新加坡一个为期5年的社区项目,旨在防止认知能力下降

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry Pub Date : 2022-08-03 DOI:10.1111/appy.12518
Ted Kheng Siang Ng, Lei Feng, Ru Yuan Chua, Lee Gan Goh, Ee Heok Kua, Rathi Mahendran
{"title":"新加坡一个为期5年的社区项目,旨在防止认知能力下降","authors":"Ted Kheng Siang Ng,&nbsp;Lei Feng,&nbsp;Ru Yuan Chua,&nbsp;Lee Gan Goh,&nbsp;Ee Heok Kua,&nbsp;Rathi Mahendran","doi":"10.1111/appy.12518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>There is a scarcity of naturalistic follow-up studies on cognitive stimulating activities (CSAs), particularly in a real-world setting and over long-term. We thus investigated a pooled novel CSA intervention to prevent cognitive decline amongst community-dwelling older adults without dementia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Nested within a community-based longitudinal follow-up cohort study of community-dwelling and multi-ethnic older adults (<i>N</i> = 991), a subset of the cohort (<i>n</i> = 264) underwent four single-blinded randomized controlled trials involving four novel CSAs, including mindfulness, horticulture, art therapy, and choral singing. At the cohort's 5-year follow-up, we examined if involvements in the CSAs improved cognition, compared to controls (<i>n</i> = 727). The primary outcomes were changes in global cognition and specific cognitive domain scores measured by the mini-mental state examination (MMSE). Exploratory subgroup analyses stratified by baseline cognitive status and the number of CSAs were also conducted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compared to the control group, there was a small improvement in the CSA group on the total MMSE score (<i>d</i> = 0.108) and MMSE-immediate recall score (<i>d</i> = 0.199). Furthermore, subgroup analyses revealed medium effect sizes of improvements (<i>d</i> = 0.420) in cognitive domains in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (vs. cognitively healthy) and those involved in two CSAs (vs. one CSA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>In summary, a CSA intervention improved cognition. MCI and those involved in two CSAs gained greater benefits from the CSAs. These sustained improvements in cognitive functions could have a significant impact on delaying or preventing dementia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8618,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 5-year community program in Singapore to prevent cognitive decline\",\"authors\":\"Ted Kheng Siang Ng,&nbsp;Lei Feng,&nbsp;Ru Yuan Chua,&nbsp;Lee Gan Goh,&nbsp;Ee Heok Kua,&nbsp;Rathi Mahendran\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/appy.12518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is a scarcity of naturalistic follow-up studies on cognitive stimulating activities (CSAs), particularly in a real-world setting and over long-term. We thus investigated a pooled novel CSA intervention to prevent cognitive decline amongst community-dwelling older adults without dementia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Nested within a community-based longitudinal follow-up cohort study of community-dwelling and multi-ethnic older adults (<i>N</i> = 991), a subset of the cohort (<i>n</i> = 264) underwent four single-blinded randomized controlled trials involving four novel CSAs, including mindfulness, horticulture, art therapy, and choral singing. At the cohort's 5-year follow-up, we examined if involvements in the CSAs improved cognition, compared to controls (<i>n</i> = 727). The primary outcomes were changes in global cognition and specific cognitive domain scores measured by the mini-mental state examination (MMSE). Exploratory subgroup analyses stratified by baseline cognitive status and the number of CSAs were also conducted.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Compared to the control group, there was a small improvement in the CSA group on the total MMSE score (<i>d</i> = 0.108) and MMSE-immediate recall score (<i>d</i> = 0.199). Furthermore, subgroup analyses revealed medium effect sizes of improvements (<i>d</i> = 0.420) in cognitive domains in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (vs. cognitively healthy) and those involved in two CSAs (vs. one CSA).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In summary, a CSA intervention improved cognition. MCI and those involved in two CSAs gained greater benefits from the CSAs. These sustained improvements in cognitive functions could have a significant impact on delaying or preventing dementia.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/appy.12518\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/appy.12518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关于认知刺激活动(csa)的自然主义随访研究很少,特别是在现实世界和长期环境中。因此,我们研究了一种新的综合CSA干预措施,以预防社区居住的无痴呆老年人的认知能力下降。方法在一项以社区为基础的纵向随访队列研究中(N = 991),其中一部分队列(N = 264)进行了四项单盲随机对照试验,涉及四种新型csa,包括正念、园艺、艺术疗法和合唱。在队列的5年随访中,我们检查了与对照组相比,参与csa是否改善了认知(n = 727)。主要结果是通过最小精神状态检查(MMSE)测量的整体认知和特定认知领域得分的变化。还进行了探索性亚组分析,按基线认知状况和csa数量分层。结果与对照组相比,CSA组在MMSE总分(d = 0.108)和MMSE-immediate recall总分(d = 0.199)上有小幅改善。此外,亚组分析显示轻度认知障碍(MCI)(相对于认知健康)和两次CSA(相对于一次CSA)的认知领域改善的中等效应量(d = 0.420)。综上所述,CSA干预改善了认知。MCI及参与两项社区服务支援计划的人士从社区服务支援计划获益较多。这些认知功能的持续改善可能对延缓或预防痴呆症产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A 5-year community program in Singapore to prevent cognitive decline

Introduction

There is a scarcity of naturalistic follow-up studies on cognitive stimulating activities (CSAs), particularly in a real-world setting and over long-term. We thus investigated a pooled novel CSA intervention to prevent cognitive decline amongst community-dwelling older adults without dementia.

Methods

Nested within a community-based longitudinal follow-up cohort study of community-dwelling and multi-ethnic older adults (N = 991), a subset of the cohort (n = 264) underwent four single-blinded randomized controlled trials involving four novel CSAs, including mindfulness, horticulture, art therapy, and choral singing. At the cohort's 5-year follow-up, we examined if involvements in the CSAs improved cognition, compared to controls (n = 727). The primary outcomes were changes in global cognition and specific cognitive domain scores measured by the mini-mental state examination (MMSE). Exploratory subgroup analyses stratified by baseline cognitive status and the number of CSAs were also conducted.

Results

Compared to the control group, there was a small improvement in the CSA group on the total MMSE score (d = 0.108) and MMSE-immediate recall score (d = 0.199). Furthermore, subgroup analyses revealed medium effect sizes of improvements (d = 0.420) in cognitive domains in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (vs. cognitively healthy) and those involved in two CSAs (vs. one CSA).

Discussion

In summary, a CSA intervention improved cognition. MCI and those involved in two CSAs gained greater benefits from the CSAs. These sustained improvements in cognitive functions could have a significant impact on delaying or preventing dementia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia-Pacific Psychiatry is an international psychiatric journal focused on the Asia and Pacific Rim region, and is the official journal of the Pacific Rim College of Psychiatrics. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry enables psychiatric and other mental health professionals in the region to share their research, education programs and clinical experience with a larger international readership. The journal offers a venue for high quality research for and from the region in the face of minimal international publication availability for authors concerned with the region. This includes findings highlighting the diversity in psychiatric behaviour, treatment and outcome related to social, ethnic, cultural and economic differences of the region. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and reviews, as well as clinically and educationally focused papers on regional best practices. Images, videos, a young psychiatrist''s corner, meeting reports, a journal club and contextual commentaries differentiate this journal from existing main stream psychiatry journals that are focused on other regions, or nationally focused within countries of Asia and the Pacific Rim.
期刊最新文献
Cross-Cultural Differences in the Pathways to Internet Gaming Disorder Issue Information Bipolar disorder and oxidative stress: A bibliometric perspective Issue Information Optimizing esketamine clinic implementation: Insights from Taiwan's mental health framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1