构建南非护生感知压力量表的效度和信度。

Q2 Medicine Curationis Pub Date : 2022-06-06 DOI:10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2276
Michelle C Engelbrecht
{"title":"构建南非护生感知压力量表的效度和信度。","authors":"Michelle C Engelbrecht","doi":"10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Increased levels of stress in nursing students are negatively related to caring behaviours and also result in poorer job proficiency and nurses who are more inclined to leave the profession. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), developed by Sheu and colleagues, is one of the most cited instruments for measuring stress and sources of stress amongst nursing students in international studies. However, it has not been widely validated for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This research aimed to test the construct validity and reliability of the PSS for South African nursing students.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> A cross-sectional survey was conducted at a Central South African University, and 471 of the 685 registered nursing students (68.8% response rate) participated in the study. Questionnaires were distributed and collected during classes. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to test the hypothesised six-factor latent structure and determine the construct validity of the PSS. The internal consistency of the PSS was measured using Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The model fit was a good fit and supported the six-factor latent structure as stress from (1) taking care of patients, (2) teachers and nursing staff, (3) assignments and workload, (4) peers and daily life, (5) lack of professional knowledge and skills and (6) clinical environment. Overall the PSS had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.93.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The results confirm the construct validity and the internal consistency of the PSS for South African nursing students.</p>","PeriodicalId":35715,"journal":{"name":"Curationis","volume":" ","pages":"e1-e7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257834/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construct validity and reliability of the perceived stress scale for nursing students in South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle C Engelbrecht\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Increased levels of stress in nursing students are negatively related to caring behaviours and also result in poorer job proficiency and nurses who are more inclined to leave the profession. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), developed by Sheu and colleagues, is one of the most cited instruments for measuring stress and sources of stress amongst nursing students in international studies. However, it has not been widely validated for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This research aimed to test the construct validity and reliability of the PSS for South African nursing students.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> A cross-sectional survey was conducted at a Central South African University, and 471 of the 685 registered nursing students (68.8% response rate) participated in the study. Questionnaires were distributed and collected during classes. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to test the hypothesised six-factor latent structure and determine the construct validity of the PSS. The internal consistency of the PSS was measured using Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The model fit was a good fit and supported the six-factor latent structure as stress from (1) taking care of patients, (2) teachers and nursing staff, (3) assignments and workload, (4) peers and daily life, (5) lack of professional knowledge and skills and (6) clinical environment. Overall the PSS had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.93.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The results confirm the construct validity and the internal consistency of the PSS for South African nursing students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curationis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1-e7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9257834/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curationis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curationis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:护理专业学生压力水平的增加与护理行为呈负相关,也导致工作熟练程度较低,护士更倾向于离开该专业。感知压力量表(PSS)是由Sheu及其同事开发的,是国际研究护理专业学生中最常被引用的测量压力和压力来源的工具之一。然而,它还没有被广泛地用于这一目的。目的:本研究旨在检验南非护生PSS的结构效度和信度。方法:在南非中部一所大学进行横断面调查,685名注册护理专业学生中有471人参与研究,回复率为68.8%。在课堂上发放和收集问卷。验证性因子分析检验了假设的六因素潜在结构,并确定了PSS的结构效度。采用Cronbach’s alpha测量PSS的内部一致性。结果:模型拟合良好,支持六因素潜在结构,即(1)照顾患者压力、(2)教师和护理人员压力、(3)作业和工作量压力、(4)同伴和日常生活压力、(5)缺乏专业知识和技能压力、(6)临床环境压力。总体而言,PSS的Cronbach's alpha为0.93。结论:结果证实了南非护生PSS的结构效度和内部一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Construct validity and reliability of the perceived stress scale for nursing students in South Africa.

Background:  Increased levels of stress in nursing students are negatively related to caring behaviours and also result in poorer job proficiency and nurses who are more inclined to leave the profession. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), developed by Sheu and colleagues, is one of the most cited instruments for measuring stress and sources of stress amongst nursing students in international studies. However, it has not been widely validated for this purpose.

Objectives:  This research aimed to test the construct validity and reliability of the PSS for South African nursing students.

Method:  A cross-sectional survey was conducted at a Central South African University, and 471 of the 685 registered nursing students (68.8% response rate) participated in the study. Questionnaires were distributed and collected during classes. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to test the hypothesised six-factor latent structure and determine the construct validity of the PSS. The internal consistency of the PSS was measured using Cronbach's alpha.

Results:  The model fit was a good fit and supported the six-factor latent structure as stress from (1) taking care of patients, (2) teachers and nursing staff, (3) assignments and workload, (4) peers and daily life, (5) lack of professional knowledge and skills and (6) clinical environment. Overall the PSS had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.93.

Conclusion:  The results confirm the construct validity and the internal consistency of the PSS for South African nursing students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Curationis
Curationis Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Identity work of public hospital nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa Midwifery hurdles: Navigating tuberculosis screening challenges in South Africa Newly qualified professional nurses' experiences providing postoperative care to children in CTICU. Nurses' practices in stroke-related dysphagia in low- and middle-income countries. Guidelines to support newly qualified professional nurses for effective clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1