Dong Wook Kim, Ji Hyun Kim, Sang Kun Lee, Sang Ahm Lee, Ji Woong Lee, Min Young Kim, Dae-Won Seo
{"title":"在FAME研究中,Perampanel作为局灶性癫痫患者的第一辅助治疗:剂量相关疗效、安全性和与反应相关的临床因素的事后分析","authors":"Dong Wook Kim, Ji Hyun Kim, Sang Kun Lee, Sang Ahm Lee, Ji Woong Lee, Min Young Kim, Dae-Won Seo","doi":"10.14581/jer.22002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Perampanel is approved for the adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures (FOS) with or without secondary generalized seizures. The FAME (Fycompa<sup>®</sup> as first Add-on to Monotherapy in patients with Epilepsy; NCT02726074) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of perampanel added to monotherapy in patients with FOS with or without secondary generalized seizures (SGS). <i>Post hoc</i> analyses of the FAME study assessed potential predictors of response and an in-depth evaluation of the safety and efficacy of perampanel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Efficacy was assessed by reduction of total seizure frequency by ≥50%, ≥75% or 100%, and safety by incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs leading to discontinuation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for treatment response were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients (82/85) received perampanel doses of 4-8 mg/day during maintenance therapy and the highest efficacy rates were achieved with 4 mg/day, irrespective of efficacy outcome. Doses of 4 or 6 mg/day in patients with FOS with SGS (n=16) produced comparable efficacy outcomes. In multivariate analysis, total perampanel dose was predictive of 50% and 75% response rates; longer total perampanel administration period with 50% response; and concomitant non-anti-seizure medication with a 100% response. Patients developed a TEAE more frequently during the 12-week titration period (60.2%) than the 24-week maintenance period (28.4%), including dizziness (45.5% vs. 9.1%), somnolence (10.2% vs. 0%), and headache (4.5% vs. 3.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><i>Post hoc</i> analyses show that even low doses of perampanel may be effective and TEAEs are usually self-limited or well-tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":73741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epilepsy research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/17/97/jer-22002.PMC9289380.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perampanel as First Adjunctive Treatment in Patients with Focal-Onset Seizures in the FAME Study: <i>Post hoc</i> Analyses of Dose-Related Efficacy, Safety and Clinical Factors Associated with Response.\",\"authors\":\"Dong Wook Kim, Ji Hyun Kim, Sang Kun Lee, Sang Ahm Lee, Ji Woong Lee, Min Young Kim, Dae-Won Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.14581/jer.22002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Perampanel is approved for the adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures (FOS) with or without secondary generalized seizures. The FAME (Fycompa<sup>®</sup> as first Add-on to Monotherapy in patients with Epilepsy; NCT02726074) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of perampanel added to monotherapy in patients with FOS with or without secondary generalized seizures (SGS). <i>Post hoc</i> analyses of the FAME study assessed potential predictors of response and an in-depth evaluation of the safety and efficacy of perampanel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Efficacy was assessed by reduction of total seizure frequency by ≥50%, ≥75% or 100%, and safety by incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs leading to discontinuation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for treatment response were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients (82/85) received perampanel doses of 4-8 mg/day during maintenance therapy and the highest efficacy rates were achieved with 4 mg/day, irrespective of efficacy outcome. Doses of 4 or 6 mg/day in patients with FOS with SGS (n=16) produced comparable efficacy outcomes. In multivariate analysis, total perampanel dose was predictive of 50% and 75% response rates; longer total perampanel administration period with 50% response; and concomitant non-anti-seizure medication with a 100% response. Patients developed a TEAE more frequently during the 12-week titration period (60.2%) than the 24-week maintenance period (28.4%), including dizziness (45.5% vs. 9.1%), somnolence (10.2% vs. 0%), and headache (4.5% vs. 3.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><i>Post hoc</i> analyses show that even low doses of perampanel may be effective and TEAEs are usually self-limited or well-tolerated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of epilepsy research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/17/97/jer-22002.PMC9289380.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of epilepsy research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.22002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epilepsy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.22002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:Perampanel被批准用于伴或不伴继发性全面性癫痫发作的局灶性癫痫发作(FOS)的辅助治疗。FAME (Fycompa®)作为癫痫患者单药治疗的首个附加药物;NCT02726074)研究评估了perampanel加入单药治疗伴有或不伴有继发性全面性癫痫发作(SGS)的FOS患者的疗效和安全性。FAME研究的事后分析评估了反应的潜在预测因素,并对perampanel的安全性和有效性进行了深入评估。方法:通过总发作频率降低≥50%、≥75%或100%来评估疗效,通过治疗中出现的不良事件(teae)和导致停药的teae发生率来评估安全性。对治疗反应进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析。结果:大多数患者(82/85)在维持治疗期间接受了4- 8mg /天的perampanel剂量,无论疗效结果如何,4mg /天的疗效最高。在伴有SGS的FOS患者(n=16)中,4或6mg /天的剂量产生了相当的疗效结果。在多变量分析中,perampanel总剂量可预测50%和75%的有效率;总给药时间更长,有效率50%;同时服用非抗癫痫药物,100%有效。患者在12周滴定期(60.2%)比24周维持期(28.4%)发生TEAE的频率更高,包括头晕(45.5% vs. 9.1%)、嗜睡(10.2% vs. 0%)和头痛(4.5% vs. 3.4%)。结论:事后分析表明,即使是低剂量的perampanel也可能有效,teae通常是自限性或耐受性良好的。
Perampanel as First Adjunctive Treatment in Patients with Focal-Onset Seizures in the FAME Study: Post hoc Analyses of Dose-Related Efficacy, Safety and Clinical Factors Associated with Response.
Background and purpose: Perampanel is approved for the adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures (FOS) with or without secondary generalized seizures. The FAME (Fycompa® as first Add-on to Monotherapy in patients with Epilepsy; NCT02726074) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of perampanel added to monotherapy in patients with FOS with or without secondary generalized seizures (SGS). Post hoc analyses of the FAME study assessed potential predictors of response and an in-depth evaluation of the safety and efficacy of perampanel.
Methods: Efficacy was assessed by reduction of total seizure frequency by ≥50%, ≥75% or 100%, and safety by incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs leading to discontinuation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for treatment response were performed.
Results: Most patients (82/85) received perampanel doses of 4-8 mg/day during maintenance therapy and the highest efficacy rates were achieved with 4 mg/day, irrespective of efficacy outcome. Doses of 4 or 6 mg/day in patients with FOS with SGS (n=16) produced comparable efficacy outcomes. In multivariate analysis, total perampanel dose was predictive of 50% and 75% response rates; longer total perampanel administration period with 50% response; and concomitant non-anti-seizure medication with a 100% response. Patients developed a TEAE more frequently during the 12-week titration period (60.2%) than the 24-week maintenance period (28.4%), including dizziness (45.5% vs. 9.1%), somnolence (10.2% vs. 0%), and headache (4.5% vs. 3.4%).
Conclusions: Post hoc analyses show that even low doses of perampanel may be effective and TEAEs are usually self-limited or well-tolerated.