{"title":"从身份政治到偏执风格:理查德·霍夫施塔特与历史心理学的陷阱。","authors":"Andrew McKenzie-McHarg","doi":"10.1353/jhi.2022.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The decade extending from the mid-1950s to the mid-1960s in the career of the American historian Richard Hofstadter (1916-70) was marked by a series of engagements with American right-wing politics. This article seeks to re-evaluate the evolution of Hofstadter's thinking over this decade, in part by drawing upon the recently discovered transcript of a BBC radio lecture that Hofstadter recorded in 1959 and that represents the first occasion on which he developed the notion of a \"paranoid style\" as a pattern of thought and action recurring through American political history.</p>","PeriodicalId":47274,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS","volume":"83 3","pages":"451-475"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Status Politics to the Paranoid Style: Richard Hofstadter and the Pitfalls of Psychologizing History.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew McKenzie-McHarg\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jhi.2022.0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The decade extending from the mid-1950s to the mid-1960s in the career of the American historian Richard Hofstadter (1916-70) was marked by a series of engagements with American right-wing politics. This article seeks to re-evaluate the evolution of Hofstadter's thinking over this decade, in part by drawing upon the recently discovered transcript of a BBC radio lecture that Hofstadter recorded in 1959 and that represents the first occasion on which he developed the notion of a \\\"paranoid style\\\" as a pattern of thought and action recurring through American political history.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS\",\"volume\":\"83 3\",\"pages\":\"451-475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2022.0022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2022.0022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
From Status Politics to the Paranoid Style: Richard Hofstadter and the Pitfalls of Psychologizing History.
The decade extending from the mid-1950s to the mid-1960s in the career of the American historian Richard Hofstadter (1916-70) was marked by a series of engagements with American right-wing politics. This article seeks to re-evaluate the evolution of Hofstadter's thinking over this decade, in part by drawing upon the recently discovered transcript of a BBC radio lecture that Hofstadter recorded in 1959 and that represents the first occasion on which he developed the notion of a "paranoid style" as a pattern of thought and action recurring through American political history.
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1940, the Journal of the History of Ideas has served as a medium for the publication of research in intellectual history that is of common interest to scholars and students in a wide range of fields. It is committed to encouraging diversity in regional coverage, chronological range, and methodological approaches. JHI defines intellectual history expansively and ecumenically, including the histories of philosophy, of literature and the arts, of the natural and social sciences, of religion, and of political thought. It also encourages scholarship at the intersections of cultural and intellectual history — for example, the history of the book and of visual culture.