Dongyan Xu, Thriveen S C Mana, Jennifer L Cadnum, Abhishek Deshpande, Faezeh Afsari, Naseer Sangwan, Curtis J Donskey
{"title":"为什么强力霉素促进艰难梭菌感染的风险相对较低?","authors":"Dongyan Xu, Thriveen S C Mana, Jennifer L Cadnum, Abhishek Deshpande, Faezeh Afsari, Naseer Sangwan, Curtis J Donskey","doi":"10.20411/pai.v7i1.512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical studies suggest that doxycycline poses a low risk for promotion of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection, but the microbiologic explanation for this finding is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mice treated with oral doxycycline, oral azithromycin, subcutaneous ceftriaxone, doxycycline plus ceftriaxone, or azithromycin plus ceftriaxone were challenged with 10<sup>4</sup> colony-forming units of 2 different <i>C. difficile</i> strains on day 2 of 5 of treatment. The concentration of <i>C. difficile</i> was measured in stool 2 and 5 days after challenge. The impact of the treatments on the microbiota was assessed by sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Doxycycline and azithromycin treatment did not promote colonization by either <i>C. difficile</i> strain in comparison to saline controls. Doxycycline treatment significantly reduced ceftriaxone-induced overgrowth of a <i>C. difficile</i> strain with doxycycline minimum-inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.06 µg/mL (<i>P</i><0.01) but not a strain with doxycycline MIC of 48 µg/mL (<i>P</i>>0.05); azithromycin treatment did not reduce ceftriaxone-induced overgrowth of either strain. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing revealed significantly lower bacterial diversity in the stool of ceftriaxone-treated mice, in comparison to doxycycline-treated and azithromycin-treated mice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that doxycycline may have a low propensity to promote <i>C. difficile</i> colonization because it causes relatively limited alteration of the indigenous microbiota that provide colonization resistance and because it provides inhibitory activity against some <i>C. difficile</i> strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":36419,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens and Immunity","volume":" ","pages":"81-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9254868/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Does Doxycycline Pose a Relatively Low Risk for Promotion of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection?\",\"authors\":\"Dongyan Xu, Thriveen S C Mana, Jennifer L Cadnum, Abhishek Deshpande, Faezeh Afsari, Naseer Sangwan, Curtis J Donskey\",\"doi\":\"10.20411/pai.v7i1.512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical studies suggest that doxycycline poses a low risk for promotion of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection, but the microbiologic explanation for this finding is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mice treated with oral doxycycline, oral azithromycin, subcutaneous ceftriaxone, doxycycline plus ceftriaxone, or azithromycin plus ceftriaxone were challenged with 10<sup>4</sup> colony-forming units of 2 different <i>C. difficile</i> strains on day 2 of 5 of treatment. The concentration of <i>C. difficile</i> was measured in stool 2 and 5 days after challenge. The impact of the treatments on the microbiota was assessed by sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Doxycycline and azithromycin treatment did not promote colonization by either <i>C. difficile</i> strain in comparison to saline controls. Doxycycline treatment significantly reduced ceftriaxone-induced overgrowth of a <i>C. difficile</i> strain with doxycycline minimum-inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.06 µg/mL (<i>P</i><0.01) but not a strain with doxycycline MIC of 48 µg/mL (<i>P</i>>0.05); azithromycin treatment did not reduce ceftriaxone-induced overgrowth of either strain. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing revealed significantly lower bacterial diversity in the stool of ceftriaxone-treated mice, in comparison to doxycycline-treated and azithromycin-treated mice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that doxycycline may have a low propensity to promote <i>C. difficile</i> colonization because it causes relatively limited alteration of the indigenous microbiota that provide colonization resistance and because it provides inhibitory activity against some <i>C. difficile</i> strains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathogens and Immunity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"81-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9254868/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathogens and Immunity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20411/pai.v7i1.512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20411/pai.v7i1.512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Why Does Doxycycline Pose a Relatively Low Risk for Promotion of Clostridioides difficile Infection?
Background: Clinical studies suggest that doxycycline poses a low risk for promotion of Clostridioides difficile infection, but the microbiologic explanation for this finding is unclear.
Methods: Mice treated with oral doxycycline, oral azithromycin, subcutaneous ceftriaxone, doxycycline plus ceftriaxone, or azithromycin plus ceftriaxone were challenged with 104 colony-forming units of 2 different C. difficile strains on day 2 of 5 of treatment. The concentration of C. difficile was measured in stool 2 and 5 days after challenge. The impact of the treatments on the microbiota was assessed by sequencing.
Results: Doxycycline and azithromycin treatment did not promote colonization by either C. difficile strain in comparison to saline controls. Doxycycline treatment significantly reduced ceftriaxone-induced overgrowth of a C. difficile strain with doxycycline minimum-inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.06 µg/mL (P<0.01) but not a strain with doxycycline MIC of 48 µg/mL (P>0.05); azithromycin treatment did not reduce ceftriaxone-induced overgrowth of either strain. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing revealed significantly lower bacterial diversity in the stool of ceftriaxone-treated mice, in comparison to doxycycline-treated and azithromycin-treated mice.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that doxycycline may have a low propensity to promote C. difficile colonization because it causes relatively limited alteration of the indigenous microbiota that provide colonization resistance and because it provides inhibitory activity against some C. difficile strains.