布地奈德雾化与安慰剂治疗成人哮喘一项双盲随机安慰剂对照临床试验。

Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2018-12-28 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.112
Hojat Sheikh-Motahar-Vahedi, Maryam Habibi-Samadi, Elnaz Vahidi, Morteza Saeedi, Mehdi Momeni
{"title":"布地奈德雾化与安慰剂治疗成人哮喘一项双盲随机安慰剂对照临床试验。","authors":"Hojat Sheikh-Motahar-Vahedi,&nbsp;Maryam Habibi-Samadi,&nbsp;Elnaz Vahidi,&nbsp;Morteza Saeedi,&nbsp;Mehdi Momeni","doi":"10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Asthma is one of acute respiratory diseases leading to emergency department (ED) referral. Management of acute attack plays an important role in its outcome.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This trial was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of nebulized budesonide versus placebo in moderate to severe acute asthma attack in adults in the ED.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this clinical trial, we enrolled patients with acute exacerbation of asthma and standard treatment of acute asthma attack was administered to all of them. 41 patients in our study were randomly entered into 2 groups. In one group, we prescribed nebulized budesonide and in the other group nebulized placebo (normal saline) was administered. Patients' demographic data, vital signs, symptoms' acuity and the time of symptom relief, patient and physician satisfaction were all recorded and compared between the 2 groups. All cases were followed and disease outcome, readmission, mortality and morbidity rates were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 20 patients were entered the budesonide group and 19 patients were enrolled in the placebo group. The mean age ranges were 55.70±15.30 and 60.32±18.41 years old respectively. Heart rate, respiratory rate and O2 saturation in the first group were improved significantly after the treatment in comparison to the second group (p<0.05). The mean time of recovery and length of hospital stay were better in the first group than the second group but this difference was not significant (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of nebulized budesonide to standard asthma treatment might result in more improvement in O2 saturation and less patient's distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":7290,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.112","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nebulized Budesonide vs. Placebo in Adults with Asthma Attack; a Double Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hojat Sheikh-Motahar-Vahedi,&nbsp;Maryam Habibi-Samadi,&nbsp;Elnaz Vahidi,&nbsp;Morteza Saeedi,&nbsp;Mehdi Momeni\",\"doi\":\"10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Asthma is one of acute respiratory diseases leading to emergency department (ED) referral. Management of acute attack plays an important role in its outcome.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This trial was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of nebulized budesonide versus placebo in moderate to severe acute asthma attack in adults in the ED.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this clinical trial, we enrolled patients with acute exacerbation of asthma and standard treatment of acute asthma attack was administered to all of them. 41 patients in our study were randomly entered into 2 groups. In one group, we prescribed nebulized budesonide and in the other group nebulized placebo (normal saline) was administered. Patients' demographic data, vital signs, symptoms' acuity and the time of symptom relief, patient and physician satisfaction were all recorded and compared between the 2 groups. All cases were followed and disease outcome, readmission, mortality and morbidity rates were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 20 patients were entered the budesonide group and 19 patients were enrolled in the placebo group. The mean age ranges were 55.70±15.30 and 60.32±18.41 years old respectively. Heart rate, respiratory rate and O2 saturation in the first group were improved significantly after the treatment in comparison to the second group (p<0.05). The mean time of recovery and length of hospital stay were better in the first group than the second group but this difference was not significant (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of nebulized budesonide to standard asthma treatment might result in more improvement in O2 saturation and less patient's distress.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.112\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:哮喘是急诊科(ED)转诊的急性呼吸系统疾病之一。急性发作的管理在其预后中起着重要作用。目的:本试验旨在评价布地奈德雾化与安慰剂在ed成人中重度急性哮喘发作中的疗效。方法:在本临床试验中,我们招募了哮喘急性加重患者,并对所有患者进行急性哮喘发作的标准治疗。我们将41例患者随机分为两组。一组给予布地奈德雾化治疗,另一组给予安慰剂(生理盐水)雾化治疗。记录两组患者的人口学资料、生命体征、症状的严重程度、症状缓解时间、患者满意度和医师满意度进行比较。对所有病例进行随访,记录疾病结局、再入院、死亡率和发病率。结果:本研究纳入布地奈德组20例,安慰剂组19例。平均年龄分别为55.70±15.30岁和60.32±18.41岁。治疗后,第一组患者心率、呼吸频率、血氧饱和度较第二组明显改善(p0.05)。结论:在标准哮喘治疗中加入布地奈德雾化治疗可明显改善血氧饱和度,减轻患者的痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nebulized Budesonide vs. Placebo in Adults with Asthma Attack; a Double Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Introduction: Asthma is one of acute respiratory diseases leading to emergency department (ED) referral. Management of acute attack plays an important role in its outcome.

Objective: This trial was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of nebulized budesonide versus placebo in moderate to severe acute asthma attack in adults in the ED.

Method: In this clinical trial, we enrolled patients with acute exacerbation of asthma and standard treatment of acute asthma attack was administered to all of them. 41 patients in our study were randomly entered into 2 groups. In one group, we prescribed nebulized budesonide and in the other group nebulized placebo (normal saline) was administered. Patients' demographic data, vital signs, symptoms' acuity and the time of symptom relief, patient and physician satisfaction were all recorded and compared between the 2 groups. All cases were followed and disease outcome, readmission, mortality and morbidity rates were documented.

Results: In this study, 20 patients were entered the budesonide group and 19 patients were enrolled in the placebo group. The mean age ranges were 55.70±15.30 and 60.32±18.41 years old respectively. Heart rate, respiratory rate and O2 saturation in the first group were improved significantly after the treatment in comparison to the second group (p<0.05). The mean time of recovery and length of hospital stay were better in the first group than the second group but this difference was not significant (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The addition of nebulized budesonide to standard asthma treatment might result in more improvement in O2 saturation and less patient's distress.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Ramadan on Emergency Department Patients Flow; a Cross-Sectional Study in UAE. Sample Size Calculation Guide - Part 7: How to Calculate the Sample Size Based on a Correlation. Generalist versus Abdominal Subspecialist Radiologist Interpretations of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Performed on Patients with Abdominal Pain and its Impact on the Therapeutic Approach. Development and Implementation of Integrated Road Traffic Injuries Surveillance - India (IRIS-India): A Protocol. A Letter on "The Current Status of Genes and Genetic Testing in Emergency Medicine: A Narrative Review".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1