the first coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine administered in our country, was found safe in clinical trials.

Objective: We aimed to reveal the rate and features of CoronaVac vaccine-associated allergic reactions among vaccinated healthcare workers (HCWs) in real-life.

Methods: This study was planned as a questionnaire-based study. Participants who reported a postvaccination allergic reaction were interviewed on phone and their medical records were also checked for confirmation.

Results: A total of 2,488 HCWs took part in the study and 4,054 postvaccination complete questionnaire-responses were obtained. Twenty-one HCWs (female: male, 17:4) with a mean age of 40.95 ± 10.09 stated that they had an allergic reaction after a total of 23 vaccine injections. Accordingly, the reaction rate was 0.56% among all vaccine doses. The most common reactions were systemic skin reactions (2.7%) consisting of generalized pruritus, diffuse pruritic erythema, urticaria, and maculopapular rash. That was followed by local injection site reaction (0.12%). Anaphylaxis was reported in 4 cases (0.09%) with a mean onset time of 12 ± 6 minutes. One of them had a history of anaphylaxis with 2 drugs, another had venom and food allergy. Three of the subjects had level 2 diagnostic certainty according to the Brighton Collaboration criteria and one had level 3. All anaphylaxis cases were discharged within 24 hours and none of them required intensive care.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that allergic reactions to CoronaVac were rare and mostly mild. Although anaphylaxis was also rare, the importance of early intervention with close follow-up was once again emphasized.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Asia Pacific Allergy (AP Allergy) is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (APAAACI). Although the primary aim of the journal is to promote communication between Asia Pacific scientists who are interested in allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology including immunodeficiency, the journal is intended to be available worldwide. To enable scientists and clinicians from emerging societies appreciate the scope and intent of the journal, early issues will contain more educational review material. For better communication and understanding, it will include rational concepts related to the diagnosis and management of asthma and other immunological conditions. Over time, the journal will increase the number of original research papers to become the foremost citation journal for allergy and clinical immunology information of the Asia Pacific in the future.
期刊最新文献
Philippine guidelines on the dietary primary prevention of allergic diseases in children. Stepping down of treatment in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A retrospective study comparing tapering vs abrupt discontinuation of antihistamines in patients having well-controlled disease. Tattoo-induced immunologic reaction to red inks. Evaluation of the protocol for rush subcutaneous immunotherapy with birch pollen extract. Identification and validation of autophagy-related genes and exploration of their relationship with disease severity in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1