在 NEAT 设计下的 Rasch IRT Equating 中使用 t 检验检测离群值。

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL Applied Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-06 DOI:10.1177/01466216221124045
Chunyan Liu, Daniel Jurich
{"title":"在 NEAT 设计下的 Rasch IRT Equating 中使用 t 检验检测离群值。","authors":"Chunyan Liu, Daniel Jurich","doi":"10.1177/01466216221124045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In equating practice, the existence of outliers in the anchor items may deteriorate the equating accuracy and threaten the validity of test scores. Therefore, stability of the anchor item performance should be evaluated before conducting equating. This study used simulation to investigate the performance of the <i>t</i>-test method in detecting outliers and compared its performance with other outlier detection methods, including the logit difference method with 0.5 and 0.3 as the cutoff values and the robust <i>z</i> statistic with 2.7 as the cutoff value. The investigated factors included sample size, proportion of outliers, item difficulty drift direction, and group difference. Across all simulated conditions, the <i>t</i>-test method outperformed the other methods in terms of sensitivity of flagging true outliers, bias of the estimated translation constant, and the root mean square error of examinee ability estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":48300,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychological Measurement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9679927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outlier Detection Using t-test in Rasch IRT Equating under NEAT Design.\",\"authors\":\"Chunyan Liu, Daniel Jurich\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01466216221124045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In equating practice, the existence of outliers in the anchor items may deteriorate the equating accuracy and threaten the validity of test scores. Therefore, stability of the anchor item performance should be evaluated before conducting equating. This study used simulation to investigate the performance of the <i>t</i>-test method in detecting outliers and compared its performance with other outlier detection methods, including the logit difference method with 0.5 and 0.3 as the cutoff values and the robust <i>z</i> statistic with 2.7 as the cutoff value. The investigated factors included sample size, proportion of outliers, item difficulty drift direction, and group difference. Across all simulated conditions, the <i>t</i>-test method outperformed the other methods in terms of sensitivity of flagging true outliers, bias of the estimated translation constant, and the root mean square error of examinee ability estimates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Psychological Measurement\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9679927/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Psychological Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216221124045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216221124045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在等分实践中,如果锚定项目中存在异常值,可能会降低等分的准确性,并威胁到测验分数的效度。因此,在进行等分前,应评估锚点项目成绩的稳定性。本研究采用模拟方法研究了 t 检验法在检测离群值方面的性能,并将其与其他离群值检测方法进行了比较,包括以 0.5 和 0.3 为临界值的对数差分法和以 2.7 为临界值的稳健 z 统计法。调查因素包括样本量、异常值比例、项目难度漂移方向和组间差异。在所有模拟条件下,t 检验法在标记真实离群值的灵敏度、估计平移常数的偏差和考生能力估计的均方根误差方面均优于其他方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outlier Detection Using t-test in Rasch IRT Equating under NEAT Design.

In equating practice, the existence of outliers in the anchor items may deteriorate the equating accuracy and threaten the validity of test scores. Therefore, stability of the anchor item performance should be evaluated before conducting equating. This study used simulation to investigate the performance of the t-test method in detecting outliers and compared its performance with other outlier detection methods, including the logit difference method with 0.5 and 0.3 as the cutoff values and the robust z statistic with 2.7 as the cutoff value. The investigated factors included sample size, proportion of outliers, item difficulty drift direction, and group difference. Across all simulated conditions, the t-test method outperformed the other methods in terms of sensitivity of flagging true outliers, bias of the estimated translation constant, and the root mean square error of examinee ability estimates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Applied Psychological Measurement publishes empirical research on the application of techniques of psychological measurement to substantive problems in all areas of psychology and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Differential Item Functioning on Computer Adaptive Testing Under Different Conditions. Evaluating the Construct Validity of Instructional Manipulation Checks as Measures of Careless Responding to Surveys. A Mark-Recapture Approach to Estimating Item Pool Compromise. Estimating Test-Retest Reliability in the Presence of Self-Selection Bias and Learning/Practice Effects. The Improved EMS Algorithm for Latent Variable Selection in M3PL Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1