急诊科消化道出血患者管理实施标准临床操作指南的效果;一项横断面研究。

Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2018-10-01 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.97
Farhad Heydari, Nasim Golestani, Mehrdad Esmailian
{"title":"急诊科消化道出血患者管理实施标准临床操作指南的效果;一项横断面研究。","authors":"Farhad Heydari,&nbsp;Nasim Golestani,&nbsp;Mehrdad Esmailian","doi":"10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A clinical practice guideline (CPG) is developed with the aim of improving the quality of health care and reducing unnecessary interventions, hospitalization time, and related costs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study attempted to design a standard protocol for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study conducted during 2013 and 2014 in an educational medical center in Isfahan, Iran. A checklist containing questions about waiting time for the services, hospitalization time, and costs was completed for the GIB patients. After this primary data gathering, a CPG was designed, codified, underwent several revisions, and finally implemented. Thereafter, the checklist was completed by GIB patients and compared with the previous ones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients in each of the two phases were included. The mean age and sex of the studied patients were not different.The time from emergency departments (ED) arrival until the first visit (14 ± 9.8 Vs. 19.4 ± 13.4 minutes; p = 0.03), hospitalization (73.7 ± 49.2 Vs. 116.2 ± 7.2 hours; p=0.003) and costs (1.3 ± 0.81 Vs. 3.68 ± 3.51 million rials; p < 0.001) were significantly reduced following the CPG implementation. The time from admission until conducting endoscopy was not different in the two study periods (16.5 ± 7.8 Vs. 23.9 ± 24.5 hours, p = 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>\n <b>The implementation of the CPG for the management of GIB patients in the ED resulted in a reduction in the waiting time for the services and, further, reduction of hospitalization time and related costs.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":7290,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"2 4","pages":"e42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/d0/AJEM-2-e42.PMC6548148.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Implementation of Standard Clinical Practice Guideline on Management of Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients in Emergency Department; a Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Farhad Heydari,&nbsp;Nasim Golestani,&nbsp;Mehrdad Esmailian\",\"doi\":\"10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.97\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A clinical practice guideline (CPG) is developed with the aim of improving the quality of health care and reducing unnecessary interventions, hospitalization time, and related costs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study attempted to design a standard protocol for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study conducted during 2013 and 2014 in an educational medical center in Isfahan, Iran. A checklist containing questions about waiting time for the services, hospitalization time, and costs was completed for the GIB patients. After this primary data gathering, a CPG was designed, codified, underwent several revisions, and finally implemented. Thereafter, the checklist was completed by GIB patients and compared with the previous ones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients in each of the two phases were included. The mean age and sex of the studied patients were not different.The time from emergency departments (ED) arrival until the first visit (14 ± 9.8 Vs. 19.4 ± 13.4 minutes; p = 0.03), hospitalization (73.7 ± 49.2 Vs. 116.2 ± 7.2 hours; p=0.003) and costs (1.3 ± 0.81 Vs. 3.68 ± 3.51 million rials; p < 0.001) were significantly reduced following the CPG implementation. The time from admission until conducting endoscopy was not different in the two study periods (16.5 ± 7.8 Vs. 23.9 ± 24.5 hours, p = 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>\\n <b>The implementation of the CPG for the management of GIB patients in the ED resulted in a reduction in the waiting time for the services and, further, reduction of hospitalization time and related costs.</b>\\n </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"e42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/d0/AJEM-2-e42.PMC6548148.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.97\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:制定了一项临床实践指南(CPG),旨在提高医疗保健质量,减少不必要的干预措施、住院时间和相关成本。目的:本研究试图设计一个胃肠道出血(GIB)患者的标准方案。方法:这是一项2013年和2014年在伊朗伊斯法罕一家教育医疗中心进行的横断面研究。为GIB患者填写了一份清单,其中包含有关服务等待时间、住院时间和费用的问题。在这一主要数据收集之后,CPG被设计、编纂、经历了几次修订,并最终实施。之后,GIB患者完成检查表,并与之前的检查表进行比较。结果:两个阶段各有50名患者。研究患者的平均年龄和性别没有差异。CPG实施后,从急诊科(ED)到第一次就诊的时间(14±9.8 Vs.19.4±13.4分钟;p=0.03)、住院时间(73.7±49.2 Vs.116.2±7.2小时;p=0.003)和费用(1.3±0.81 Vs.368±351万里亚尔;p<0.001)显著减少。在两个研究期间,从入院到进行内窥镜检查的时间没有差异(16.5±7.8 Vs.23.9±24.5小时,p=0.89)。结论:实施CPG管理ED中的GIB患者,减少了服务的等待时间,进一步减少了住院时间和相关费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Implementation of Standard Clinical Practice Guideline on Management of Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients in Emergency Department; a Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction: A clinical practice guideline (CPG) is developed with the aim of improving the quality of health care and reducing unnecessary interventions, hospitalization time, and related costs.

Objective: This study attempted to design a standard protocol for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) patients.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted during 2013 and 2014 in an educational medical center in Isfahan, Iran. A checklist containing questions about waiting time for the services, hospitalization time, and costs was completed for the GIB patients. After this primary data gathering, a CPG was designed, codified, underwent several revisions, and finally implemented. Thereafter, the checklist was completed by GIB patients and compared with the previous ones.

Results: Fifty patients in each of the two phases were included. The mean age and sex of the studied patients were not different.The time from emergency departments (ED) arrival until the first visit (14 ± 9.8 Vs. 19.4 ± 13.4 minutes; p = 0.03), hospitalization (73.7 ± 49.2 Vs. 116.2 ± 7.2 hours; p=0.003) and costs (1.3 ± 0.81 Vs. 3.68 ± 3.51 million rials; p < 0.001) were significantly reduced following the CPG implementation. The time from admission until conducting endoscopy was not different in the two study periods (16.5 ± 7.8 Vs. 23.9 ± 24.5 hours, p = 0.89).

Conclusion: The implementation of the CPG for the management of GIB patients in the ED resulted in a reduction in the waiting time for the services and, further, reduction of hospitalization time and related costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Ramadan on Emergency Department Patients Flow; a Cross-Sectional Study in UAE. Sample Size Calculation Guide - Part 7: How to Calculate the Sample Size Based on a Correlation. Generalist versus Abdominal Subspecialist Radiologist Interpretations of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Performed on Patients with Abdominal Pain and its Impact on the Therapeutic Approach. Development and Implementation of Integrated Road Traffic Injuries Surveillance - India (IRIS-India): A Protocol. A Letter on "The Current Status of Genes and Genetic Testing in Emergency Medicine: A Narrative Review".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1